Started By
Message
locked post

Wikipedia constantly poor-mouthing and begging for money...

Posted on 11/19/23 at 2:39 am
Posted by ZIGG
Member since Dec 2016
12044 posts
Posted on 11/19/23 at 2:39 am
shite is ridiculous




This post was edited on 11/19/23 at 2:41 am
Posted by Obtuse1
Westside Bodymore Yo
Member since Sep 2016
30388 posts
Posted on 11/19/23 at 2:43 am to
They don't sell data and don't cover the pages with ads so I don't mind tossing them a few bucks a year.

In the end, if you don't use Wiki you wouldn't see them asking for money.
Posted by lsuroadie
South LA
Member since Oct 2007
8456 posts
Posted on 11/19/23 at 3:11 am to
Wiki is a piece of the socialist progressive cancer that’s infected our country/

frick em
Posted by LSUGrad2024
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2023
629 posts
Posted on 11/19/23 at 3:18 am to
quote:

They don't sell data and don't cover the pages with ads so I don't mind tossing them a few bucks a year.


Meanwhile they allow the mass conversion by “editors” of all BC and AD years to BCE and CE. Atheist pricks. Yet if someone tries to convert them back…
Posted by Obtuse1
Westside Bodymore Yo
Member since Sep 2016
30388 posts
Posted on 11/19/23 at 3:24 am to
quote:

Wiki is a piece of the socialist progressive cancer that’s infected our country/


It is a horrible source on subjects that lend themselves to opinion or editorializing but it is generally a great source when trying to find something like the Cd of an E30 M3 or a basic explanation of shear thinning in non-Newtonian fluids.
Posted by Obtuse1
Westside Bodymore Yo
Member since Sep 2016
30388 posts
Posted on 11/19/23 at 3:34 am to
quote:

Meanwhile they allow the mass conversion by “editors” of all BC and AD years to BCE and CE. Atheist pricks. Yet if someone tries to convert them back…


If Dionysius The Humble hadn't screwed up and left out year zero then scholars (including biblical scholars) wouldn't need to shift to BCE and CE, there is a year missing between BC and AD. Never mind Jesus wasn't born in that missing year anyway. Jesus was born sometime between 5 and 7 BC.
This post was edited on 11/19/23 at 3:42 am
Posted by JackieTreehorn
Member since Sep 2013
35576 posts
Posted on 11/19/23 at 3:48 am to
quote:

the Cd of an E30 M3 or a basic explanation of shear thinning in non-Newtonian fluids.

I was just thinking about these things a few days ago.
Posted by LSU6262
Member since Jun 2008
8021 posts
Posted on 11/19/23 at 4:32 am to
I mean, it's not like this just started

They've been doing this for 20 years
Posted by ThatTahoeOverThere
Member since Nov 2021
4959 posts
Posted on 11/19/23 at 5:58 am to
I make editorial contributions all the time and they throw them away like the dead babies the Clinton's eat.
Posted by Obtuse1
Westside Bodymore Yo
Member since Sep 2016
30388 posts
Posted on 11/19/23 at 6:35 am to
quote:

JackieTreehorn



quote:

I was just thinking about these things a few days ago.


If you didn't spend all your time treating objects like women you might have time to consider other things, man.
Posted by Bestbank Tiger
Premium Member
Member since Jan 2005
80681 posts
Posted on 11/19/23 at 6:36 am to
quote:

Wiki is a piece of the socialist progressive cancer that’s infected our country/

frick em


But it's still fun to vandalize a page on gameday.
Posted by RidiculousHype
The Hatch
Member since Sep 2007
10949 posts
Posted on 11/19/23 at 7:17 am to
quote:

Have you ever wondered why the Wikimedia Foundation wants so much money? It certainly isn’t needed to operate Wikipedia. You can literally fit a copy of the entire text on your phone! So, what’s the money for? Inquiring minds want to know …


- Elon
Posted by SwampSlime
Member since Sep 2018
191 posts
Posted on 11/19/23 at 7:40 am to
quote:

I make editorial contributions all the time and they throw them away like the dead babies the Clinton's eat.


lol
Posted by hojo
St. Louis, MO
Member since Mar 2005
1366 posts
Posted on 11/19/23 at 7:54 am to
quote:

If Dionysius The Humble hadn't screwed up and left out year zero then scholars (including biblical scholars) wouldn't need to shift to BCE and CE, there is a year missing between BC and AD. Never mind Jesus wasn't born in that missing year anyway. Jesus was born sometime between 5 and 7 BC.


Yeah, none of those things would have kept the politically correct change to BCE and CE from happening. You know this.
Posted by Obtuse1
Westside Bodymore Yo
Member since Sep 2016
30388 posts
Posted on 11/19/23 at 8:17 am to
quote:


Yeah, none of those things would have kept the politically correct change to BCE and CE from happening. You know this.


It was a flawed system. I can't speculate on any individual's impetus but the revision is more accurate. Keep in mind the BCS/CE has been in use since the 1800s in scholarly work, both secular and religious.

The BC/AD system was designed by Dionysius over 500 years after Jesus' birth and left out the year he was supposedly born. It also miscalculated his birth since it has him being born 4 years after Herod died. How silly is it that a calendar set up to accurately determine Easter completely left out the year Jesus was born?
This post was edited on 11/19/23 at 8:22 am
Posted by hojo
St. Louis, MO
Member since Mar 2005
1366 posts
Posted on 11/19/23 at 8:30 am to
quote:

How silly is it that a calendar set up to accurately determine Easter completely left out the year Jesus was born?


So is it your opinion that the miscalculation had more to do with the change than the fact that the Much more popular (regardless of "scholarly work" usage) designations were abbreviations for "Before Christ" and "In the Year of Our Lord?"
This post was edited on 11/19/23 at 8:43 am
Posted by WB Davis
Member since May 2018
2327 posts
Posted on 11/19/23 at 8:41 am to
quote:

ZIGG
shite is ridiculous
Bet you're a big tipper at restaurants and barber shops
Posted by Obtuse1
Westside Bodymore Yo
Member since Sep 2016
30388 posts
Posted on 11/19/23 at 8:48 am to
quote:


So is it your opinion that the miscalculation had more to do with the change than the fact that the Much more popular (regardless of "scholarly work" usage) designations were abbreviations for "Before Christ" and "In the Year of Our Lord"?


Absolutely, the fact that it is incorrect was the impetus for the shift away from BC/AD in the 1800's. If Dionysius Exiguus had gotten it right then BC/BCE likely would have never existed.

I am ambivalent about either's use but I do not expect BC/AD to be used in scholarly work therefore I don't expect to see it used in the reference section. People see what they want to see but for me it is simple, one is accurate and one is inaccurate.
Posted by soccerfüt
Location: A Series of Tubes
Member since May 2013
74695 posts
Posted on 11/19/23 at 8:54 am to
quote:

Jesus was born sometime between 5 and 7 BC.
So for like 5 to 7 years we were technically without a Christ?

Whoa!

Posted by hojo
St. Louis, MO
Member since Mar 2005
1366 posts
Posted on 11/19/23 at 8:59 am to
quote:

Absolutely, the fact that it is incorrect was the impetus


Then I guess we'll agree to disagree. Most of what I've read indicates that while the miscalculation is very real, religious neutrality is most often attributed to the shift.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram