- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
WSJ: How Smuckers Screwed up Hostess
Posted on 7/12/26 at 9:18 am
Posted on 7/12/26 at 9:18 am
WSJ yesterday:
It turns out Smuckers did what corporations do when they buy other companies: They screw things up.
Yeah, put a finance guy in charge. Worked out great for GM and Boeing.
WSJ
quote:
In 2024, Mark Smucker, chief executive of food giant J.M. Smucker, took the stage at an industry conference and bit into a golden, creamy Twinkie. “Tastes like growth,” he said.
His company had just acquired Hostess, the maker of Twinkies, in a $5 billion deal and it seemed like a coup.
The Covid-19 pandemic had supercharged America’s snacking habit: Some 70% of consumers were eating at least two per day, Smucker said. Buying the owner of Ding Dongs and Donettes gave the jam-and-jelly maker entry into a $65 billion market for snacks. Smucker had beat out other suitors for Hostess, most notably General Mills.
Three years later, the deal isn’t tasting quite so sweet.
Sales for Smucker’s snack division, which includes Hostess, have declined for the last six quarters....
It turns out Smuckers did what corporations do when they buy other companies: They screw things up.
quote:
But some are of the company’s own making. Hostess donuts and cupcakes, it turned out, are surprisingly unlike Smucker jams, peanut butter and coffee. When it folded Hostess into its business, Smucker weakened key Hostess operating strengths tied to distribution and sales, several former and current executives and employees say.
Chief Financial Officer Tucker Marshall, in a recent interview, said: “We did have some internal execution issues that we’ve really right-sized and worked through our last fiscal year.” (Um, yeah)
A 14-year veteran of Smucker’s financial operations who now oversees Hostess, Marshall added that the company is focused on stabilizing the business.
Yeah, put a finance guy in charge. Worked out great for GM and Boeing.
quote:
Twinkies’ shelf life is considered a wonder of food science. But it tripped up Smucker.
The enriched flour, high-fructose corn syrup, and tallow that help make up the American classic give each small sponge cake about 65 days to be consumed. Hostess had worked, before the Smucker acquisition, to lengthen that shelf life.
Still, 65 days is a blink of an eye compared to the shelf life of many core Smucker products—fruit spreads, canned coffee and dog food—which can last for at least a year.
As a result, Hostess products require quicker delivery than Smucker’s. Products must turn faster through a central warehouse, and there is a greater risk that spoilage or production hiccups result in unfilled orders, executives and employees said
.When Hostess was a small, stand-alone company, the Hostess IT systems controlled every step of a Twinkie’s journey, from a retailer’s order to production to shipping. Smucker’s efforts to fold Hostess into its own systems stumbled, resulting in late and incomplete orders, the current and former executives and employees say.
Previously, Hostess could be nimble. If necessary, employees could call a plant and divert a truckload of strawberry CupCakes to a store that needed more inventory. Such moves became harder under Smucker, whose systems and longer lead times were less well suited to more perishable items.
There was another problem: Smucker mainly serves supermarkets’ center aisles, with brands like Jif, Folgers and Meow Mix. By contrast, some 40% of Hostess sales are in convenience stores.
Smucker separated Hostess employees who handled sales to grocery stores from those in charge of convenience stores, making it harder to forecast total demand, the current and former executives and employees say. Hostess lost shelf space and display opportunities to competitors.
WSJ
Posted on 7/12/26 at 9:24 am to prplhze2000
So Smuckers are the assholes who ruined the chocolate twinkie? They were like crack. I looked forward to my once a week snack.
Posted on 7/12/26 at 9:25 am to prplhze2000
quote:
whose systems and longer lead times were less well suited to more perishable items.
I didn’t realize Hostess made any food that could perish.
Posted on 7/12/26 at 9:28 am to prplhze2000
Finance people have completely destroyed most American industry.
Posted on 7/12/26 at 9:30 am to prplhze2000
quote:“Our Hostess is paying the price for her winking.”
WSJ: How Smuckers Screwed up Hostess
CSN&Y
Posted on 7/12/26 at 9:30 am to prplhze2000
Mergers that essentially leave the merged company intact (at least for an extended integration period) work the best.
Posted on 7/12/26 at 9:32 am to prplhze2000
It's not easy to screw up a Twinkie.
Posted on 7/12/26 at 9:33 am to Strannix
There is a great TikTok video that explains how Roger Smith, an accounting guy at GM, made colossal mistake after colossal mistake after he took over GM. He is the reason no one wants any 80's cars from GM.
Posted on 7/12/26 at 9:37 am to udtiger
quote:yep. was coming to say the same thing. I've been on both sides of this and not doing that was what both companies screwed up, but they want so badly to streamline the metrics, they cost themselves millions and millions of $$$$$s.
Mergers that essentially leave the merged company intact (at least for an extended integration period) work the best.
Posted on 7/12/26 at 9:44 am to faraway
Citi once bought a mortgage lender from ABN AMRO in the 2000s. Company had the best rates for the high volume clients, best and quickest website, and reps made great money. The company did not do anything but A paper, no subprime mortgages.
Citi claimed they were going to use it to improve their mortgage division, how they could learn from it. Uh huh.
Got rid of the rates for the high volume clients (These were A+ companies who didn't deal in subprime crap). Took down the website and made them use their own inefficient and clunky website. Reps saw their pay cut in half. Closing times got worse since the website was removed and Citi had different systems. Then they couldn't figure out why no one was producing or how they lost so much business but hey, they were Citi and too big to fail. When it was all said and done, Citi didn't change anything on their end but destroyed everything good about the company it bought.
Which they were. Obama bailed them out when the share price hit .50.
Citi claimed they were going to use it to improve their mortgage division, how they could learn from it. Uh huh.
Got rid of the rates for the high volume clients (These were A+ companies who didn't deal in subprime crap). Took down the website and made them use their own inefficient and clunky website. Reps saw their pay cut in half. Closing times got worse since the website was removed and Citi had different systems. Then they couldn't figure out why no one was producing or how they lost so much business but hey, they were Citi and too big to fail. When it was all said and done, Citi didn't change anything on their end but destroyed everything good about the company it bought.
Which they were. Obama bailed them out when the share price hit .50.
Posted on 7/12/26 at 9:49 am to prplhze2000
I'm sure Smuckers has done made up for the loss and then some with their Uncrustables.
Posted on 7/12/26 at 10:05 am to prplhze2000
Biggest takeaway is that a twinkies shelf life is only considered to be 65 days
Posted on 7/12/26 at 10:09 am to prplhze2000
A summary for those that don’t want to read that enormous wall of text
* Smucker bought Hostess for about $5B thinking it would be a huge win, but it’s been struggling ever since.
* A lot of the problems were self-inflicted. They merged Hostess into Smucker’s systems, and it messed up ordering, shipping, and keeping stores stocked.
* Hostess products have a much shorter shelf life than Smucker’s other products, so they need a faster, more flexible distribution system—which Smucker didn’t really have.
* They also reorganized the sales teams, and it hurt convenience store sales (which are a huge part of Hostess’s business), costing them shelf space and sales.
* Bottom line: It sounds like the brands weren’t the problem—the way Smucker integrated the company was.
* Smucker bought Hostess for about $5B thinking it would be a huge win, but it’s been struggling ever since.
* A lot of the problems were self-inflicted. They merged Hostess into Smucker’s systems, and it messed up ordering, shipping, and keeping stores stocked.
* Hostess products have a much shorter shelf life than Smucker’s other products, so they need a faster, more flexible distribution system—which Smucker didn’t really have.
* They also reorganized the sales teams, and it hurt convenience store sales (which are a huge part of Hostess’s business), costing them shelf space and sales.
* Bottom line: It sounds like the brands weren’t the problem—the way Smucker integrated the company was.
This post was edited on 7/12/26 at 10:10 am
Posted on 7/12/26 at 10:10 am to prplhze2000
quote:
Yeah, put a finance guy in charge.
Finance guys are almost always in charge of deals like this and even if they aren’t explicitly at the helm, they are a significant part of the M&A process.
These deals are always about the money, right? Why would you not want a finance guy in charge?
This post was edited on 7/12/26 at 10:11 am
Posted on 7/12/26 at 10:49 am to HoustonGumbeauxGuy
That's why I highlighted the text smartass
Because you don't want an accounting or finance guy overseeing operations and product development
Because you don't want an accounting or finance guy overseeing operations and product development
This post was edited on 7/12/26 at 10:50 am
Posted on 7/12/26 at 11:34 am to prplhze2000
quote:
Smucker separated Hostess employees who handled sales to grocery stores from those in charge of convenience stores, making it harder to forecast total demand, the current and former executives and employees say. Hostess lost shelf space and display opportunities to competitors
Shoulda hired Miss Terri away from Little Debbie.
This post was edited on 7/12/26 at 11:35 am
Posted on 7/12/26 at 12:02 pm to Strannix
quote:
Finance people have completely destroyed most American industry.
There must be an economics college class all the finance people they hire have absolutely aced called "Extreme Short-Sightedness 101"
Posted on 7/12/26 at 1:03 pm to prplhze2000
quote:
70% of consumers were eating at least two per day, Smucker said
I haven't had a Twinkie in probably 20 years and the last time I had one it was so awful I said id never eat one again.
Maybe you should talk to the frickers who replaced the hostess recipes with cheaper shite ingredients.
I've forgotten many things in my life but there are tastes that I never forget and hostess screwed their products up decades ago.
This post was edited on 7/12/26 at 1:05 pm
Popular
Back to top

21










