- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Weather Manipulation Dates Back 100+ Years: And the Modern Day Attack On New Orleans
Posted on 7/12/19 at 7:40 pm to ezride25
Posted on 7/12/19 at 7:40 pm to ezride25
quote:
Is that what what those chemtrails are for? Weather manipulation? And is this effective against ufos?
Geo-engineering/chemtrails is openly admitted - so anyone thinking it's full-on conspiracy is uninformed.
The purpose? I'd be arrogant to say for certain.
There's a chance the intentions are 'good', although perhaps misguided. There is a possibility they're trying to reflect sunlight away from earth to keep temps down. It's tough to say as I would have no way of knowing AND it's not a topic I spend time on.
1
Posted on 7/12/19 at 7:41 pm to northshorebamaman
quote:
You linked a podcast of a guy discussing him. I posted the official record.
That "official" site has a place for you to donate your car to them
Posted on 7/12/19 at 7:42 pm to TidenUP
I've got adblock so I didn't see it.Posted on 7/12/19 at 7:50 pm to Hidden Tiger
quote:Did you even listen to the podcast from your 'official source'? He concluded by saying it wasn't likely that he had built a weather machine.
Oh shite - laugh out loud.
Look up, brother man.
Posted on 7/12/19 at 7:50 pm to northshorebamaman
Question:
Seems like people are questioning whether or not it rained 30 inches in January 1916.
Is the official history of the 1916 flood a lie?
Seems like people are questioning whether or not it rained 30 inches in January 1916.
Is the official history of the 1916 flood a lie?
Posted on 7/12/19 at 7:53 pm to northshorebamaman
I think most people avoid things that would cause a restructuring of their belief system.
If you want to think it was a coincidence that San Diego hired a man to make it rain in December 1915, and in January 1916 it rained the most in recorded history, resulting in a flood.
Then cool.
That's a heck of a coincidence.
If you want to think it was a coincidence that San Diego hired a man to make it rain in December 1915, and in January 1916 it rained the most in recorded history, resulting in a flood.
Then cool.
That's a heck of a coincidence.
Posted on 7/12/19 at 7:54 pm to Hidden Tiger
quote:I've already posted this link. The official record says 7.56 inches in Jan. 1916.
Seems like people are questioning whether or not it rained 30 inches in January 1916.
Is the official history of the 1916 flood a lie?
LINK
Posted on 7/12/19 at 7:56 pm to northshorebamaman
This has been a welcomed relief from the Barry thread. Haha
I was hoping YogaGirl would show back up after I finally signed up.
I was hoping YogaGirl would show back up after I finally signed up.
Posted on 7/12/19 at 7:57 pm to Hidden Tiger
Do you have another link that corroborates the info from site you posted? NBM posted a link that states much less than 30 inches for the entire year of 1916.
This post was edited on 7/12/19 at 7:59 pm
Posted on 7/12/19 at 7:57 pm to Hidden Tiger
quote:You posted him as your 'official' proof.
I think most people avoid things that would cause a restructuring of their belief system.
Posted on 7/12/19 at 8:01 pm to FAP SAM
quote:
Do you have another link that corroborates the info from site you posted? NBM posted a link that states much less than 30 inches for the entire year of 1916.
Do you think the abundance of available stories in the flood in 1916 is fake?
Posted on 7/12/19 at 8:02 pm to Hidden Tiger
quote:Can you link anything more credible than a story?
Do you think the abundance of available stories in the flood in 1916 is fake?
Posted on 7/12/19 at 8:04 pm to Hidden Tiger
It doesn't take 30in of rain to flood. So I'll ask again. Do you have any corroborating outside source? Or should we just believe everything we read on the internet?
Posted on 7/12/19 at 8:04 pm to northshorebamaman
quote:
You posted him as your 'official' proof.
Really? You think that link is the proof for this entire idea?
Having trouble following along?
Someone (you?) questioned the rain fall amount in January 1916.
When I searched rainfall San Diego 1916 this image popped on google and that's the link I shared. I assumed in that link would say 30 inches of rain fell.
Posted on 7/12/19 at 8:06 pm to Hidden Tiger
You say you are only providing information, but your commentary is pretty biased.
My question: are you in a safe place? Have you prepared for a massive flood in your area? If you are a believer, you must have taken the necessary precautions, yes?
My question: are you in a safe place? Have you prepared for a massive flood in your area? If you are a believer, you must have taken the necessary precautions, yes?
Posted on 7/12/19 at 8:09 pm to Hidden Tiger
quote:That's why you should probably read your link before posting it as proof. It simply listed the claims and the podcast declared it as unlikely.
Really? You think that link is the proof for this entire idea?
Having trouble following along?
Someone (you?) questioned the rain fall amount in January 1916.
When I searched rainfall San Diego 1916 this image popped on google and that's the link I shared. I assumed in that link would say 30 inches of rain fell.
Do you even understand what an official source is?
Posted on 7/12/19 at 8:09 pm to FAP SAM
quote:
It doesn't take 30in of rain to flood. So I'll ask again. Do you have any corroborating outside source? Or should we just believe everything we read on the internet?
Weather.gov
Yep.
Looks like the person who asserted it only rained 7+ inches in San Diego, Jan 1916 was not being entirely honest.
Scroll down to January 1916 in the link and you will see.
The tower built by Hatfield was 20 miles outside of San Diego and the reservoir where it rained (on some accounts almost 60 inches) flowed to San Diego.
Thanks for stopping by.
Posted on 7/12/19 at 8:10 pm to northshorebamaman
Looks like I do - see above.
Posted on 7/12/19 at 8:12 pm to Hidden Tiger
quote:Who isn't being honest. You're the idiot that said it was in San Diego.
The tower built by Hatfield was 20 miles outside of San Diego and the reservoir where it rained (on some accounts almost 60 inches) flowed to San Diego.
Posted on 7/12/19 at 8:16 pm to northshorebamaman
quote:
Who isn't being honest. You're the idiot that said it was in San Diego
The OP says the tower was built 20 miles outside San Diego.
In terms of official records, it appears San Diego proper doesn't count the rain that occurred closer to the tower, although it did rain 5 inches in 12 hours in the city itself.
The unusual record breaking rainfall happened just outside San Diego proper and is what caused the devastating flooding in San Diego.
Pretty reasonable explanation.
This post was edited on 7/12/19 at 8:17 pm
Page 4 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News