re: What is a conspiracy theory you actually believe?

quote:

---

Also, it's been show that plain oil-based non chemical soap is more effective than microcidal alcohol hand sanitizer. How is that possible?

---

Because with the soap you're wetting hands, washing with soap, then rinsing again, but with hand sanitizer you're just rubbing sanitizer on your hands you're not actually washing them.

This is also why Pascal’s wager is bullshite, even if one knew for a fact there was a God, the chances of having the correct one is incredibly small.

quote:

---

I want to be very clear. Wash your hands after wiping your arse. Don't eat shite

---

So you do believe in germ theory

I used to believe about half of them before everyone one went nuts. Most of them at least have a grain of truth in them until about 5 years ago.

Which ones do you specifically have doubts on?

That is not a conspiracy this well known fact

quote:

---

That's interesting and good for him. Sounds like quite the accomplished person. I suppose there are a lot of things that are classified which some might not have been at or felt at liberty to share based off the nature of the knowledge. Also, I am sure the government at the top levels has the means to keep certain things hush hush should national security hinge on the information never seeing the light of day. My point is, who knows for sure, save a few select folks, where the truth lies. That isn't meant as a swipe at your grandfather nor anyone else who might have a relative in a similar position.

quote:
Well there are a host of things...had you been goaded by the government properly, you would be hesitant to speak out against something of this magnitude, not to mention I am sure they had their futures set to the hilt by going along with the story in many realms. Not saying they DID lie but there were plenty of plausible reasons to do just that. Again, I am not saying the Moon missions were faked, but some things do seem a bit off circa 2022 looking back.

---

Hey smartass, none of the stuff you highlighted is contradictory. The first item you pointed out said that I was sure the government had methods to keep shite quiet. The second says who knows for sure where the truth lies as it relates to governmental secrets. The third says I was sure the 3 Astronauts had a lot of opportunities based off their mission...not my fault your reading comprehension sucks but you're the one who chose to advertise it.

quote:

---

shite is filled with toxins and parasites

---

And germs. Cholera is caused by a germ, but whatevs.

What about flesh eating bacteria, what the frick is going on there?

quote:

---

Liberator

---

I don't think I understood one thing you said

quote:

---

Also, it's been show that plain oil-based non chemical soap is more effective than microcidal alcohol hand sanitizer. How is that possible?

We're selling chemicals to put on everyone's skin and all you need is any oil, non polar with water to scrape the visible filth off. That's shown to be better than chemicals that kill bacteria. That's another problem for germ theory.

---

Every field of science has discordant published results, and only sometimes is it due to a problem with the underlying theory (sometimes it's research design, execution, statistical analysis, problems with interpretation, etc.) We simply couldn't accept any scientific theories at all if all research needed to be concordant with a theory.

What I tend to see when I see professionals deepen their knowledge is try to understand discordant research, not weight it too heavily when it disagrees with expert consensus, and only venture to reject strong expert consensus (and germ theory has massive expert consensus) with proportionally strong evidence.

Exactly, why did they seem like they were dodging questions in the post Apollo interview? And all claimed to have seen no stars but then changed their story.