Started By
Message

Vader’s Model Desk: PzKpfw V Ausf. A “Panther”

Posted on 2/24/24 at 5:28 pm
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
64485 posts
Posted on 2/24/24 at 5:28 pm
quote:

The Panther tank, officially Panzerkampfwagen V Panther (abbreviated PzKpfw V) with ordnance inventory designation: Sd.Kfz. 171, is a German medium tank of World War II. It was used on the Eastern and Western Fronts from mid-1943 to the end of the war in May 1945.

The Panther was intended to counter the Soviet T-34 medium tank and to replace the Panzer III and Panzer IV. Nevertheless, it served alongside the Panzer IV and the heavier Tiger I until the end of the war. The Panther was a compromise. While having essentially the same Maybach V12 petrol (690 hp) engine as the Tiger I, it had better gun penetration, was lighter and faster, and could traverse rough terrain better than the Tiger I. The trade-off was weaker side armour, which made it vulnerable to flanking fire and a weaker high explosive shell. The Panther proved to be effective in open country and long-range engagements.[8] Although it had excellent firepower, protection and mobility, its reliability was less impressive.[9] The Panther was far cheaper to produce than the Tiger I. Key elements of the Panther design, such as its armour, transmission, and final drive, were simplifications made to improve production rates and address raw material shortages. Despite this, the overall design has still been described by some as "overengineered".

LINK







Tamiya 1/35 scale Sd.kfz 171 PzKpfw V Ausf. A “Panther”
2nd SS Pz. Div.
Ukraine, Autumn 1943
Posted by CAD703X
Liberty Island
Member since Jul 2008
78003 posts
Posted on 2/24/24 at 5:51 pm to
Didn't you already build a Panther?

I'd love to see a shot of all your tanks together.

ETA my kid at the late great Patton tank museum at fort Knox.

They let him climb on top of it too.

This post was edited on 2/24/24 at 5:56 pm
Posted by SoFla Tideroller
South Florida
Member since Apr 2010
30072 posts
Posted on 2/24/24 at 6:28 pm to
The high muzzle pressures/velocities of the long-barrelled 75 required thicker walls on the shell; thereby reducing internal space available on its HE rounds for explosive. But, its AP rounds were quite adept at punching holes in enemy armor. Add in the superior German optics equalled bad day for Russian tank drivers at long range.
Posted by Chrome
Chromeville
Member since Nov 2007
10321 posts
Posted on 2/24/24 at 6:33 pm to
Great job on the painting. The weathering effects pretty solid.
Posted by fr33manator
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
124047 posts
Posted on 2/24/24 at 6:34 pm to
Thanks for posting. Love your work
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
64485 posts
Posted on 2/24/24 at 6:40 pm to
quote:

Didn't you already build a Panther?

Oh yeah. This is like the 5th one.
Posted by OK Roughneck
The Sooner State
Member since Aug 2021
9289 posts
Posted on 2/24/24 at 6:42 pm to
Thanks for sharing another one with us. Awesome work !!
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
64485 posts
Posted on 2/24/24 at 6:51 pm to
quote:

The high muzzle pressures/velocities of the long-barrelled 75 required thicker walls on the shell; thereby reducing internal space available on its HE rounds for explosive. But, its AP rounds were quite adept at punching holes in enemy armor. Add in the superior German optics equalled bad day for Russian tank drivers at long range.


Once they worked the bugs out it was an outstanding tank.
Posted by Scooter McWinner
Texas
Member since Feb 2024
303 posts
Posted on 2/24/24 at 6:57 pm to
quote:

Maybach V12
Posted by beerJeep
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2016
35002 posts
Posted on 2/24/24 at 7:03 pm to
Errrrrika!
Posted by SoFla Tideroller
South Florida
Member since Apr 2010
30072 posts
Posted on 2/24/24 at 7:10 pm to
Absolutely. You didn't wanna that thing hull-dowm in your short barrelled Sherman or 76mm T-34.

It just wasn't a vehicle Germany could afford in '44 and '45.
Posted by Beauw
Blanchard
Member since Sep 2007
3487 posts
Posted on 2/24/24 at 7:11 pm to
Best tank of the war, well done!
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
64485 posts
Posted on 2/24/24 at 7:35 pm to
quote:

Absolutely. You didn't wanna that thing hull-dowm in your short barrelled Sherman or 76mm T-34.

It just wasn't a vehicle Germany could afford in '44 and '45.


What’s ironic is after the war, the factory that produced the Panther fell into the British zone of occupation and there were a number of unfinished Panthers were left there. The Brits got the factory workers to complete at least one Panther so it could be taken back to Great Britain for testing. They put it through the same tests they would any prototype tank in consideration for mass production. What’s funny is it failed the trials. This post-war Panther is now on display at the tank museum in Blovington…



LINK
This post was edited on 2/24/24 at 7:37 pm
Posted by RTM4
Pflugerville
Member since Apr 2018
1495 posts
Posted on 2/24/24 at 8:17 pm to
Another bang up job!! Excellent.

The Panther was definitely more than a match for the allies but I have read it was even more unreliable than the Tiger 1 and had to be babied when moving over terrain in battle conditions or it would pop the front drive.

Still an awesome tank that you did not ever want to meet in battle.
Posted by HeadSlash
TEAM LIVE BADASS - St. GEORGE
Member since Aug 2006
49593 posts
Posted on 2/24/24 at 8:27 pm to
quote:

Thanks for posting. Love your work


This

The Panther should have had an 88
Posted by brass2mouth
NOLA
Member since Jul 2007
19685 posts
Posted on 2/24/24 at 8:27 pm to
Hard to believe they lost with all their advancements, especially tanks and aircraft.
Posted by SirWinston
PNW
Member since Jul 2014
81567 posts
Posted on 2/24/24 at 8:32 pm to
Beautiful work, love the Wehrmacht uniforms, equipment, and armoured vehicles. One of my distant great uncles served under the Desert Fox
This post was edited on 2/24/24 at 8:33 pm
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
64485 posts
Posted on 2/24/24 at 8:34 pm to
quote:

Hard to believe they lost with all their advancements, especially tanks and aircraft.


Their problem is they never could make enough of them. Yes, tank for tank the Tiger & Panther was better than their counterparts on the other side of the line. But when they outnumber you ten to one, or more, that doesn’t matter.
Posted by SirWinston
PNW
Member since Jul 2014
81567 posts
Posted on 2/24/24 at 8:42 pm to
Every great leader on the cusp of conquering Europe defeated themselves due to megalomania.
Posted by TigerHornII
Member since Feb 2021
285 posts
Posted on 2/24/24 at 8:43 pm to
quote:

quote:
Hard to believe they lost with all their advancements, especially tanks and aircraft.


Their problem is they never could make enough of them. Yes, tank for tank the Tiger & Panther was better than their counterparts on the other side of the line. But when they outnumber you ten to one, or more, that doesn’t matter.


It was more than just numbers. The Shermans were more reliable - a LOT more - even taking materials issues into account. They were also more survivable, with something like 70% of Sherman crews making it out of the tank after a penetrating hit. The German tanks were better than the abysmal T-34 in this respect, but Germany could not afford to lose crews.

The Pershing was the best medium tank of the war, it just got to the party too late to do much. It was still lighter and more reliable than the Panther.

PS - OP builds models like I dreamed of building models when I was a kid! I never got close to that skill level!
This post was edited on 2/24/24 at 8:45 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram