- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why Is it illegal to have a woman sign a contract, stating that she wont get pregnant
Posted on 8/5/17 at 3:05 pm to RummelTiger
Posted on 8/5/17 at 3:05 pm to RummelTiger
Hey, I was not the one who said female employee, pregnant, and bullish in same breath
Pig....
Pig....
Posted on 8/5/17 at 3:12 pm to RummelTiger
quote:
RummelTiger
Stick to the weather threads.
Posted on 8/5/17 at 3:15 pm to LakeViewLSU
quote:
Stick to the weather threads.
Sorry to ruin your troll party...
Posted on 8/5/17 at 3:17 pm to LakeViewLSU
Rummel is right in this thread. You have people like Cubes who want to find out if a woman may have kids or not asking simply retarded questions most corporations would fire him over like "What is your home life like?" He has openly admitted that he asks that question so he knows who not to hire, so why would anyone ask that stupid question that opens them up for a lawsuit? Is there any legal rational reason to ask that question?
Posted on 8/5/17 at 3:18 pm to LakeViewLSU
quote:i agree, but i'm an employer. i hired a girl that was pregnant, and i didn't know it. she worked until the same day she delivered. she proved my worrying was for nothing.
before hiring? Pregnancy is a big deal, and a potential employer should know whether the woman intends to get pregnant and take time off.
Posted on 8/5/17 at 3:19 pm to RummelTiger
I think I did a good thing, in bringing awareness to womens rights, and sexism in the workplace.
I think a lot of people have learned something from this thread that will help them avoid situtaions in which they may be violating a woman's right to work.
I think a lot of people have learned something from this thread that will help them avoid situtaions in which they may be violating a woman's right to work.
This post was edited on 8/5/17 at 3:20 pm
Posted on 8/5/17 at 3:21 pm to LakeViewLSU
quote:
I think I did a good thing, in bringing awareness to womens rights, and sexism in the workplace.
I think a lot of people have learned something from this thread that will help them avoid situtaions in which they may be violating a woman's right to work.
So...you're welcome?
Posted on 8/5/17 at 3:21 pm to LakeViewLSU
every thread you make is with the intent to instigate. you just suck at it.
Posted on 8/5/17 at 3:22 pm to LSUgirl4
quote:
every thread you make is with the intent to instigate. you just suck at it.
Thats not true at all. Its called opening up a dialogue.
This post was edited on 8/5/17 at 3:24 pm
Posted on 8/5/17 at 3:23 pm to RummelTiger
quote:
So...you're welcome?
Yes, I think you played a valuable role.
Posted on 8/5/17 at 3:53 pm to LakeViewLSU
Everyone complains about women staying home and being leeches but then complain they may get pregnant. Good Lord, how do you expect to have families and perpetuate the human race. They are damned it they don't and damned if they do!
Posted on 8/5/17 at 4:29 pm to SNAKERIVER
A lot of loophole lawyers in this thread
Eta:
I've never been sued. My company has never been sued. I'll take my chances. But, I appreciate all the advice .
I'll keep being successful with all my hires.
If I do get sued, I promise I'll bump this thread and eat some crow.
Eta:
I've never been sued. My company has never been sued. I'll take my chances. But, I appreciate all the advice .
If I do get sued, I promise I'll bump this thread and eat some crow.
This post was edited on 8/5/17 at 4:32 pm
Posted on 8/5/17 at 4:39 pm to crazycubes
quote:
A lot of loophole lawyers in this thread
No, just HR/People professionals that are actually trying to help you.
quote:
I've never been sued. My company has never been sued. I'll take my chances. But, I appreciate all the advice . I'll keep being successful with all my hires.
Congrats. I would ask, are you against doing things differently? Maybe changing how you ask questions in order to get better answers? I'm happy that you've been successful with your hires - would you want to honestly divulge on here what your turnover is...per department, per role...if applicable? What kind of business are you in? What city? Do you have a dedicated HR person/team?
Posted on 8/5/17 at 4:39 pm to LakeViewLSU
How long should this contract be? Is it good for the life of her employment? For just a few years? Until menopause?
If I got those questions, I would assume I'm not getting the job. I wouldn't sue over it.
If I got those questions, I would assume I'm not getting the job. I wouldn't sue over it.
Posted on 8/5/17 at 5:14 pm to LakeViewLSU
You should ask about being pregnant. In fact, you should add how you find them incredibly sexy, with their swollen breasts and leaking milk. I'm sure they'll totally feel better about the interview after hearing your comments. 
Posted on 8/5/17 at 5:43 pm to RummelTiger
First off, I agree it isn't an over blown situation. That being said, it isn't wrong for a business to want to be protected. The situations I am referring to are when they have insurance benefits as well as a paid maternity leave coupled with fmla. It isn't uncommon for women to wait till the last minute to say I quit. The business lost resources on an employee that they never saw real returns from. Also, they held that position open for them while try could have had a new hire in place.
Posted on 8/5/17 at 5:59 pm to NoHoTiger
quote:
How long should this contract be? Is it good for the life of her employment? For just a few years? Until menopause?
And can we null and void said contract if we are rendered infertile? Can I get compensation for getting my tubes tied?
quote:
If I got those questions, I would assume I'm not getting the job. I wouldn't sue over it.
Better yet, if I got those questions I'd probably decide I wouldn't want to work there to begin with. Especially if I'm of an age to start a family.
Given the rate in which undesirable people are procreating, we probably need to be creating a better workplace environment for our more intelligent workforce to have families.
Posted on 8/5/17 at 6:24 pm to BluegrassBelle
I agree with you Belle. The company I work for is very pro-family for men and women. They let me leave early, come in late and take time off for my niece. I can imagine how great it is if I actually had my own kids.
Posted on 8/5/17 at 7:07 pm to LakeViewLSU
Don't hire a woman to do a man's job.
If the position will be tough to cover for 3 months (or whatever ridiculous length of time they take off these days) do not include child bearing age females as possibles.
If the position will be tough to cover for 3 months (or whatever ridiculous length of time they take off these days) do not include child bearing age females as possibles.
Posted on 8/5/17 at 7:11 pm to LakeViewLSU
While a no-no, I kinda agree with the OP. My boss made a joke the other day because our department is childless and he intends for it to stay that way. I was just introduced to paternity leave. WTF?
Popular
Back to top


0










