Started By
Message

re: What’s the point of medical insurance?

Posted on 6/22/22 at 2:25 pm to
Posted by Hopeful Doc
Member since Sep 2010
14960 posts
Posted on 6/22/22 at 2:25 pm to
quote:

Isn’t out of pocket maximum set by your specific insurance policy? Or is that regulated by the giver meant (I genuinely don’t know.)



Little of column A, little of column B. Some HSA stats. You may have no more than $7050/individual, $14,100/family in out of pocket expenses for the plan to qualify. The minimums are also regulated ($1400/individual, $2800/family)

The HSA contribution, which is also regulated by the same body that is determining the above and these numbers, limits you to $3650/yr per individual HSA and $7300/yr per family HSA (you may not have an individual and a family HSA, even if you are covered by one HDHP and your spouse/children by another).


There are some sort of silly things about an HSA- namely they can act more or less as a retirement account/IRA-like account after the age of 65 (you may take distributions out that are taxed as income. Gains are not taxed if the money was invested).


I just think that if there's going to be a limit, it should be at/near the max out of pocket instead of an arbitrary number. Maybe it's tied to something (ie- the average MOOP, some multiple/fraction of it) that I am unaware of, but I think they're just two unrelated numbers. I think the goal is more or less to avoid the "abuse" of the "stealth IRA" which favors high earners.



quote:

I am a big fan of the HDHP’s that come with HSA’s


I am, too. While I do like the current "if your HSA is too big, you can use it as a retirement account" rule, I think the ability to say, "Hm. I need insurance. Most this is going to cost is X. I want to have X in the bank in a very protected account designated for this." early on and then making some simple/smart investing moves in that account is just a way to set yourself up for success. For a healthy person, they'll almost always come out ahead just investing the difference between the higher premium plan and the HDHP/HSA plan in an HSA, and the difference compounds pretty drastically if you avoid major costs for the first 5ish years of doing so.
Posted by dgnx6
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
68578 posts
Posted on 6/22/22 at 2:40 pm to
quote:

Then you have to pay a penalty in your taxes

Thanks, Obama


Not anymore, but it was a very piece of shite thing for him to do and lie about.
Posted by dgnx6
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
68578 posts
Posted on 6/22/22 at 2:43 pm to
quote:

I had a brain tumor removed in 2014.

Bill was- $388,000

I paid $4000 out of pocket.

I think I'll keep paying for my insurance



While this is a good reason to have it, if you kept paying and we all stopped, your insurance wouldnt be worth a shite. It takes all of us not using it for it to be worth it for someone like you.

Posted by oldcharlie8
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2012
7806 posts
Posted on 6/22/22 at 2:57 pm to
because my fricking monthly meds would cost a fortune
Posted by Roscoe14
Member since Jul 2021
171 posts
Posted on 6/22/22 at 3:29 pm to
Let me explain. You doctor has a list price for the procedure, but that is a meaningless number just picked out of the air. It bears no relation to what the procedure costs or what your doctor would accept to do the procedure. Rather, in order to be "in network" the doctor has to agree to accept UCR [usual and customary rates].
So the doctor sends the bill to the insurance company, which runs the bill through the UCR black box and it spits out a number. This is what the insurance company pays.
Posted by DiamondDog
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2019
10563 posts
Posted on 6/22/22 at 3:32 pm to
We had a baby. Wife was in the hospital 3 or 4 days. Think we paid around $2,000 total out of pocket.

The raw bill was over $100K. Blue Cross of course slashed that down to pennies. I think the daily rate was like $500/$600 bucks or some crap. Enough to how I didn't understand they made any money off us.
Posted by Topwater Trout
Red Stick
Member since Oct 2010
67589 posts
Posted on 6/22/22 at 3:39 pm to
quote:

insurance for healthcare is dumb.


until you spend a week in the hospital or have a major surgery
Posted by braindeadboxer
Utopia
Member since Nov 2011
8742 posts
Posted on 6/22/22 at 3:45 pm to
We’ve been conditioned to the think “insurance” is a deal compared to actual medical costs.

Go to a cash only system and see how quickly healthcare costs drop.

Our healthcare system serves to make medical providers AND insurance companies money. Medical providers have zero reason to minimize costs because health insurance companies pay it. Health insurance companies have no reason to force medical providers lower costs because they just pass the cost on to the insured.

I believe the percentage of folks who would save money over their lifetimes by paying cash as needed for care in lieu of health insurance outweigh folks who benefit.
Posted by braindeadboxer
Utopia
Member since Nov 2011
8742 posts
Posted on 6/22/22 at 3:47 pm to
quote:

until you spend a week in the hospital or have a major surgery


You’re week in a hospital or major surgery would less by several orders of magnitude if it weren’t for insurance companies.

Let’s see what happens to your premium after that hospital stay or surgery.

You can pay now, or you can pay more later. Health insurance isn’t a deal…
Posted by VanRIch
Wherever
Member since Sep 2007
10400 posts
Posted on 6/22/22 at 3:50 pm to
I have a lot of issues with insurance in general. But all the policies I carry ‘insure’ me that I won’t have to sell all my earthly possessions should the unexpected happen. For all their downfalls, that’s worth it to me. You never know when something might happen.
This post was edited on 6/22/22 at 3:51 pm
Posted by VanRIch
Wherever
Member since Sep 2007
10400 posts
Posted on 6/22/22 at 3:54 pm to
quote:

Think of anything else you insure, you’re car, your house, your business. It’s not for maintenance it for disaster.

I agree with this. So i have a high deductible plan to sort of combat this. My premiums are much lower and I very rarely get any benefits from it because we usually do not hit our deductible. All doc visits are out of pocket. But that’s always less than what I saved with the lower premium. It’s still expensive as hell but not nearly what a $25 copay plan costs.
Posted by Puffoluffagus
Savannah, GA
Member since Feb 2009
6097 posts
Posted on 6/22/22 at 3:54 pm to
quote:

Someone might have seen this, it was awhile back, but I want to say it was in Waco, Tx where an investigative reporter went to 3 different hospitals. I want to say two of them were only several blocks from each other, but they found out that for the same procedure, each hospital charged completely different prices. The cheapest was something like $2300.. The highest was $26k. I don't know if that is the exact numbers but there was a huge difference.



It's because in most cases it really is just an arbitrary number charged.


A hospital/provider/doctor etc. If in-network all have negotiated rates for costs of services with different insurance companies, Medicare/medicaid sets their rates Within some of these contracts, there may be reimbursement for certain services, materials, supplies, etc. That some insurers allow and others do not. There are some regulations as well that you cant charge a different price to someone based on their insurance or ability to pay. In order to maximize reimbursement, hospitals/doctors submit charges for everything whether or not your insurance may reimburse it(because someone else's insurance might and easier from an efficiency standpoint to do so), additionally because you can't charge different prices, the charged priced is some inflated number usually 1.5-2x the rate of medicare/cms, as some insurers may pay more than medicare some pay less. This is akin to basically throwing a bunch of mud of the wall and seeing what sticks.

This is also how we get these inflated charges but your insurances gets to say...look we saved you 200k with our discounts.
Posted by jclem11
Neoliberal Shill
Member since Nov 2011
7763 posts
Posted on 6/22/22 at 4:29 pm to
quote:

Catastrophic medical insurance should be covered federally by the gov’t in my opinion. All other procedures and MD visits should be out of pocket.


I thought this board hated big government and taxes and pulled themselves up by the bootstraps?

Are y'all turning into soyboys now?
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
68183 posts
Posted on 6/22/22 at 4:36 pm to
quote:

Costs for the medical procedures here vs the rest of the world is like 10 times as much.
The providers don't actually get paid what they bill. It's usually less than 20% in my experience when i or a family member have had a procedure.
This post was edited on 6/22/22 at 4:39 pm
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
68183 posts
Posted on 6/22/22 at 4:42 pm to
quote:


I thought this board hated big government and taxes and pulled themselves up by the bootstraps?
This board is littered with fake conservatives. Check out how many support vouchers so they can send their kids to private school at a discount. Or mention cutting TOPS off. They go ballistic.
Posted by pngtiger
Mobile
Member since May 2004
1819 posts
Posted on 6/22/22 at 5:56 pm to
quote:

Where did you get this total cost from? Is it the same if Medicare paid it? Is it the same if a different insurer paid it? Is it the same if you'd have cash in hand


Yes, it’s the same, thanks to government.

Not all of this is directed at you.

I’ve made it through 3 pages, haven’t seen someone medical explain insurance and costs yet, so here goes.

It is illegal for an entity to bill differently to private insurance vs government. Has to be the same, otherwise fraud.

Who controls cost: government. Medicare sets what they will pay for each procedure/visit/etc. All private insurers and Medicaid base their payment on a percentage of what Medicare sets.

Hospitals and doctors could charge you $1,000,000 for anything, but what they get paid by insurers is what the contract says. For instance, I take out your appendix, i charge $4000? Insurance says nah, we’ll pay $1000 based on my contract with them. The patient is on the hook for whatever percentage of that $1000, not the $4000. Billed Vs allowed.

So, providers base their charges on a percentage above Medicaid.

Why no one can tell you how much anything costs? There are 6+ major insurers plus many small ones. Within each of those are 6+ options to chose from, and within each of those are levels. The contract for each is different. So there may be 100 different variations, and the only one that knows the true cost is the insurance company. And the people that do the pre-certifications are not connected to billing, so are clueless to what it costs.

Why is it cheaper to get a cash price? It isn’t. Going back to billed Vs allowed, for the appendix, I’ll charge you $4000 (because I can’t charge anyone differently) but tell you I’ll drop the bill to $1000 because that’s the average that I get from insurance. If you can’t pay in full but want to, I’ll set up a payment plan.
Posted by holmesbr
Baton Rouge, La.
Member since Feb 2012
3004 posts
Posted on 6/22/22 at 6:07 pm to
Call another hospital and see what they say the price is. Just like buying a car. It's all negotiable. Call them while at the finance persons desk. Especially if it's an elective type procedure.
Posted by Spankum
Miss-sippi
Member since Jan 2007
56010 posts
Posted on 6/22/22 at 6:28 pm to
quote:

Let’s see what happens to your premium after that hospital stay or surgery.


A few years ago, I had a stroke and spent a week in intensive care…my insurance premiums didn’t go up one cent.
Posted by Bawwitdabaw
Member since Dec 2020
546 posts
Posted on 6/22/22 at 6:36 pm to
quote:

We’ve been conditioned to the think “insurance” is a deal compared to actual medical costs. Go to a cash only system and see how quickly healthcare costs drop. Our healthcare system serves to make medical providers AND insurance companies money


This. All of this.

Americans have been duped into thinking paying exorbitant amounts in insurance is somehow the only way.
Why not just have the hospitals post cash prices instead of just throwing a comically large number out there to the insurance company, who then throws it back and forth between them.
The way it’s being done in the USA is beyond retarded.
Posted by lostinbr
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Oct 2017
9341 posts
Posted on 6/22/22 at 6:36 pm to
quote:

I believe the percentage of folks who would save money over their lifetimes by paying cash as needed for care in lieu of health insurance outweigh folks who benefit.

Well, yeah.. but that’s the case for literally any type of insurance. The majority are going to pay in more than they receive in payouts. Otherwise, the insurance company wouldn’t be in business very long.

That’s the entire point of risk pooling - everyone pays a premium, and the people without claims effectively subsidize the people with claims. If everyone without medical issues drops their health insurance, it breaks the system. Some of those folks will inevitably have unexpected hospitalizations with huge bills that they can’t afford. Many of the folks left in the “unhealthy” pool will no longer be able to afford insurance, and will also rack up medical bills they can’t afford.

As long as it’s possible to receive $100k+ in medical bills due to unforeseen circumstances, we kind of need a functioning health insurance market. That’s part of the price we pay as a society in order to have widespread access to things like medevac, open heart surgery, organ transplants, etc. when needed. We either pool the risk or we cut off access to those services for everyone who can’t afford a $100k+ surprise.

All of that being said, it’s definitely a double-edged sword and I agree that the current business model leads to increased costs. I don’t think that’s due to insurance companies not caring what providers charge as you suggested - even if they do pass those costs on in the form of premiums, lower negotiated costs make the insurers more competitive and allow them to win more business. The real issue (IMHO) is that the risk pooling removes the “is this worth it?” question for the consumer/patient.

To me, the solution is higher deductibles/lower premiums and a shift back to coverage intended for more catastrophic events. Consumers/patients need to have skin in the game for sure. But there are a lot of other complicating factors (employer-provided benefits, preventative care, Medicaid/Medicare, etc.). It’s not an easy problem to solve.
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram