- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Wake Forest professor: Jury Selection is racist, we have proof
Posted on 12/4/18 at 6:43 pm
Posted on 12/4/18 at 6:43 pm

quote:
Race, as a matter of constitutional principle, cannot factor into the selection of jurors for criminal trials. But in the American justice system, anyone with a bit of common sense and a view from the back of the courtroom knows the colorblind ideal isn’t true in practice.
Racial bias largely seeps in through what’s called “peremptory” challenges: the ability of a prosecutor — and then a defense attorney — to block a certain number of potential jurors without needing to give the court any reason for the exclusion.
quote:
Folk wisdom, among those familiar with the song and dance, is that prosecutors use these challenges to remove nonwhite jurors, who are statistically more likely to acquit, while defense attorneys — who can step in only after the pool has been narrowed by prosecutors — typically counteract by removing more white jurors
quote:
When the dust settles at the close of jury selection, defense attorneys’ actions in the last leg of the process do not cancel out the combined skewed actions from prosecutors and judges. The consistent result is African-Americans occupying a much smaller percentage of seats in the jury box than they did in the original jury pool.
LINK
This post was edited on 12/4/18 at 6:44 pm
Posted on 12/4/18 at 6:45 pm to Tigerbait357
Jury selection is retarded in the first place.
Should be 12 random people and that's it.
Should be 12 random people and that's it.
Posted on 12/4/18 at 6:47 pm to PrivatePublic
Each side should get as many "for cause" challenges as is necessary to seat a jury and alternates. Peremptory challenges should be scrapped altogether.
Posted on 12/4/18 at 6:49 pm to Tigerbait357
I am not reading that, but is this person speaking as if he wants to be selected to jury duty?
I wouldn't say jury selection is racist, it all depends on the case and the attorneys as to why type of jury they are trying to put together.
I wouldn't say jury selection is racist, it all depends on the case and the attorneys as to why type of jury they are trying to put together.
Posted on 12/4/18 at 6:51 pm to Tigerbait357
Much the way AA's mostly (90%) vote one way politically, it is pretty certain that they vote one way in jury trials. Or at least more likely.
Whereas whites you get more of a mixed bag.
There is age "racism", too.
Just no one is going to complain about that.
Whereas whites you get more of a mixed bag.
There is age "racism", too.
Just no one is going to complain about that.
Posted on 12/4/18 at 6:58 pm to Tigerbait357
If you are guilty why wouldn't you want cognitively deficient people listening to the evidence?
Posted on 12/4/18 at 7:01 pm to Tigerbait357
Is it racist when plaintiff attorneys strike white military members and cops?
Posted on 12/4/18 at 7:05 pm to Tigerbait357
Does he consider the affect of "smart whites" that go in, and instantly take themselves out of consideration so they can get back to work??
Posted on 12/4/18 at 7:09 pm to Tigerbait357
Juries should be made of professional jurors. People who know the law, do it for a living, etc. Jury of my peers, my arse.
This post was edited on 12/4/18 at 7:34 pm
Posted on 12/4/18 at 7:12 pm to Tigerbait357
quote:
Racial bias largely seeps in through what’s called “peremptory” challenges: the ability of a prosecutor — and then a defense attorney — to block a certain number of potential jurors without needing to give the court any reason for the exclusion.
If someone makes a Batson challenge (states that your peremptory challenges were not based on race), then you have to give the court a valid, non-racially based reason for your peremptory strike.
Posted on 12/4/18 at 7:13 pm to TOSOV
Bingo
Twice that Ive been called they practically kicked my arse out after I had my chance to speak my thoughts on the case.
And GFU as far as serving my community....in this manner
Twice that Ive been called they practically kicked my arse out after I had my chance to speak my thoughts on the case.
And GFU as far as serving my community....in this manner
Posted on 12/4/18 at 7:19 pm to CarrolltonTiger
quote:
If you are guilty why wouldn't you want cognitively deficient people listening to the evidence?
Posted on 12/4/18 at 7:23 pm to liz18lsu
quote:
Jurys should be made of professional jurors. People who know the law, do it for a living, etc. Jury of my peers, my arse.
This. Most of my “peers” are complete idiots. I don’t want them if I’m innocent
Posted on 12/4/18 at 7:25 pm to PrivatePublic
quote:
Jury selection is retarded in the first place.
Should be 12 random people and that's it.
You wouldn't say that if you've ever been involved in a trial. Do you even voir dire, bro?
Posted on 12/4/18 at 7:31 pm to liz18lsu
quote:
Jurys should be made of professional jurors. People who know the law, do it for a living, etc. Jury of my peers, my arse.
They’re called judges
Posted on 12/4/18 at 7:37 pm to Lee to Toliver
quote:
They’re called judges

A reversal of the jury's verdict isn't common, is it?
Posted on 12/4/18 at 7:39 pm to liz18lsu
quote:
Juries should be made of professional jurors
Haha so you’re dumb. That’s why you troll TD for attention
Posted on 12/4/18 at 8:07 pm to Elleshoe
quote:
Haha so you’re dumb. That’s why you troll TD for attention
I’m not dumb and my post count shows I don’t post much. You remain a moron, good job
Posted on 12/4/18 at 8:08 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
Agreed
First thing I thought of when I saw this thread was OJ.
Popular
Back to top
