Started By
Message

re: Who is the GOAT of all U.S generals?

Posted on 9/27/23 at 6:50 pm to
Posted by BFIV
Virginia
Member since Apr 2012
8332 posts
Posted on 9/27/23 at 6:50 pm to
quote:

Forrest slaughtered a few hundred surrendered American soldiers for fun.




False. Never happened.
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
68325 posts
Posted on 9/27/23 at 7:03 pm to
quote:

You need to do more research on D-Day. There was far from a certain prospect of victory.



Eisenhower didn't command shite on D-Day. He just gave the order to go. The battlefield commander that day was Montgomery and even he relied heavily on his two army commanders: Bradley and Dempsey. Bottom line, it's very difficult to rank generals from the 20th century as they were less involved with the tactical and more involved in the operational and strategic due to the incredible size of their armies.

Eisenhower can't be in this discussion as he never led troops in the field. The man was a great administrator and logistician. But a battlefield commander he was not.
This post was edited on 9/27/23 at 7:06 pm
Posted by TigerBR1111
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2014
7634 posts
Posted on 9/27/23 at 7:07 pm to
quote:

Eisenhower didn't command shite on D-Day.


The man carried the weight of the entire operation.

quote:

Eisenhower can't be in this discussion as he never led troops in the field. The man was a great administrator and logistician. But a battlefield commander he was not.


Read the OP subject line. You are only trying to set your own parameters
This post was edited on 9/27/23 at 7:10 pm
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
68325 posts
Posted on 9/27/23 at 7:10 pm to
quote:

The man carried the weight of the entire operation.



Sure. If it failed it was on him, but as soon as he gave the order to go he could do nothing but twiddle his thumbs and monitor reports coming in from the field. The success or failure of the invasion from that point forward depended on decisions made at the small unit level.
Posted by TigerBR1111
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2014
7634 posts
Posted on 9/27/23 at 7:12 pm to
quote:

Sure. If it failed it was on him, but as soon as he gave the order to go he could do nothing but twiddle his thumbs and monitor reports coming in from the field. The success or failure of the invasion from that point forward depended on decisions made at the small unit level.


That’s like saying a football coach is of no use once the game starts because it’s all on the players.
Eisenhower planned it for all of his generals to carry out
This post was edited on 9/27/23 at 7:13 pm
Posted by CSATiger
The Battlefield
Member since Aug 2010
6590 posts
Posted on 9/27/23 at 7:13 pm to
FDR then Truman, and Churchill made that deal
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
68325 posts
Posted on 9/27/23 at 7:21 pm to
quote:

That’s like saying a football coach is of no use once the game starts because it’s all on the players.


No, it’s not. Coaches can make adjustments to their tactics in real-time; Eisenhower could not.

quote:

Eisenhower planned it for all of his generals to carry out


Incorrect. The primary planner of Operation Overlord was Lt. General Frederick Morgan of COSSAC, the precursor to Eisenhower’s SHAEF.

Posted by greygoose
Member since Aug 2013
12757 posts
Posted on 9/27/23 at 7:28 pm to
quote:

I'm not sure what you expected Eisenhower to do in that situation.

Should've listened to Patton!
Posted by Neilfish
Member since Jun 2006
3161 posts
Posted on 9/27/23 at 7:29 pm to
You know this will turn racist, because most generals are all racist
Posted by sabbertooth
A Distant Planet
Member since Sep 2006
5665 posts
Posted on 9/27/23 at 7:33 pm to
Maurice Rose. Guy really knew how to get things done.
Posted by HonorThyWarEagle
I'm freakin' Freezin'
Member since Sep 2022
3006 posts
Posted on 9/27/23 at 7:35 pm to
quote:

certainly MacArthur for the majority of his career


McArthur didn't do himself a favor during the Korean War

His pro-nuke attitude was nice to read about
Posted by PSUMMERS
Ms
Member since Sep 2014
388 posts
Posted on 9/27/23 at 7:43 pm to
Washington based off of accomplishment.

Jackson off of audacity. I think he was a Christian Zealot. I think God took him out, his faith strong but his cause was not.

Grant he understood math and he didn’t let his ego rule him.
Posted by LemmyLives
Texas
Member since Mar 2019
10234 posts
Posted on 9/27/23 at 7:46 pm to
quote:

Eisenhower planned it for all of his generals to carry out


He also let Monty execute Market Garden. That's a strike.
Posted by Junky
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2005
8856 posts
Posted on 9/27/23 at 7:52 pm to
quote:

Running an entire fleet through a typhoon wasn't his best moment. Leaving Taffy 3 and the amphib groups unprotected at Leyte Gulf was his biggest blunder. So, no way is Halsey in the GOAT conversation.


Halsey is forgotten for what he did at the beginning of the war. He prosecuted the war with little resources. He set the navy up in those early years for what was to happen in ‘44 and ‘45. Even Spruance understood Halley’s efforts in those early war years. It’s easy to enjoy the later times when the fast attack fleet destroyed everything in its wake, it’s another thing to be tactful in your actions in the early years, when resources were scarce. That in of itself, puts Halsey up there.

Probably another admiral is Ching Lee. He was all-battleship and made the USS Washington his personal yacht. He understood and improved naval gunnery the likes of King was impressed by.

I also like Admiral Charles Lockwood. He was commander of South Pacific subs, then over all sub operations. He was another critical cog during those early years.

Plus, I mean, pre-war, when Admiral King was Capt of the Lexington, his admiral raised the flag of something along the lines of “proceed back to base” which was typically meant to fall in line behind the admiral’s flagship back to base. King took it upon himself to take Lex up to best speed and beat the fleet back by several hours. King knew submarine and naval aviation warfare. Two aspects that were critical to the US in those early years.
This post was edited on 9/27/23 at 8:37 pm
Posted by Sam Quint
Member since Sep 2022
7043 posts
Posted on 9/27/23 at 7:56 pm to
quote:

McArthur didn't do himself a favor during the Korean War

Agreed. I had several follow on posts about Macarthur after that one, not sure if you read the whole thread. And actually his performance in the Korean War was pretty legendary as well - the defense and breakout of Pusan, the landing at Inchon, etc. It was his inability to grasp that he was fighting a different kind of war after that (plus a noteworthy amount of hubris) that led to his charge to the Yalu and his ultimate downfall.

If he had retired right after driving the North Koreans out (and then stayed out of domestic politics afterwards) he would almost undoubtedly have gone down as one of the greatest Americans in history.

But sadly, what made him great ultimately led to his fall.
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 9/27/23 at 7:56 pm to
quote:




The correct answer.
Posted by Wolfhound45
Member since Nov 2009
121383 posts
Posted on 9/27/23 at 8:00 pm to
quote:

The correct answer.
Agreed. Arguably the first to understand modern, total war.
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
68325 posts
Posted on 9/27/23 at 8:08 pm to
quote:

I’m going to go out on a limb and say the OT has probably won’t say Grant


Of course they won't. But this is the obvious answer to your question.
Posted by LemmyLives
Texas
Member since Mar 2019
10234 posts
Posted on 9/27/23 at 8:16 pm to
He should have completely burned Atlanta to the ground.
Posted by Sus-Scrofa
Member since Feb 2013
9806 posts
Posted on 9/27/23 at 8:17 pm to
quote:

Agreed. Arguably the first to understand modern, total war.


If they ever wanted to make a good historical movie, his would be great

Dad dies, fostered with important family

West Point with a crap ton of future civil war players

Florida, Indian wars, then to California during the war with Mexico (much to his chagrin)

Shipwrecks, gold rush, banking

Stint at early LSU cut short by the civil war.

Accurately predicts what will happen during the war.

Maybe went crazy, redeems himself, civil war exploits. He was at Bull Run, Shiloh, teams up with Grant, Atlanta, through Georgia, South Carolina and the end of the war.

Heads the army when Grant becomes president.

More Indian wars.

Makes the most of his retirement as a living legend.

He was a crazy fricker. “Grant stood by me when I was crazy, and I stood by him when he was drunk, and now we stand by each other.”
This post was edited on 9/27/23 at 8:20 pm
Jump to page
Page First 8 9 10 11 12 ... 17
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 10 of 17Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram