- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Why do viruses have patents?
Posted on 5/8/23 at 8:10 pm
Posted on 5/8/23 at 8:10 pm
I went down a rabbit hole and discovered this. Does anyone know why?
5
Posted on 5/8/23 at 8:13 pm to gmac8604
(no message)
This post was edited on 9/11/25 at 6:20 am
Posted on 5/8/23 at 8:13 pm to gmac8604
So someone can claim to killing millions.
Posted on 5/8/23 at 8:24 pm to Odysseus32
So our patent office is protecting synthetic and natural discoveries?
Posted on 5/8/23 at 8:29 pm to gmac8604
Bc viruses were invented by the liberal elite to keep down the blue collar, christian, straight cis white man 
Smallpox and measles were both funded directly by George Soros
Smallpox and measles were both funded directly by George Soros
Posted on 5/8/23 at 8:34 pm to tigerbutt
quote:
So someone can claim to killing millions.
The Chinese Government? I’m not talking about the citizens of China that the Chinese government kills and most people don’t blink an eye. I’m talking about the millions around the world, the same government killed with a virus and half the people in this country would call me some type of made up names for simply telling the truth.
Posted on 5/8/23 at 8:36 pm to gmac8604
quote:
Why do viruses have patents?
Diamond v Chakrabarty
Posted on 5/8/23 at 8:44 pm to gmac8604
(no message)
This post was edited on 9/11/25 at 6:20 am
Posted on 5/8/23 at 9:10 pm to Odysseus32
It was a genuine question. No need to engage defenses. Just wondering why.
Posted on 5/8/23 at 9:15 pm to gizmoflak
quote:
Diamond v Chakrabarty
35 USC 101: new and useful manufacture or composition of matter. In Diamond, it was a bacteria that broke down crude.
Posted on 5/8/23 at 9:25 pm to gizmoflak
I read the case argument as it was a man-made living organism, which would categorize it as synthetic, yeah? They just included it, along with naturally made organisms, as matter.
Posted on 5/8/23 at 9:31 pm to gmac8604
quote:It went viral.
I went down a rabbit hole and discovered this. Does anyone know why?
Duh.
Posted on 5/8/23 at 9:37 pm to soccerfüt
Nice play on words. I caught it.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News