- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 6/1/21 at 8:20 pm to kciDAtaE
quote:
What is the amount of people in each category I wonder?
Do you think they are the same?

Also, I’m not sure what that has to do with my point.
If you think there shouldn’t be a skew towards wealthy kids at top-tier universities, you must also believe one or both of the following:
1. That there is no correlation between intelligence and income.
2. That there is no correlation between parents’ intelligence and their kids’ intelligence.
This post was edited on 6/1/21 at 8:29 pm
Posted on 6/1/21 at 8:23 pm to kciDAtaE
My son will be a freshman at LSU this fall, honors college. Initially he wanted to go for a top 20 school however the cost would be way too high. Cost is a gliding scale based on need. He did however apply to and got into Rice and Georgia Tech but the cost would have been over 100k.
He did receive full cost of attendance from LSU so it was a no brainer. As someone else mentioned, come out of undergrad with no debt then off to grad or med school
I believe the average ACT for honors college is a 32 so there’s plenty of smart kids
He did receive full cost of attendance from LSU so it was a no brainer. As someone else mentioned, come out of undergrad with no debt then off to grad or med school
I believe the average ACT for honors college is a 32 so there’s plenty of smart kids
Posted on 6/1/21 at 8:37 pm to lostinbr
quote:
Also, I’m not sure what that has to do with my point.
Admissions to Ivy League is based on wealth more than intelligence. Prestige and legacy.
Posted on 6/1/21 at 8:39 pm to Yoda Baby
quote:I know a Harvard grad... his first choice was Stanford, but they didn't accept him. He was accepted to Harvard, Duke, Notre Dame, and Vanderbilt (applications), Harvard was his second choice.
My girlfriend has a masters from Stanford. Not Ivy League but nothing to sneeze at
I wouldn't have thought Stanford is harder to get into, but apparently it is (or was in that case).
Posted on 6/1/21 at 9:32 pm to kciDAtaE
quote:
Admissions to Ivy League is based on wealth more than intelligence. Prestige and legacy.
First you copied and pasted an excerpt saying that the kids from the top 1% incomes are 77x more likely to be accepted by an Ivy League school than kids from the bottom 20%.
Then you asked how many people are in each category. Which is an asinine question to begin with because one is, by definition, 20% of the population and the other is 1% of the population. But I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you know what “quintile” means. In which case - perhaps you were pointing out that the top 1% is (obviously) a smaller subset of the population.
Here’s the thing though - that’s also asinine because the phrase “77x more likely” already takes the differences in population size into account.

So, whatever.. let’s get to the meat of your assertion. I found the executive summary you copied and pasted that “77x more likely” line from. You know what else it says?
quote:
Second, children from low- and high-income families have similar earnings outcomes conditional on the college they attend, indicating that low-income students are not mismatched at selective colleges.
The authors say this in an effort to point out that these schools are not over-accepting low-income students. But the inverse is also true - if they were under-accepting low-income students, then you would expect the small number of low-income students to out-perform their wealthy peers (because their wealthy peers only got in because of money, not ability).
In fact, the actual report that you cited states the following:
quote:
The small gap in earnings outcomes between students from high- vs. low-income families within each college shows that most colleges successfully “level the playing field” across students with different socioeconomic backgrounds, either because they select children of relatively uniform ability or because they provide greater value-added for children from low-income families (Dale and Krueger 2002).
Posted on 6/1/21 at 9:51 pm to Bjorn Cyborg
For the Engineering college besides computer engineering I’m sure you could make a strong argument. However most ivy students are going to run Wall Street and now tech
Posted on 6/1/21 at 10:01 pm to Bjorn Cyborg
That degree from Brown didn’t help Booby Jindal anymore than if he would’ve gone to LSU.
They are just diploma factories like most schools.
LSU has top notch students/alumni, so do Ivy League schools
They are just diploma factories like most schools.
LSU has top notch students/alumni, so do Ivy League schools
Popular
Back to top
