Started By
Message

re: What If A Nuke Goes Off In Los Angeles

Posted on 1/27/16 at 8:57 pm to
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299716 posts
Posted on 1/27/16 at 8:57 pm to
quote:

I think our generation was conditioned in childhood to know that we would have it worse than previous generations. It was a unique era that we grew up in and I feel like most people our age are more realistic and resilient because


I didn't expect to see 18 years of age. Cold War, duck and cover.,,

Posted by Spock's Eyebrow
Member since May 2012
12300 posts
Posted on 1/27/16 at 8:59 pm to
quote:

I ran the program using the "Castle Bravo" bomb, said to be the largest bomb in the US inventory.


Castle Bravo was the codename for the test of the first dry fuel H bomb, and at 15 MT, it had more than double the expected yield due to a reaction they failed to consider. I believe the most powerful production bomb was "only" 9 MT. Naughty Bravo dumped fallout on some Japanese fishermen, and needless to say, the Japs were not amused.
Posted by Lake Vegas Tiger
Lake Vegas
Member since Jun 2014
3299 posts
Posted on 1/27/16 at 9:03 pm to
Interesting
Posted by llfshoals
Member since Nov 2010
21035 posts
Posted on 1/27/16 at 9:08 pm to
I got Knoxville, TN in the middle of the barners/Vols game.

Good times.
Posted by Havoc
Member since Nov 2015
39568 posts
Posted on 1/27/16 at 9:32 pm to
So if I'm sitting outside in Covington and Tsar Bomba detonates in downtown New Orleans, I'll get third degree burns, etc.?
Posted by Sentrius
Fort Rozz
Member since Jun 2011
64757 posts
Posted on 1/27/16 at 9:49 pm to
quote:

So if I'm sitting outside in Covington and Tsar Bomba detonates in downtown New Orleans, I'll get third degree burns, etc.?



Yep.

It goes as far as Folsom and Grand Isle.

The Tsar is literally the ugly and most dangerous side of human ingenuity. Thank god it was too impractical for it to be ever used in war conflict.

There were bombs almost as powerful as that in the Cuban Missile Crisis. I can't imagine what that would've looked like if JFK had fricked it up.
Posted by paladine36
Member since Feb 2013
1524 posts
Posted on 1/27/16 at 9:50 pm to
Thank You!
This is fun as hell..
Posted by pensacola
pensacola
Member since Sep 2005
4832 posts
Posted on 1/27/16 at 9:53 pm to
Got to 14M with tsar bomba over Tokyo. Is that the record?
Posted by dawgfan24348
Member since Oct 2011
51733 posts
Posted on 1/27/16 at 9:59 pm to
quote:

Got to 14M with tsar bomba over Tokyo. Is that the record?
I got 18 million and pretty sure I created Godzilla
Posted by Ingeniero
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2013
23617 posts
Posted on 1/27/16 at 10:10 pm to
Went to wikipedia to read up on Tsar Bomba. I found some terrifying stuff

quote:

The bomb was attached to an 800 kilogram parachute, which gave the release and observer planes time to fly about 45 kilometres (28 mi) away from ground zero. When detonation occurred, the Tu-95V fell one kilometre from its previous altitude because of the shock wave of the bomb.


quote:

Although simplistic fireball calculations predicted the fireball would hit the ground, the bomb's own shock wave reflected back and prevented this. The fireball reached nearly as high as the altitude of the release plane and was visible at almost 1,000 kilometres (620 mi) away from where it ascended. The mushroom cloud was about 64 kilometres (40 mi) high (over seven times the height of Mount Everest), which meant that the cloud was above the stratosphere and well inside the mesosphere when it peaked.


quote:

One participant in the test saw a bright flash through dark goggles and felt the effects of a thermal pulse even at a distance of 270 kilometres (170 mi). The heat from the explosion could have caused third-degree burns 100 km (62 mi) away from ground zero.


quote:

Atmospheric focusing caused blast damage at even greater distances, breaking windows in Norway and Finland.


Posted by SuperSoakher
Member since Jun 2012
4585 posts
Posted on 1/27/16 at 10:16 pm to
The rams would instantly regret there decision
Posted by AUbagman
LA
Member since Jun 2014
11182 posts
Posted on 1/27/16 at 10:19 pm to
quote:

What If A Nuke Goes Off In Los Angeles


Some innocent, good people would be lost, but on the whole, the World profits and is better off.
Posted by jimbeam
University of LSU
Member since Oct 2011
75703 posts
Posted on 1/27/16 at 10:36 pm to
Jack Bauer will stop them don't worry
Posted by BayouBengals03
lsu14always
Member since Nov 2007
99999 posts
Posted on 1/27/16 at 10:54 pm to
I dropped the Hiroshima bomb in the middle of Wyoming and killed no one FWIW
Posted by The Boat
Member since Oct 2008
178349 posts
Posted on 1/27/16 at 11:25 pm to
You're like the pilot at the end of Outbreak
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299716 posts
Posted on 1/27/16 at 11:29 pm to
I'm wondering how a nuke not far from the ground would be affected by steep topography.
Posted by Mizzoufan26
Vacaville CA
Member since Sep 2012
18965 posts
Posted on 1/27/16 at 11:31 pm to
Then the Rams would certainly regret having moved
Posted by soccerfüt
Location: A Series of Tubes
Member since May 2013
76175 posts
Posted on 1/27/16 at 11:43 pm to
quote:

I'm wondering how a nuke not far from the ground would be affected by steep topography.
This happened at Nagasaki with Fat Man, the city is located in a valley that goes down to the water and they missed the target by over a mile because of cloud cover over the aiming point. The bomb damage assessment folks think where (relative ground elevation and lat/long) it detonated minimized it's potential damage manyfold. It still killed 35-40k immediately and more than double that eventually over time.
This post was edited on 1/28/16 at 12:01 am
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 1/27/16 at 11:46 pm to
So if it kills a bunch of those racists in Hollywood that would be good, right?
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
106096 posts
Posted on 1/27/16 at 11:49 pm to
quote:

Fat Man was an atomic bomb. Atomic bombs are significantly less powerful than the modern hydrogen bombs.


Bombs in the fifties and sixties had to be powerful because targeting was imprecise. Better accuracy means that paradoxically, modern bombs can be smaller. The standard US W88 warhead has a yield of about 500 kilotons. Much bigger than the Hiroshima bomb, but nowhere near as big as the megabombs of the early Cold War.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram