Started By
Message

re: Well, the usual lying begins. Webb telescope.

Posted on 7/21/22 at 12:15 pm to
Posted by BhamBlazeDog
Birmingham
Member since Aug 2018
3831 posts
Posted on 7/21/22 at 12:15 pm to
You're really going to upset the space nerds in here with this one.
Posted by LegendInMyMind
Member since Apr 2019
74985 posts
Posted on 7/21/22 at 12:20 pm to
quote:

You're really going to upset the space nerds in here with this one.

When you willfully refuse to understand even the most basic aspects of what you're shitting on, you earn every bit of ridicule you get.
Posted by Liberator
Revelation 20:10-12
Member since Jul 2020
9071 posts
Posted on 7/21/22 at 12:23 pm to
quote:

You're really going to upset the space nerds in here with this one.

When you willfully refuse to understand even the most basic aspects of what you're shitting on, you earn every bit of ridicule you get.


Ruh-roe...Here comes muh-"Ridicule"!

What is being "shite" on again?
Posted by Gaggle
Member since Oct 2021
7286 posts
Posted on 7/21/22 at 12:25 pm to
quote:

quote:

You people are insane.


Let me cede that portion of the argument to you. Now, if possible, please explain
A true legend
Posted by Shwapp
Gonzales, LA
Member since Sep 2016
1033 posts
Posted on 7/21/22 at 12:26 pm to
Man, I knew some people on this site were dumb, but this post seems to have hailed the short bus.
Posted by Liberator
Revelation 20:10-12
Member since Jul 2020
9071 posts
Posted on 7/21/22 at 12:26 pm to
quote:

Does anyone actually believe they sent 10 billion dollars and 2 decades worth of work and strapped it on a payload skeeted it out into the deep dark void only to be taken out by snot Rocket from space a few months into it's operation.


A "asteroid pebble" allegedly hit the Webb.

But yes -- these NASA fanbois believe everything they're told. Afterall, it's no less official "Canon" than Star Wars/Star Trek "history" and "science".

When the Hubble was first released, IT also experienced a malfnction.
Posted by LegendInMyMind
Member since Apr 2019
74985 posts
Posted on 7/21/22 at 12:26 pm to
quote:

Ruh-roe...Here comes muh-"Ridicule"!

What is being "shite" on again?

Easy, partner, the Earth is still flat. Don't shoot a comrade.
Posted by Geekboy
Member since Jan 2004
8039 posts
Posted on 7/21/22 at 12:27 pm to
quote:

understand even the most basic aspects

If so basic explain 500 million to 10 billion. Simple. Basic. Happens all the time.

Go ahead. Explain this one. Should be easy to explain. Oh, wait….inflation? Cost of oil went up? No, wait … those working on it got a pay raise. Bonuses!!! That’s why it cost 20 times more!!! None of the above? Damn! What could it be?

If so easy and basic you should be able to help us out here to understand that type of easily explained cost overrun. I’ll hang up and listen. I bet you come back with a smart arse response but no rational explanation.
Posted by Liberator
Revelation 20:10-12
Member since Jul 2020
9071 posts
Posted on 7/21/22 at 12:30 pm to




And down goes the Webb Telescope!



Posted by Liberator
Revelation 20:10-12
Member since Jul 2020
9071 posts
Posted on 7/21/22 at 12:33 pm to
quote:

If so basic explain 500 million to 10 billion. Simple. Basic. Happens all the time.

Go ahead. Explain this one. Should be easy to explain. Oh, wait…


They will say: "Sh*t happens."

Like one stray "pebble" in the alleged "Lower Earf Orbit" destroying this 10 billion dollar boondoggle.

What are the odds??



Posted by Volvagia
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2006
53385 posts
Posted on 7/21/22 at 12:34 pm to
quote:

Does anyone actually believe they sent 10 billion dollars and 2 decades worth of work and strapped it on a payload skeeted it out into the deep dark void only to be taken out by snot Rocket from space a few months into it's operation.



The only ones who claim that it was taken out by anything are the conspiracy theorists in need of a new fix.

It degraded performance, but it’s still within mission tolerances.
Posted by SquatchDawg
Cohutta Wilderness
Member since Sep 2012
20019 posts
Posted on 7/21/22 at 12:36 pm to
Aliens did it.

Nobody likes a peeping Tom.
Posted by mattz1122
Member since Oct 2007
56248 posts
Posted on 7/21/22 at 12:37 pm to
It's sad that these tards on this board can vote.
Posted by Diseasefreeforall
Member since Oct 2012
7368 posts
Posted on 7/21/22 at 12:42 pm to
quote:

If so basic explain 500 million to 10 billion. Simple. Basic. Happens all the time.

Go ahead. Explain this one. Should be easy to explain. Oh, wait….inflation? Cost of oil went up? No, wait … those working on it got a pay raise. Bonuses!!! That’s why it cost 20 times more!!! None of the above? Damn! What could it be?

If so easy and basic you should be able to help us out here to understand that type of easily explained cost overrun. I’ll hang up and listen. I bet you come back with a smart arse response but no rational explanation.

The $500 million was for a concept telescope in 1996

The real overrun is about 2x, from $4.5 billion in 2005. I'm not defending the budget blowout but Hubble was even worse.

Hubble could be repaired though but James Webb is too far away if something really goes wrong.
Posted by Gaggle
Member since Oct 2021
7286 posts
Posted on 7/21/22 at 12:45 pm to
There's no pebbles in low moon orbit, just earf. Or they got lucky. Or maybe the lunar lander employed the latest in 1960s tinfoil scotch tape anti-pebble technology. Idk

Posted by Liberator
Revelation 20:10-12
Member since Jul 2020
9071 posts
Posted on 7/21/22 at 12:46 pm to
Jupiter...

Ever see THIS "image" said to be of Jupiter from The Hubble?

This one even has glowing "Auroras" at the supposed icecaps according to NASA.

People want so desperately to "see new stuff" in "deep space" that "justify the cost" of NASA's alleged Hubbel/Webb images and projects.



This post was edited on 7/21/22 at 1:30 pm
Posted by roadkill
East Coast, FL
Member since Oct 2008
2122 posts
Posted on 7/21/22 at 12:46 pm to
quote:

Lower Earf Orbit"


Hubble is in low earth orbit - JWST is at Lagrange point - try to keep up.
Posted by Liberator
Revelation 20:10-12
Member since Jul 2020
9071 posts
Posted on 7/21/22 at 12:55 pm to
quote:

There's no pebbles in low moon orbit, just earf.


Well, WE know that. But official NASA / Astronomy canon can't ever allow any reasonable doubt and common sense questions to ever seep into the subconscious of TrueBelievers.



quote:

Or maybe the lunar lander employed the latest in 1960s tinfoil scotch tape anti-pebble technology. Idk




(You forgot the special anti-pebble construction paper and curtain rods tech too)
Posted by HubbaBubba
North of DFW, TX
Member since Oct 2010
51705 posts
Posted on 7/21/22 at 1:01 pm to
quote:

68gb device
That device probably is unlike anything used on Earth since it has to operate in the vacuum of space and at a temperature of -448.15 degrees Fahrenheit.

I won't speculate on the cost of that drive, but the cost to test and certify it for the cold of space in those conditions probably cost in the neighborhood $5 Million or more.
Posted by Liberator
Revelation 20:10-12
Member since Jul 2020
9071 posts
Posted on 7/21/22 at 1:03 pm to
quote:

Hubble is in low earth orbit - JWST is at Lagrange point - try to keep up.


I'm trying...

What other NASA "space craft" are also said to be out there in Space" (whether "Low Earf Orbit" or making stops at other planets?)

What is the official ISS count?

How many "landers" and "helicopters" are on Mars?

And aren't there several NASA spacecraft touring and scouring the planets AND their respective moons? Not to mention the supposed older spacecraft that are said to have left the Solar System, only to recently have "lost transmission power"?
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram