- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why are homeownership rates precipitously declining?
Posted on 8/31/16 at 11:41 am to RealityTiger
Posted on 8/31/16 at 11:41 am to RealityTiger
There are programs out there like FHA loans that allow you to only put up 3.5% down. Yes, you will have to pay the PMI but you can affordably own a house without putting down a ton of money.
This post was edited on 8/31/16 at 11:42 am
Posted on 8/31/16 at 11:51 am to CorporateTiger
Ya, Austin definitely made us nervous since we knew it already has run up for some time and unlike New Orleans, you can actually build out from downtown, which the MS River and Ponchartrain prevent, which puts demand on those homes in Orleans parish.
The house we ended up offering on has come down 60k or so from when they originally listed it and had been sitting awhile, so hopefully we've mitigated some downside there. That's pretty much been our MO for our two purchases. Find something we like that has been sitting too long.
But yes, certainly more worrisome than just checking rental rates and picking one. If you don't like the price after a year, move.
The house we ended up offering on has come down 60k or so from when they originally listed it and had been sitting awhile, so hopefully we've mitigated some downside there. That's pretty much been our MO for our two purchases. Find something we like that has been sitting too long.
But yes, certainly more worrisome than just checking rental rates and picking one. If you don't like the price after a year, move.
This post was edited on 8/31/16 at 11:52 am
Posted on 8/31/16 at 11:57 am to CorporateTiger
quote:
The idea that all (or pretty much all) land infinitely appreciates is ridiculous.
Yes, but renting will always go up and never acquire any value.
If you do it 'right' and buy a house with a 15 year mortgage at a reasonable price then by age 55-60 you should own your home and stop having to pay rent. There's plenty of ways to not do it that way, but that doesn't undermine the fact that owning a home the right way will long term be far and away the cheapest method.
Posted on 8/31/16 at 12:04 pm to baldona
quote:
Yes, but renting will always go up and never acquire any value.
Renting doesn't necessarily always go up, but you are correct that it doesn't build equity.
quote:
If you do it 'right' and buy a house with a 15 year mortgage at a reasonable price then by age 55-60 you should own your home and stop having to pay rent.
That is a great dream, but it is much harder to realize now than it used to be. Even within one city, my company has three locations scattered about an honor from each other. Over the next fifteen years I can (and probably will) get moved between those locations. Plus there is a significant chance I get moved away from this city. The safe choice is to buy in the city (which is a protection against depreciation and job movements), but that comes at a higher price which changed the timeline.
Even outside of those risks, if development moves away from your suburb or a Sec. 8 development comes in nearby then your investment can go upside down pretty quickly. Further for that whole time you are carrying my almost as many non-equity bearing costs as I am anyway. I am essentially risk free though.
Posted on 8/31/16 at 12:05 pm to baldona
quote:
There's plenty of ways to not do it that way, but that doesn't undermine the fact that owning a home the right way will long term be far and away the cheapest method.
Posted on 8/31/16 at 12:09 pm to rocket31
Too many older folks are still of the mindset that you can put down roots, take a job, and be there for your whole life. With how transitory the current job market can be, it just doesn't work that way anymore.
Posted on 8/31/16 at 12:15 pm to CorporateTiger
I looked at this recent home search as thinking that many jobs will move to remote positions so I better like where I'm living.
My wife, also a blood sucking lawyer, has no reason to be at the office. Her boss already doesn't come in many days and works from home. If you aren't litigating and dealing with opposing counsel, and just shuffling transaction "paper" there is no reason to be there. Except old habits die hard of course.
My wife, also a blood sucking lawyer, has no reason to be at the office. Her boss already doesn't come in many days and works from home. If you aren't litigating and dealing with opposing counsel, and just shuffling transaction "paper" there is no reason to be there. Except old habits die hard of course.
This post was edited on 8/31/16 at 12:16 pm
Posted on 8/31/16 at 12:25 pm to gorillacoco
quote:
There are a ton of people in this country who are upside down on their mortgages through factors that they couldn't control.
I agree with this. The whole "gig/contract" economy has made many people more risk averse to owning. Good luck if you're a homeowner and ever on the receiving end of a pink slip from your employer.
Posted on 8/31/16 at 12:25 pm to CorporateTiger
quote:agreed, that's why I live way outside Houston
Tons of those around Houston
Posted on 8/31/16 at 12:29 pm to crazycubes
I like how in Houston you can buy your own little skyscraper/apartment building as your home.
They really cram those any where they can build them inside the loop.
They really cram those any where they can build them inside the loop.
Posted on 8/31/16 at 12:52 pm to CorporateTiger
quote:
That is a great dream, but it is much harder to realize now than it used to be.
No its not. In many aspects it may be easier. You are looking to buy a home in a fictitious bubble, that's not life. That doesn't mean there is a good chance you will lose money. Rates are super low, in the 80s rates were 8-10%+. Yet many people did it. We have websites like Zillow and the property appraisers are all online now so you can see housing prices and trends almost instantly. You could never do that in the past, without spending days of work you had no idea in the 1990s and before what houses sold for outside of what your Realtor told youl
Section 8 housing and neighborhoods don't change that much over time. If you buy in a neighborhood of $200k houses they aren't going to turn to section 8, that's a laughable idea.
I'm not saying you can buy any house and live there forever care free. But there are plenty of ways to conservatively buy a house even if you plan to move every 4-5 years that will get you to owning a home outright between 50-60 years of age.
Most people that are still underwater on their house were "investing" in some way or another. They sold their first house for a huge profit and got greedy and bought up planning to sell that one quickly, and the bubble burst. That bubble was a 2 or 3 years in a century type of thing, and if you didn't see the risk at the time you had your head in the sand.
This post was edited on 8/31/16 at 12:54 pm
Posted on 8/31/16 at 1:07 pm to Cooter Davenport
quote:
It takes an infinite amount of time for a house to be worth nothing (as in it won't happen) because the LAND VALUE is always going up even as the house deteriorates. I've made a lot of $ off of dumps because people wanted the lot to tear the house down and build a new house to sell for even more. Stop buying suburb houses, people! Those things don't appreciate and not as much of the value is in the LAND! Buy a small old house in the city in a desirable area with a 15 year loan, hold it a few years, do a few repairs, or nothing, and then sell it for a profit and buy a nicer, more desirable place and repeat.
Hahaha....that's the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard. The problem with your thought process is that you assume everyone wants to be in the city? There will always be a group of people that prefer to be in the suburbs...or "country". Not only that but crime is usually higher in cities and schools are historically not as good. So...good luck raising your kids in inner cities and paying for high priced private school. Oh, and news flash....population will continue to increase thus the "suburbs" will one day become towns which will then become cities which include commercial real estate. This may take decades but it will happen so don't be so black and white in your assessments of property values.
In addition, the statement that suburb houses don't appreciate as fast is about as narrow minded as your statement regarding the land value of inner city property. Buying land within a city can go south as fast as it can go north.
This post was edited on 8/31/16 at 1:09 pm
Posted on 8/31/16 at 1:09 pm to baldona
quote:
No its not. In many aspects it may be easier. You are looking to buy a home in a fictitious bubble, that's not life
By the time everyone realizes a bubble is a bubble it is too late. That's kinda the nature of the beast. I'm not say there is a huge bubble (if I thought so, I wouldn't be looking). What I am saying is that if you are taking a house as an investment you have to factor in some risk of a downturn in the market.
quote:
Rates are super low, in the 80s rates were 8-10%+. Yet many people did it. We have websites like Zillow and the property appraisers are all online now so you can see housing prices and trends almost instantly. You could never do that in the past, without spending days of work you had no idea in the 1990s and before what houses sold for outside of what your Realtor told youl
Yes rates are good right now, but making a bad move because you can get a good rate isn't a good choice. That is similar thinking to people getting adjustable rate mortgages. Buy a house you can afford and feel secure in your investment, don't make hasty moves based on rates. Yes we have more access to information now, but that doesn't actually lead to any competitive advantage in the market since everyone has the same information.
quote:
Section 8 housing and neighborhoods don't change that much over time. If you buy in a neighborhood of $200k houses they aren't going to turn to section 8, that's a laughable idea.
You don't understand how neighborhoods work and how this stuff affects the urban core. Sure they aren't going to go bulldoze $200,000 houses to build Sec. 8 (though $200,00 is probably worth a lot less than you think it is in a big city). They can and will though put Sec. 8 properties in area near your gentrification. You wind up buying into an area you think is up and coming until 5 years down the road, the gentrified area is surrounded by Sec. 8 housing and/or rapidly deteriorating private apartments.
I've been looking at houses. This literally does happen because I've seen it.
quote:
I'm not saying you can buy any house and live there forever care free. But there are plenty of ways to conservatively buy a house even if you plan to move every 4-5 years that will get you to owning a home outright between 50-60 years of age.
If things go according to plan, yes. If you go upside down on a mortgage or two... Or have to pay some big out of pocket maintenance then that plan can be shot to shite. As I've said I'm looking to buy, so I don't think it is an awful move. Right now the rental market is really good though.
quote:
That bubble was a 2 or 3 years in a century type of thing, and if you didn't see the risk at the time you had your head in the sand.
This is laughable.
Posted on 8/31/16 at 1:13 pm to Paul Allen
I make around 50k a year. I can either rent a nice place with a bad location, a meh place with a great location, or get the worst of both worlds and buy a crappy place in a shitty location.
The idea that I can properly invest in my future, have an active social life, and still afford a mortgage payment/upkeep on a house is laughable in today's day and age.
The idea that I can properly invest in my future, have an active social life, and still afford a mortgage payment/upkeep on a house is laughable in today's day and age.
Posted on 8/31/16 at 1:39 pm to Cooter Davenport
quote:That is an absolutely ridiculous statement. Millennials are the ones moving back into the city to live in Old small houses with character, as apposed to the 3000 sqft cookie cutter McMansions gen X and the baby boomers swoon over
Today, millinials are aghast if you suggest that they inhabit less than 3,200 SF.
Posted on 8/31/16 at 1:44 pm to Cooter Davenport
quote:
Today, millinials are aghast if you suggest that they inhabit less than 3,200 SF.
Flat out not true.
In my office alone, there are three men who bought a house just this year (so far). Two of those guys are millennials (I'm one of the two).
The millenials' houses are 2200 sq ft. Apiece.
The baby boomer's house tops 5k
In fact, I can't think of more than two or three of my millenial friends who have houses over 3k sq ft. Hell, most of the ones i know that do own homes below that are contemplating downsizing.
This post was edited on 8/31/16 at 1:45 pm
Posted on 8/31/16 at 1:46 pm to TbirdSpur2010
quote:It was a terrible statement. Millennials are actually known for the opposite. Cramming into a 500sqft shoe box because it is in a great location
Flat out not true.
In my office alone, there are three men who bought a house just this year (so far). Two of those guys are millennials (I'm one of the two).
The millenials' houses are 2200 sq ft. Apiece.
The baby boomer's house tops 5k
In fact, I can't think of more than two or three of my millenial friends who have houses over 3k sq ft. Hell, most of the ones i know that do own homes below that are contemplating downsizing.
This post was edited on 8/31/16 at 1:46 pm
Posted on 8/31/16 at 1:50 pm to baldona
quote:
Section 8 housing and neighborhoods don't change that much over time. If you buy in a neighborhood of $200k houses they aren't going to turn to section 8, that's a laughable idea.
There is a significant push in larger cities to incorporate "scattered housing" for Section 8 and low-income families. The neighborhood across from my parent's in Louisville, when the houses initially went on market, were around $180,000 (keep in mind this was 10 years ago). The developers tapped into a HUD grant that allows low-income families to move in at a significantly discounted rate because of the kickbacks they get.
Add to it that through scattered housing for strictly Section 8, the apartments on the other side of their neighborhood have been taken over by Section 8 families. And it's depreciated the value of their home.
Posted on 8/31/16 at 1:50 pm to YumYum Sauce
quote:
I knew this would be said at some point in this thread. Probably because the baby boomers have been preaching about the american dream since we were fricking born. You've priced us out of it. Not ourselves. It costs far more to live the same comfortable lifestyle today than it did for you lazy fricks living in the 60s and 70s. Have we constantly raised tuition, housing prices, and everything else? No, that was you assholes. Hurry up and die.
What does an engineer, attorney, Doctor, hell even a skilled plumber, electrician craftsman make now versus 1970?
My father put 6 kids through school and traveled with them as upper middle class small business owner and I bet he never took home more than 40k a year. I do essentially the same business for many times more than 40. It's all relative.
Buy or rent is a personal choice and not one fits all. I've always been if the mindset to buy-houses, other real estate, vehicles etc...rather than rent of lease and I've always done well with my choices. I buy a vehicle, pay it off and drive it for years without owing anything and it's a savings for me. Plenty of friends who lease vehicles, pay a ton but don't care about a car note and like a new vehicle every couple of years.
Peoples tastes, habits and lifestyles change over all generations and most people know how to adapt.
My best advice to anyone? Live within your means whether renting or buying and quit blaming all of the worlds problems on other people. Your kids will blame you for sucking up good oxygen. If you are going to be bitter than perhaps you should just die as well.
Posted on 8/31/16 at 1:52 pm to Paul Allen
Well, there was this massive shite storm in 2008...........
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News