- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: What Body Count renders a woman unworthy of marriage ?
Posted on 8/24/25 at 6:12 pm to Bestbank Tiger
Posted on 8/24/25 at 6:12 pm to Bestbank Tiger
Idiot.
Men brag about their count, but women have to keep it at 1 or 2.
Such insecurity for you guys. Maybe ya'll just can't perform.
Posted on 8/24/25 at 6:22 pm to GreenRockTiger
quote:
Wow, work on that grammar before you start judging other people’s shortcomings.
Maybe he should steel himself before commenting on a thief's issues.
Posted on 8/24/25 at 6:47 pm to deltadummy
Ya thinking he got some news he shouldn't have heard?
Posted on 8/24/25 at 8:11 pm to TTB
quote:
If your woman has never had sex with another man there will always be that voice in the back of her head wondering what it’s like to be with someone else.
Would you rather the voice in her head or the head of someone else’s member having been in her mouth?
Posted on 8/27/25 at 7:00 am to DeltaTigerDelta
quote:
get the std from the high body count ho.
Do you think all women with a high body count has an STDs? I’m not saying get with anyone. There are such things as tests.
Posted on 8/27/25 at 7:02 am to LSUtiger89
They probably all have HPV, yeah.
Posted on 8/27/25 at 7:04 am to Ghost of Ed
I only care about two things.
1. That her "body count" stays at one after we get together.
2. That her "body count" does not include people I have to speak to on the regular. That is just awkward.
1. That her "body count" stays at one after we get together.
2. That her "body count" does not include people I have to speak to on the regular. That is just awkward.
Posted on 8/27/25 at 7:45 am to deltadummy
quote:
Men brag about their count
Women dont want to hear that crap, and real men dont brag about that stuff.
Not sleeping with randos is the best way to avoid issues.
Older me is different than younger me.
If I was in a physical relationship with them, I was marrying them, so I had a goid idea of thier past, as they did of mine.
Posted on 8/27/25 at 11:22 am to N2cars
quote:
Women dont want to hear that crap, and real men dont brag about that stuff.
Not sleeping with randos is the best way to avoid issues.
Older me is different than younger me.
If I was in a physical relationship with them, I was marrying them, so I had a goid idea of thier past, as they did of mine.
Men aren't bragging about it to women. They brag about it to each other. It's a sign of alpha maleness to them. Women are sluts/men are lions according to ya'll.
And sleeping with 'randos' isn't necessarily a horrible thing if it's two consenting adults. You guys just don't like it when a woman enjoys sex as much as we do, i.e. younger you didn't care one bit, did you?
Posted on 8/27/25 at 11:47 am to Ghost of Ed
You’ve caught a lot of shite in this thread, and I’m not sure it’s completely fair. Sure, you’re probably coming at it from a naive perspective, but I don’t think it’s really a bad thing.
Women who have a lot of sexual partners are, whether rightly or wrongly, considered less desirable as long term partners to men. Now, the number you would consider high and mine might differ, but that’s almost a fact of life. Women, until the pill came along, since the beginning have mated across and up hierarchies for a reason. And women who didn’t run around and be the town bike were generally considered more desirable and more valuable in the mating pool.
Women who have a lot of sexual partners are, whether rightly or wrongly, considered less desirable as long term partners to men. Now, the number you would consider high and mine might differ, but that’s almost a fact of life. Women, until the pill came along, since the beginning have mated across and up hierarchies for a reason. And women who didn’t run around and be the town bike were generally considered more desirable and more valuable in the mating pool.
Popular
Back to top


2








