Started By
Message

WSJ: Exxon Planning Board, Other Changes Amid Activist Pressure

Posted on 1/27/21 at 10:42 am
Posted by dewster
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
25361 posts
Posted on 1/27/21 at 10:42 am
quote:

Exxon Planning Board, Other Changes Amid Activist Pressure

D.E. Shaw Group, Engine No. 1 LLC are the activist investors involved


Wall Street Journal

Exxon Mobil Corp. XOM 0.83% is preparing to make changes to its board and adopt further measures to reduce its carbon footprint as the beleaguered energy giant faces pressure from a pair of activist investors.

The company is discussing adding one or more new directors to the board and stepping up sustainability investments, people familiar with the matter said. Irving, Tex.-based Exxon, which has been reducing its overall capital spending, could also curtail it further.

Exxon is in talks with one of the activists, D.E. Shaw Group, which may end up supporting the moves, some of the people said. Meanwhile, the other, Engine No. 1 LLC, is moving forward with a planned proxy fight for four board seats, it said Wednesday.

Exact details couldn’t be learned and the talks with D.E. Shaw could still fall apart. Like other activists, D.E. Shaw sometimes employs nonbinding handshake agreements with the companies it targets to avert a proxy fight.

The company said in a statement in response to the Engine No. 1 move that it has engaged with the firm since mid-December and that its board-affairs committee will evaluate the nominees. “ExxonMobil will continue to update shareholders in the coming weeks on the company’s strategy to build long-term, sustainable value for shareholders,” the company said. “It will also provide updates on company performance and actions to address climate change, including initiatives to commercialize technologies which are key to reducing emissions and meeting societal goals consistent with the Paris Agreement.”

Exxon could announce the changes as soon as next week, possibly with its fourth-quarter earnings Tuesday, the people said, though there is no guarantee it will do so.

The company is expected to report its fourth straight quarterly loss, the longest such losing streak in its modern history.



quote:

Prior to the pandemic, Exxon Chief Executive Darren Woods embarked on an ambitious strategy to spend more to increase production. The sharp drop in demand for fossil fuels since then triggered billions of dollars of losses for the company. In November, Exxon pulled back from Mr. Woods’ plan to boost its overall oil-and-gas production by one million barrels a day by 2025. The company said it would cut billions of dollars from its capital expenditures over the next five years and invest only in its best assets.


quote:

Adding to the pressure, the Securities and Exchange Commission is investigating whether Exxon is overvaluing one of its most important oil-and-gas properties, The Wall Street Journal recently reported.

Investors have been pressuring Exxon to boost its lagging share price, and the activists have pushed for moves that include reducing capital expenditures and expanding in renewable energy. Exxon’s shares are down about 30% in the past year.

BlackRock Inc. Chief Executive Larry Fink this week asked companies to disclose more information on how they are moving to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions, adding another pressure point for Exxon given that the investing giant is one of its biggest shareholders.

Newly established Engine No. 1 said Wednesday it nominated four previously announced board candidates. It said in December it planned to make the nominations with the support of California State Teachers’ Retirement System, the big pension investor. Together they control less than 0.3% of Exxon, which has a market value of about $193 billion, so the outcome of their campaign will depend on whether they get buy-in from more significant investors.


Engine No. 1 and Exxon have held informal talks, but have so far failed to agree. That potentially sets up a drawn-out and expensive battle as the two sides campaign for shareholder support for their board candidates, culminating in a vote at the company’s annual meeting this spring.


quote:

D.E. Shaw, a hedge fund best known for its quantitative trading, is an occasional activist, having picked fights at companies including at Emerson Electric Co. and Lowe’s Cos.


I wanted to post this given how critical Exxon is to Louisiana's economy - particularly the Baton Rouge/New Orleans area as well as southeast Texas. I think an argument can be made that Standard Oil's refinery (now Exxon) in Baton Rouge is responsible for putting the capital area on the map.

The company is getting a lot of pressure from activist investors that are trying to force the firm to back off of some of their core businesses.
This post was edited on 1/27/21 at 10:46 am
Posted by LegendInMyMind
Member since Apr 2019
54291 posts
Posted on 1/27/21 at 10:44 am to
quote:

The company is getting pressure from activist investors that are trying to force the firm to back off of some of their core businesses.

Those investors should be looked at as economic terrorists and dealt with accordingly. Appeasement never works.
Posted by jlovel7
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2014
21319 posts
Posted on 1/27/21 at 10:45 am to
Why would investors in a company want them to nerf themselves?

ETA: The California Teachers Pension system is invested in Exxon? That's fricking rich.
This post was edited on 1/27/21 at 10:46 am
Posted by dewster
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
25361 posts
Posted on 1/27/21 at 10:46 am to
quote:

Why would investors in a company want them to nerf themselves?



Activist investors. This is not your typical investment group. I guess the lower stock price has made XOM vulnerable to this.
Posted by High C
viewing the fall....
Member since Nov 2012
53810 posts
Posted on 1/27/21 at 10:47 am to
Do these idiots understand how vital the PetroChem industry is to the entire economy. It’s not just about “fossil fuels”.
Posted by LegendInMyMind
Member since Apr 2019
54291 posts
Posted on 1/27/21 at 10:50 am to
quote:

Do these idiots understand how vital the PetroChem industry is to the entire economy. It’s not just about “fossil fuels”.


No they don't. They believe that the only thing oil goes into or is used for is their vehicles.
This post was edited on 1/27/21 at 10:51 am
Posted by member12
Bob's Country Bunker
Member since May 2008
32096 posts
Posted on 1/27/21 at 10:53 am to
quote:

“It will also provide updates on company performance and actions to address climate change, including initiatives to commercialize technologies which are key to reducing emissions and meeting societal goals consistent with the Paris Agreement.”


This likely means getting out of or scaling back the refining business.
This post was edited on 1/27/21 at 10:54 am
Posted by High C
viewing the fall....
Member since Nov 2012
53810 posts
Posted on 1/27/21 at 10:57 am to
America will rue the day that this administration was “elected”.
Posted by goofball
Member since Mar 2015
16867 posts
Posted on 1/27/21 at 10:58 am to
This could be really bad for a lot of people.
Posted by dewster
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
25361 posts
Posted on 1/27/21 at 11:08 am to
quote:

This likely means getting out of or scaling back the refining business.



Hopefully that's not the case.
Posted by Sao
East Texas Piney Woods
Member since Jun 2009
65756 posts
Posted on 1/27/21 at 11:08 am to
quote:

No they don't. They believe that the only thing oil goes into or is used for is their vehicles.


You don't really believe this, do you?
Posted by LegendInMyMind
Member since Apr 2019
54291 posts
Posted on 1/27/21 at 11:11 am to
quote:

You don't really believe this, do you?

I'm sure a few of them don't believe that.
Posted by RealityTiger
Geismar, LA
Member since Jan 2010
20446 posts
Posted on 1/27/21 at 11:14 am to
quote:

You don't really believe this, do you?


Why wouldn't he? If all the people screaming for shutting down plants and becoming less dependent on oil really understood the processes and what chemicals are made downstream from it (and what those chemicals are used to produce) - then we wouldn't be having this dumb conversation.
Posted by dewster
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
25361 posts
Posted on 1/27/21 at 11:14 am to
quote:

You don't really believe this, do you?



A lot of foolish people associate Exxon, Shell, BP, etc. with their retail fuel business and assume that their refineries exclusively exist to support automotive related transportation. I know a few people that actually believe this, but somehow consider themselves brilliant and informed environmentalists.
This post was edited on 1/27/21 at 11:17 am
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
134865 posts
Posted on 1/27/21 at 11:15 am to
Is this some activist group with ties to the current administration designed to give Exxon exemption from new environmental restrictions by paying this extortion?
Posted by tigerinthebueche
Member since Oct 2010
36791 posts
Posted on 1/27/21 at 11:17 am to
quote:

You don't really believe this, do you?


Yes. I’ve met plenty of people who think fuel is the only thing for which we use oil.
Posted by Sao
East Texas Piney Woods
Member since Jun 2009
65756 posts
Posted on 1/27/21 at 11:19 am to

I think I would be more pissed at how Wall Street controls America period but that's just me. Take out the triggering "activist" word and you're still left with the entire energy sector being led by the nose by Big Money. Stockholder Value...

Louisiana chose to go all in on 1 thing. Like Detroit. Have to claw your way out now. Ford, GM et al will change the way cars and trucks run by 2030. Just is what it is.
Posted by MrLSU
Yellowstone, Val d'isere
Member since Jan 2004
25992 posts
Posted on 1/27/21 at 11:21 am to
quote:

quote:
“It will also provide updates on company performance and actions to address climate change, including initiatives to commercialize technologies which are key to reducing emissions and meeting societal goals consistent with the Paris Agreement.”



"This likely means getting out of or scaling back the refining business."


"The company is discussing adding one or more new directors to the board and stepping up sustainability investments, people familiar with the matter said. Irving, Tex.-based Exxon, which has been reducing its overall capital spending, could also curtail it further. "

Rosemount Refinery plans massive on-site solar plant
Posted by LegendInMyMind
Member since Apr 2019
54291 posts
Posted on 1/27/21 at 11:22 am to
You said this:
quote:

Louisiana chose to go all in on 1 thing. Like Detroit. Have to claw your way out now. Ford, GM et al will change the way cars and trucks run by 2030. Just is what it is.

After asking me if I really believe there are people who think the only thing oil is used for is vehicles.

I rest my case.
Posted by Sao
East Texas Piney Woods
Member since Jun 2009
65756 posts
Posted on 1/27/21 at 11:22 am to
quote:

Yes. I’ve met plenty of people who think fuel is the only thing for which we use oil.


I'm talking about his implication a hedge fund doesn't know. That's conjecture. but on the whole, of course crude isn't going to be completely shut down. Refining and capacities scaled back? Of course. It's common sense. Has been on the horizon for 10 years.
This post was edited on 1/27/21 at 11:23 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram