Started By
Message

re: Wisconsin police release deadly shooting of police and paramedics trying to help a man

Posted on 6/18/19 at 11:16 am to
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
88413 posts
Posted on 6/18/19 at 11:16 am to
quote:

So did the smoker that has lung cancer. So did the diabetic that continues to eat garbage. So did the dialysis patient that wouldn't take his HTN medications?

Let's just cut them off too, right?
Uh, yes.

If they want to pay for treatments for themselves then fine.
Posted by Bedhog
Denham Springs
Member since Apr 2019
3741 posts
Posted on 6/18/19 at 11:17 am to
quote:

at some point I crossed over to where it wasn’t a choice anymore. There’s an obsession that comes along with addiction and once that kicks in, good luck stopping it.


I have no sympathy at this point. You got yourself in this mess, get out of it or face the consequences.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
293122 posts
Posted on 6/18/19 at 11:17 am to
quote:

And at one point in my life 7 beers would get me hammered. Then 10. Then 12. Then I realized I need to lay off the alcohol because I see a pattern starting and I’m aware that this can happen to people. So I pulled WAY back on my alcohol consumption.


Absolutely agree with you. Addicts and alcoholics make choices which lead to addiction. It's a personality flaw as much as anything else

However, once addicted it's a serious mental illness that is almost impossible to treat by just stopping, though that's how I became sober.

There is a huge difference between addict and recreational use
Posted by TH03
Mogadishu
Member since Dec 2008
171936 posts
Posted on 6/18/19 at 11:20 am to
quote:

There is a huge difference between addict and recreational use


Yeah and your tolerance increasing doesn't make you an addict.
Posted by CarRamrod
Spurbury, VT
Member since Dec 2006
58265 posts
Posted on 6/18/19 at 11:20 am to
quote:

So for an addict they do have a choice to start in most cases. When I drank for the first time I chose to do that. Same with smoking weed, coke, popping pills etc. at some point I crossed over to where it wasn’t a choice anymore. There’s an obsession that comes along with addiction and once that kicks in, good luck stopping it.
I understand and agree with all you said. But you can't become an drug addict by not doing drugs. Plain and simple.
Posted by uway
Member since Sep 2004
33109 posts
Posted on 6/18/19 at 11:20 am to
quote:


I have no sympathy at this point


Surely you don’t believe that this standpoint is OBJECTIVELY the correct one, right?

It’s your opinion, and I can see the reasons for it, but there’s nothing to say that it should be the default position society takes towards addicts.
Posted by EarlyCuyler3
Appalachia
Member since Nov 2017
27290 posts
Posted on 6/18/19 at 11:22 am to
quote:

You can’t just turn off the cancer once you have it, no matter what caused it.


You can't turn off addiction either. You can only arrest it.

People love to use the cancer stick to try and win the debate. There are many types of diseases. Many preventable, many not. We all die of some disease eventually.

People get hung up on the idea that if addiction is equal to a disease this somehow invalidates the personal responsibility that the person has for recovering. It couldn't be further from the truth. It really means that person is 100% responsible for getting better.

It's terrible when stuff like this happens. Those cops and EMS guys were just trying to help the guy out. And they got screwed in the process. The solution is not throwing the baby out with the bathwater.

Addiction is exploding, like it or not. And it's exploding whether it's a disease or not. The disease concept allows a path for treatment. The old corporal punishment method does not. I'll take a 10% chance with a disease concept than a 0% chance with their alternative. And it's not even as if they have a valid alternative.

In spite of the overwhelming evidence, they continue to postulate "the addict should just stop and is choosing to do this." I fail to see a solution there. If there was a solution there, this discussion wouldn't be occurring, would it?
Posted by lsuguy13
RIP MATT
Member since Mar 2004
9509 posts
Posted on 6/18/19 at 11:22 am to
quote:

have no sympathy at this point. You got yourself in this mess, get out of it or face the consequences.



I’m just trying to explain what it’s like. A “normie” wouldn’t understand.

I have an allergy when I put drugs and alcohol in my body. I go to jail, get in fights, and don’t stop using.

Eventually i
Got tired of this way of life but it was hell on earth for me for about 6 years.
Posted by Ed Osteen
Member since Oct 2007
58765 posts
Posted on 6/18/19 at 11:23 am to
quote:

Addiction is not deadly


Of course it is
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
88413 posts
Posted on 6/18/19 at 11:23 am to
quote:

So congrats, you're not an addict?
I bet you I could become one if I tried hard enough.

But I had/have goals, I’m self aware, and I constantly think about cause and effect in my life.

That seems like a pretty solid way to beat the disease.
Posted by EarlyCuyler3
Appalachia
Member since Nov 2017
27290 posts
Posted on 6/18/19 at 11:24 am to
quote:

I understand and agree with all you said. But you can't become an drug addict by not doing drugs. Plain and simple.


That's why it's a multi-factorial issue. It will often come out in other ways, but you're right and that's beside the point.
Posted by EarlyCuyler3
Appalachia
Member since Nov 2017
27290 posts
Posted on 6/18/19 at 11:26 am to
quote:

That seems like a pretty solid way to beat the disease.


No, that seems like a decent way to plan a life. I don't see how that helps beat a disease in the slightest.
Posted by uway
Member since Sep 2004
33109 posts
Posted on 6/18/19 at 11:27 am to
quote:


Of course it is



It’s only deadly because of the behavior it leads to. Behavior is modifiable, so no, addiction is not deadly in and of itself in the way cancer is.
I’m not saying addiction can’t be technically termed a disease. Im saying it’s not like cancer, because in an extremely important way, it’s not. Objectively, it’s not.
Posted by Bedhog
Denham Springs
Member since Apr 2019
3741 posts
Posted on 6/18/19 at 11:27 am to
quote:

I bet you I could become one if I tried hard enough.

But I had/have goals, I’m self aware, and I constantly think about cause and effect in my life.

That seems like a pretty solid way to beat the disease.


You and I agree. I like pain pills but refuse to take them when prescribed. Why can't others?
Posted by uway
Member since Sep 2004
33109 posts
Posted on 6/18/19 at 11:35 am to
quote:

The disease concept allows a path for treatment. The old corporal punishment method does not. I'll take a 10% chance with a disease concept than a 0% chance with their alternative. And it's not even as if they have a valid alternative.


The question is whether the disease concept does more harm or more good.

I think it’s logically undeniable that calling it a disease could negatively affect the addict’s belief in their own ability to fight it.

Ideally, the resources available for treatment wouldn’t be based on semantics.
Posted by Ray Corona
Atlanta
Member since Jun 2019
119 posts
Posted on 6/18/19 at 11:37 am to
quote:

I'm a recovering addict.


You not being able to control yourself from using drugs or alcohol isn't a 'disease'. Ebola is a disease. HIV/AIDS is a disease. Hepatitis A is a disease.

You not being able to have the self control to use a substance isn't a 'disease'. It is poor choices and poor personal responsibility. The 'disease' excuse is just to make you feel better about yourslef. It is a lie.
Posted by Sneaky__Sally
Member since Jul 2015
12364 posts
Posted on 6/18/19 at 11:38 am to
but calling it a disease allows for a greater discussion, path to treatment IMO. A lot of people today hide their problems / struggles even more so than those struggling with depression and that kind of thing.

Gives people greater freedom to admit their struggles / disease / whatever you want to call it and seek a path to recovery. At least IMO
Posted by Ed Osteen
Member since Oct 2007
58765 posts
Posted on 6/18/19 at 11:39 am to
quote:

Addicts and alcoholics make choices which lead to addiction. It's a personality flaw as much as anything else


For sure, all 4 of my grandparents were alcoholics and it killed 2 of them. I will never blame anyone for me being an alcoholic but I was drinking at an early age without any real repercussions. Being a daily drinker wasn’t some overnight decision, it was an extremely slow progression. I didn’t just wake up one day and randomly decide a need some vodka with my eggs
This post was edited on 6/18/19 at 11:41 am
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
88413 posts
Posted on 6/18/19 at 11:40 am to
I hear you on all of that.


Question..

Odds tell me that some folks don’t have the disease and just like drugs so much that they do them for a long time and then die(or don’t die, I guess). These folks just do shite tons of drugs and love them.

If they said they have the disease would they be wrong? Is it possible to be born without the disease and develop it later(without doing drugs)?

Some drugs themselves are addicting. So non disease carrying people can become addicted to them, no? So it’s not just about genetics?
Posted by windshieldman
Member since Nov 2012
12818 posts
Posted on 6/18/19 at 11:41 am to
As a medic I thought this could have been a good thread with good discussions about what medics and police deal with regarding these situations, and how awful it is seeing people overdosed like that. But damn, y’all been butchering the shite out of this thread
Jump to page
Page First 9 10 11 12 13 ... 16
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 11 of 16Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram