Started By
Message

re: Wife of St. Tammany parish fire chief killed by bullet, not the fire

Posted on 9/14/17 at 5:33 pm to
Posted by Havoc
Member since Nov 2015
28348 posts
Posted on 9/14/17 at 5:33 pm to
quote:

Kill this thread for Christ sake.

What the frick is your basis for wanting the thread to be killed?
Posted by White Roach
Member since Apr 2009
9454 posts
Posted on 9/14/17 at 5:50 pm to
Right. The case isn't being closed, Smith just said Krental has been cleared (which absolutely nobody believes)
Posted by gingerkittie
Member since Aug 2013
2675 posts
Posted on 9/14/17 at 5:59 pm to
quote:

Kill this thread for Christ sake.


Why? I speak about facts and if it my opinion or a theory I say so. I am careful not to name names except for steve.

Maybe if sheriff smith would do his fricking job, we wouldn't be here discussing this.

We want answers and we want justice. Want us to shut up? Then complain to smith about WTF is going on and should I say the lack of stuff going on. he needs to hand this case off to a higher authorities. Give us some faith and confidence in them that they are doing what we PAY them to do.

I hope the feds can come in and find a federal crime and take over.

TL;DR warning for below

The feds can be so amazing. i had a student who was brutally murdered along with his mom, sister, infant niece and his lil brother is still a vegetable from that night. Well the locals in Jeff parish acquitted the killer (He as the infant baby's daddy).

He stabbed them all, except the baby and set the place on fire with the baby in the crib. he confessed, was tried and somehow acquitted. He killed FOUR people (really 5 because the lil brother is a vegetable now and has never left hospital care. Too much brain damage).

Well when the feds feel that a case "cries out for justice" they step in and get to work.It took years but even though that killer was acquitted in Jeff parish the feds stepped in with a federal charge (the building her burned was part of public housing).he was charged with "arson affecting interstate commerce".

So they charged him all over again. No double jeporday because they were different courts (parish and federal).

Well they nailed his arse and he got life in prison. i can only hope Nanette's killer ends up in a cell with him. They have so much in common.
This post was edited on 9/14/17 at 6:00 pm
Posted by gingerkittie
Member since Aug 2013
2675 posts
Posted on 9/14/17 at 6:40 pm to
quote:

Kill this thread for Christ sake.


I am seriously and courteously asking what your objections are. We are not naming names or going after anyone or harassing anyone. We are simply discussing something that desperately needs to be discussed and resolved.

Why on earth do you object to people caring about a sweet woman who was brutally murdered, along with her 3 pets.

Honestly, let me know what it is that you find so offensive and i will try to be more respectful of your opinions and feelings.

I could understand if Nanette's family objected to her case being discussed. But they are aware of the thread and have participated in it. Overall it has been fairly respectful for which I highly commend everyone here. This is the OT after all.

What is your objection?? there is a person out there who killed an innocent woman and 3 beloved family pets. Why would you NOT want us to push for justice? Why would you not want this person locked up? What would you rather we do? Nan's family wants people to keep this case alive.

Frankly, this has been the best and most comprehensive thread on the internet discussing the case.

Seriously, why kill it?

PS. I just spoke with someone from her "Justice for Nanette" FB group and I asked them if they objected to the thread or wanted ups to stop.

The told me heck no and to keep going.

So thank you to the people here who are contributing and keeping it going, It means so much to her loved ones.
This post was edited on 9/14/17 at 6:49 pm
Posted by Minpin32
Member since Apr 2016
27 posts
Posted on 9/14/17 at 7:55 pm to
quote:

Kill this thread

Ya know a-hole you don't have to click on this thread or comment. You can move along and nobody would miss you.
Posted by tigerpimpbot
Chairman of the Pool Board
Member since Nov 2011
66928 posts
Posted on 9/14/17 at 8:13 pm to
quote:

Kill this thread for Christ sake.


Why don't you want #justicefornanette bro?
Posted by gingerkittie
Member since Aug 2013
2675 posts
Posted on 9/14/17 at 8:55 pm to
Yep, clicking on and reading thread is totally optional.

The fact is that this thread is bringing things to the light that need to be exposed. information is shared, discussed and passed on to those who can use it.

I was just thinking of the Mickey Shunick thread. Can you imagine what would happen if you someone had just killed off that thread in the beginning? That thing was a wonder to behold with all it contained. The info in it was incredible. Give ya'll a super blurry, small pic of an old car and y'all can identify the make model, differences in tailights and other obscure stuff.

The only reason that thread got finally whacked was because y'all knew too much and the cops didn't want to tip BSL off at the fact that his identity was finally known and he was being tailed. I know the cops got countless bits of vital info from here.

Then to find out that one of our posters who was participating in it had a sister who was engaged to BSL so he went to the police with all of the info.

You guys are doing great work here. Keep on digging and exposing the truth and standing up for what is right. If the STPSO won't do it, the OT will.

Posted by gingerkittie
Member since Aug 2013
2675 posts
Posted on 9/15/17 at 10:44 am to
I just wanted to pass along this post from the Justice for Nanette FB page LINK

"The Watson Family would like to thank you ALL from the bottom of our hearts for your support of Nan. It means so much more to us than you could ever know. Without you, we couldn't have done all that we have so far. This week has had major ups and downs, but Nan was vindicated - she did not do this to herself or her pets and this is FINALLY being called a murder. They know that we are all watching and the truth will be brought to light. #justicefornanette"


This is exactly why this thread needs to continue. Nan's supporters need people like the OT out there pushing and asking questions and finding some answers and pushing some more.

Their battle has really just begun but now they finally have some real traction and they need the momentum needs to keep pushing forward. So keep up the good work. You know what a difference you made in Mickey Shunick's case.

Thank you OT. You guys can be such clowns and smartasses (which i actually love about ya'll) and then you turn around and do great things like this thread.

I can honestly say that there more inside info that I want to reveal. I want to make sure that I don't hurt the case in any way by revealing too much, too soon. I'm honestly walking a fine line because I could ending up outting myself over this.

Even if you have no info or insight, each post of support keeps this thread going.

Hell, i was wishing last night i could buy some of ya'll beers. Wish Chicken could set up a way for me to send y'all beer thru the OT. Now THAT would be a feature on the new format that I could really appreciate!

This post was edited on 9/15/17 at 10:50 am
Posted by Hangit
The Green Swamp
Member since Aug 2014
39115 posts
Posted on 9/15/17 at 11:05 am to
Where was the footage from the multiple video cameras stored? It would have been damaged if on site but if sent somewhere else an arrest must be imminent.

Were there also high res cameras inside the home?
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
146755 posts
Posted on 9/15/17 at 11:17 am to
I just find the case interesting because I saw it here and I have a lot of firefighters and a fire inspector-- in my family and it is such a strange case that a police Chief's home catches on fire like this, esp after his wife and dog(s) are dead inside...

In the article I posted above; how can they rule out anybody for murdering her at this stage?
Posted by BRgetthenet
Member since Oct 2011
117701 posts
Posted on 9/15/17 at 11:19 am to
quote:

In the article I posted above; how can they rule out anybody for murdering her at this stage?



Technically, you can't.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
146755 posts
Posted on 9/15/17 at 11:20 am to
,
This post was edited on 9/15/17 at 11:59 am
Posted by gingerkittie
Member since Aug 2013
2675 posts
Posted on 9/15/17 at 11:30 am to
quote:

Where was the footage from the multiple video cameras stored? It would have been damaged if on site but if sent somewhere else an arrest must be imminent.

Were there also high res cameras inside the home?


Steve had extensive security cams on the property (as that as the business his late father in). So he likely had good cams and knew how to work them. But that also means he knew how to manipulate them too, if he needed deal with any self-incriminating footage. Knowing him i would imagine he used them in some way to create his alibi.

I dont know if any cams were in the home though. I will ask a friend and find out.

I do wonder who is the last person on the cams. I would imagine it could be steve leaving and that Nanette is not seen alive on them after that time.

I have always been suspicious that the fire was set to cover up the exact time of death, along with other evidence. From what I understand, the last time anyone spoke with her was on Thursday ( the fire was on Friday).

I also wonder if they were able to recover her phone and any evidence on that?

i will try to find out the answers to all of the questions here. There is more that i would like to reveal but i am being cautious. Stevie is an awfully lawsuit-happy man. Plus when people confide in me, i have to make sure I have their permission to reveal things and/or that i have some type of proof to back up what i say.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
146755 posts
Posted on 9/15/17 at 11:41 am to
quote:


tigerbutt

Kill this thread for Christ sake.
why? and it wouldn't be for Christs sake.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
146755 posts
Posted on 9/15/17 at 1:50 pm to
who would shoot a woman in the head and then light the house on fire? It wasn't a robbery, a hit made to look weird? in a lot of domestic violence type cases; the man can do a lot to get the wife out of the way if he has a GF? Who knows?
Posted by gingerkittie
Member since Aug 2013
2675 posts
Posted on 9/17/17 at 5:54 pm to
quote:

An interesting comment on the story about Steve being "cleared". It is from the "Concerned citizens of St Tammany" FB page.


quote:

We the Public, would like a clear explanation of why Sheriff Smith discounts not one, but three independent forensic conclusions that Nanette's death was a Homicide.

There is still NO mention of the alleged decapitation of one or more of the Family pets, whether a Firearm was recovered from the scene, or what the many security cameras along the very long driveway have revealed.

Steve's father owned and operated a very well known security company and had the BEST of cameras on the Private Property. Why was a former St. Tammany Fire Dist. #12 employee that is currently employed with the Louisiana State Fire Marshall's Office as an Inspector allowed to lead the Investigation? He is an Inspector, NOT an Investigator.

Lets discuss these topics at length to rule out the many scenarios. Or, turn the case over to the FBI. I find it odd that there are way too many conflicts of interests in this case. Nanette's Family deserve closure and the case brought to Justice without prejudice.


I find it particularly disturbing that there is someone on the loose who has alegedly decapitated an animal. Why is it we learn these things from the public and not from the sheriff?

Now I can understand holding some info back , but to just act for months like it was a suicide, then state you don't necessarily believe it is a homicide after 3 autopsies and then to clear the husband within 24 hours of finally "believing " it is a homicide is crazy.

Suicide should have been ruled out almost immediately with the discovery a gruesomely murdered pet.

Still, smith seems quite content and calm with this kind of a killer on the loose. He is content to let the investigation drag on and go cold. Frankly they have never treated it as a hot case anyway.

Is it because they already know who it is and don't want to press charges on a friend of theirs?

Is because they know that this was a deeply personal crime and don't think others are in danger because this was of how personal and targeted this attack was?

Do the citizens of St Tammany feel safe with a pet-killer/murderer/arsonist on the loose?

I think this crime is just the tip of the iceberg. The killer seems to be a psychopath and there is likely so much more to the story but smith is too busy brushing it aside to confront it for what it is and to actively pursue it.

Smith wants us to know the STPSO is still actively investigating this case. Well if they are pursuing with all of the motivation that have already shown in the case then the killer will never be found unless Nan's family does it themselves!

ETA: LINK

" Court documents, filed by the family to get an independent autopsy done on Nanette, indicate the animals were shot too."
This post was edited on 9/17/17 at 6:03 pm
Posted by tigerpimpbot
Chairman of the Pool Board
Member since Nov 2011
66928 posts
Posted on 9/17/17 at 7:13 pm to
quote:

Court documents, filed by the family to get an independent autopsy done on Nanette, indicate the animals were shot too."


That's fricked up. I hope they get some competent investigators on the case
This post was edited on 9/17/17 at 7:14 pm
Posted by gingerkittie
Member since Aug 2013
2675 posts
Posted on 9/17/17 at 7:32 pm to
quote:

That's fricked up. I hope they get some competent investigators on the case


I think the case definitely needs to be given over to another LE agency that the St Tammany police.It needs to be investigated by an agency that can be totally objective. Steve knows too many people.

As for smith saying steve has fully cooperated and blah, blah blah... Well don't the perps often try to insert themselves into the crime afterwards? Steve owned and operated and had access to the video and security cams that were looked at to clear him. That kinda puts them in doubt.

WHY did it take Nan's family raising funds to get a different autopsy to get a ruling of homicide?

Why would have even been considered a suicide in the first place?

Shouldn't steve have been the first one to say this is a homicide and my wife would never murder our her pets and to vow to get justice?

Lest anyone think i am just targeting steve, I have also offered his brother "b" as a good suspect (based upon inside info, his history with Nan and his police record)

Also odd, can anyone find a link to any of the stories that ran saying this case was a likely suicide? I have googled and not found any. Where did they go?
This post was edited on 9/17/17 at 7:35 pm
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
34144 posts
Posted on 9/17/17 at 8:30 pm to
Did I hear correctly that the Coroner says it was murder but that the Sheriff said he doesn't agree with his findings? IIRC the Coroner said that she had no soot in her mouth or throat indicating that she was dead before the fire started. There seems to be some major disagreement between the Coroner and the Sheriff.
Jump to page
Page First 10 11 12 13 14 ... 27
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 12 of 27Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram