Started By
Message

re: Why do pro-weed advocates ignore the fact

Posted on 6/8/21 at 10:06 pm to
Posted by MoarKilometers
Member since Apr 2015
20505 posts
Posted on 6/8/21 at 10:06 pm to
quote:

but please spare us the health benefits of weed.

Here's the US patent on cannabinoids, as a nueroprotectant antioxidant of all things... as held by our department of health
Posted by Ba Ba Boooey
Northshore
Member since May 2010
4729 posts
Posted on 6/8/21 at 10:06 pm to
Posted by Sun God
Member since Jul 2009
49775 posts
Posted on 6/8/21 at 10:06 pm to
I hope you didn’t drink three beers in the last two hours
Posted by DMagic
#ChowderPosse
Member since Aug 2010
49911 posts
Posted on 6/8/21 at 10:07 pm to
Totes bud ice has the penguins son
Posted by inadaze
Member since Aug 2010
5175 posts
Posted on 6/8/21 at 10:12 pm to
That answer was about cannabis. If you want something more, specify it. I'll answer your question.
Posted by Sun God
Member since Jul 2009
49775 posts
Posted on 6/8/21 at 10:16 pm to
What is high tolerance for booze v. weed
Posted by inadaze
Member since Aug 2010
5175 posts
Posted on 6/8/21 at 10:16 pm to
Cannabis is such a useful and beneficial plant all-around.

Some people don't like the effects of getting "high". I get that, but it never should have been illegal. The history of propaganda is tragic.
Posted by Sun God
Member since Jul 2009
49775 posts
Posted on 6/8/21 at 10:17 pm to
Agreed
Posted by inadaze
Member since Aug 2010
5175 posts
Posted on 6/8/21 at 10:44 pm to
On average, the drinker is more dangerous than the cannabis user.
Cannabis tolerance is different in that when it's built up, the effects of getting high are subtle. A person with a high tolerance can just keep smoking, and they're not going to be that impaired. Whereas, the more drunk a person gets, the more reckless and impaired they are.

The tolerance takes time to build up. I can't say X-number of times smoking = high tolerance. There are too many variables.

Eating cannabis has a different effect than smoking, though. The smoking high comes on quick and isn't as strong. Eating may take about an hour for the effects to come in, but it's going to be a much stronger effect. Based on my experience, an experienced cannabis user is still probably going to be okay, but driving is not a good idea in my opinion. Especially because some people talk about super strong effects (e.g., visuals) on edibles.
This post was edited on 6/8/21 at 10:46 pm
Posted by Mr. Misanthrope
Cloud 8
Member since Nov 2012
6334 posts
Posted on 6/8/21 at 10:44 pm to
quote:

He didn't ask a question. He asked five. I gave him a succint answer.
To be fair to the guy, you didn’t. To be fair to you, here’s essentially was what I was wondering.
quote:

I’ve seen drivers put through driving maneuvers sober, then one beer, then two beers, and so on demonstrating the clear connection between alcohol ingestion and impaired driving. Has serious testing been done in this manner respecting marijuana?
Posted by inadaze
Member since Aug 2010
5175 posts
Posted on 6/8/21 at 10:58 pm to
Do you not have access to Google?

Cannabis and Driving: A Scientific And Rational Review

I tried to give you a succinct answer. I don't think people should be driving impaired. But honestly, I did it all the time with a group of friends in high school without issue.
Posted by goldennugget
NIL Ruined College Sports
Member since Jul 2013
26021 posts
Posted on 6/8/21 at 11:06 pm to
I hate weed and weed smokers so at least you have someone on your side OP
Posted by Arthur Bach
Member since Jul 2016
2910 posts
Posted on 6/8/21 at 11:26 pm to
quote:

Actually it went exactly as I expected.


quote:

This has been a successful thread though


quote:

I hope they tax the hell out of it. Makes bank for the government


Posted by BigDawg0420
Hamsterdam
Member since Apr 2010
7496 posts
Posted on 6/9/21 at 12:15 am to
quote:

it’s just funny to see them lose their minds and come out like roaches in defense of their roaches.


Those roaches made you look like an uneducated, arse backwards buffoon.
Posted by SlidellCajun
Slidell la
Member since May 2019
15918 posts
Posted on 6/9/21 at 7:42 am to
That patent application ignores the negative health benefits completely!
And none of the supposed health benefits listed are actually proven!

And tell us- do you smoke or Ingest weed for its health benefits?
Bet not
You just want to get high
Posted by MoarKilometers
Member since Apr 2015
20505 posts
Posted on 6/9/21 at 9:08 am to
quote:

I hate weed and weed smokers so at least you have someone on your side OP

Totally explains why you rage punch armored vehicles
Posted by MoarKilometers
Member since Apr 2015
20505 posts
Posted on 6/9/21 at 9:13 am to
quote:

And tell us- do you smoke or Ingest weed for its health benefits?
Bet not
You just want to get high

Getting high is the health benefit There are 2 types of cannabinoid receptors (cb1 and cb2) littered throughout your body, and in most organs. We were either designed to consume cannabis or we evolved into it. Either way, the science says our body is made for it.
Posted by Champagne
Sabine Free State.
Member since Oct 2007
53413 posts
Posted on 6/9/21 at 9:17 am to
Pardon me for interrupting you. I thought that you were going to say something intelligent.
Posted by sabes que
Member since Jan 2010
10156 posts
Posted on 6/9/21 at 9:22 am to
It also is proven to reduce inflammation throughout the body(which inflammation is the cause of a whole myriad of issues). Also increases blood flow, which is also beneficial to health.
Posted by S
RIP Wayde
Member since Jan 2007
168631 posts
Posted on 6/9/21 at 9:22 am to
630th downvote
Jump to page
Page First 8 9 10 11 12
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 10 of 12Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram