re: Will Smith Murder Trial-Guilty of manslaughter and attempted manslaughter

quote:

---

I think he might actually be setting up a great trap. He get's the ADA to go all in on the fact that only Hayes fired, then fuller openly admits Hayes was the only one to shoot, and brings up the question that if Smith was shot while he was returning to his vehicle, how IS the reside on his hands?

---

Why does it matter? Explain it.

There's no evidence that Smith fired a weapon whatsoever. No one has testified to this. There's pictures of his body partially in the vehicle.

Its pretty stupid but stupid people probably eat this shite up.

quote:

---

obvious misdirection.

---

I think there is a layer here you are missing.

If Smith did NOT shoot a gun, then if there is residue his hands were close to a gun that went off.

quote:

---

you don't think O' Neal would've?

---

he already said he didn't see the first shots

nobody has admitted to seeing the first shots

quote:

---

I think there is a layer here you are missing.

---

nah, you want there to be a missing layer.

quote:

---

I think he might actually be setting up a great trap. He get's the ADA to go all in on the fact that only Hayes fired, then fuller openly admits Hayes was the only one to shoot, and brings up the question that if Smith was shot while he was returning to his vehicle, how IS the reside on his hands?

Creating some doubt that Smith might have been tangling for the gun when the shooting started. Let's see where he takes it.

---

That's what I was thinking as well. And why there were questions earlier to the wife, whether or not Will was at the shooting range earlier that day.

quote:

---

Why does it matter? Explain it. There's no evidence that Smith fired a weapon whatsoever.

---

Exactly my point, if Smith never fired a weapon, if I am on a jury, I am really curious how that residue got there. Fuller is going about it differently than I would set it up, but I can see him absolutely painting the narrative into the corner that there is no way Smith shot a gun, then turning around and asking "how do you explain the residue, was he struggling for Hayes gun?"

quote:

---

Nado knows Hayes and is making shite up.

---

RA'd for telling lies

quote:

---

the other said smith did nothing to deserve being shot in the back 7 times.

---

that was his opinion. he may have looked away for a brief second.

quote:

---

nah, you want there to be a missing layer.

---

I literally don't care at all.

I'm not one of the guys you have been going back and forth with.

I am just trying to make sense of a good lawyer's seemingly confusing line of questioning; I personally think he has something up his sleeve.