- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Utah has passed what I believe is a great law: fathers must pay 50% of pregnancy costs
Posted on 4/6/21 at 7:10 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
Posted on 4/6/21 at 7:10 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
Fine with it but when do we get laws where men get treated equally in cases of divorce and in child custody? Because women overwhelmingly get to frick men over in that area
Posted on 4/6/21 at 7:13 am to OMLandshark
quote:
Yet women can murder the child without impunity even if the father will raise it at his own cost 100%.
Yea I think it’s only fair to require the father to sign off on abortion as well
Posted on 4/6/21 at 7:14 am to deltaland
When all the old useless judges adhering to chivalry die off and women get the equality they demanded from the young men in the legal system who grew up watching their mothers screw over the system.
Posted on 4/6/21 at 7:15 am to WaWaWeeWa
quote:
men will be pressuring women to get abortions or beating the shite out of them to abort the fetus themselves
Somebody's been watching too much Lifetime.
Posted on 4/6/21 at 7:29 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
A) will make men way more responsible regarding their seed spilling
Bitch, please.
Posted on 4/6/21 at 7:29 am to squid_hunt
quote:
Somebody's been watching too much Lifetime.
Nah. I just think we don’t need more policy to correct for bad policy. That’s the progressives way. Stop sending checks to single mothers and they will stop fricking everything that moves. All they have to do is take a pill a day and they won’t get pregnant. It’s easier than ever. There are no excuses to have 6 kids from 6 different fathers, and no income.
A similar situation is student debt. Government intervention and guaranteed payment has resulted in everyone getting whatever student loan they want, even those paying 50k a year for an art degree. That drives prices up. Now the liberals say we need more laws and policies to fix education.... NO, just stop screwing it up and the system will auto correct.
This post was edited on 4/6/21 at 7:31 am
Posted on 4/6/21 at 7:40 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
Louisiana and all other states need this morally righteous law
Whenever the subject has came up over prices rising or just not having income, I have heard countless times from single urban mothers, "I need to have another kid. I need that government check".
Many are actively looking for un-wed seed spilling/pregnancy. Now, they get a 50% discount/incentive to continue their immorality and siphon 18 more years of tax-payer funding.
Posted on 4/6/21 at 7:40 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
Hopefully they use DNA to confirm the father and not just go on someone’s word before payout begins.
Posted on 4/6/21 at 8:37 am to WaWaWeeWa
quote:
Nah. I just think we don’t need more policy to correct for bad policy. That’s the progressives way. Stop sending checks to single mothers and they will stop fricking everything that moves. All they have to do is take a pill a day and they won’t get pregnant. It’s easier than ever. There are no excuses to have 6 kids from 6 different fathers, and no income.
Better solution Vasectomy is reversible and cheaper over the long run. It's not even considered surgery. It's easier than even getting a prescription refilled for a pill. Let's just require all men to get a vasectomy until proper paperwork is filled out to prove you are consensually having a child with a willing partner.
There is no excuse to have 6 kids from 6 different mothers and no income.
Posted on 4/6/21 at 8:40 am to LSU Delts
quote:
Hopefully they use DNA to confirm the father and not just go on someone’s word before payout begins.
Are you suggesting a woman would lie or make up who the father was? Sounds like misogyny to me.
quote:
Let's just require all men to get a vasectomy until proper paperwork is filled out to prove you are consensually having a child with a willing partner.
Yes. We're going to control who gets to breed and who doesn't. This will surely be done in a reasonable way to promote the protection of all involved and not to drive government directed genocide.
This post was edited on 4/6/21 at 8:42 am
Posted on 4/6/21 at 8:51 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
My question is what if she decides to terminate the pregnancy, and he is against it. Will they try to make him pay for 1/2 of the abortion? That sounds like a first Amendment case to me. What exactly are they calling pregnancy costs?
This post was edited on 4/6/21 at 9:49 am
Posted on 4/6/21 at 8:53 am to squid_hunt
quote:
Yes. We're going to control who gets to breed and who doesn't. This will surely be done in a reasonable way to promote the protection of all involved and not to drive government directed genocide.
Good then you agree that is just an asinine of a suggestion as the logic that it's the women's fault completely for not taking a birth control as was suggested by the poster i was replying to.
Unplanned births are going to happen no matter what we do legislating what males or females have to do to stop them is absolutely crazy concept.
If money is the issue as Utah seems to think it is make prenatal care, pregnancy charges, and child care costs free. But nah we need money to build that fighter jet we will never use that will rot in a boneyard because military something something.
Posted on 4/6/21 at 8:55 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
are women required to pay half if they have a man who isn't a POS? equality and all
Posted on 4/6/21 at 8:59 am to mindbreaker
quote:
Good then you agree that is just an asinine of a suggestion as the logic that it's the women's fault completely for not taking a birth control as was suggested by the poster i was replying to.
You're really good at making false comparisons. Did you take classes?
Government telling which men who can breed is in no way related to women taking responsibility for screwing random men and constantly popping up pregnant demanding child support.
Men are already on the hook for child support to the extreme. If women are going to demand their right to slaughter their children with no input from men, it seems unreasonable to demand men pay for the delivery if they decide to keep it.
No one is buying the virtuous single mom trope anymore. Sorry.
Posted on 4/6/21 at 9:13 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
Why involve the government in family law more than it already is?
Unintended consequences happen every single time you control freaks try to come up with some form of government intervention.
get out of people's lives.....results will improve when you do.
Unintended consequences happen every single time you control freaks try to come up with some form of government intervention.
get out of people's lives.....results will improve when you do.
Posted on 4/6/21 at 9:17 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
what a retarded law
Posted on 4/6/21 at 9:18 am to squid_hunt
quote:
Government telling which men who can breed is in no way related to women taking responsibility for screwing random men
So in your mind it's okay to tell women to take responsibility for "screwing random men" as you put it, but not telling men to take responsibility for screwing random women? I know just as many men with multiple children from different mothers as vice versa. As far as being on the hook for child support to the extreme. What is the extreme to you. Expecting you to support a child you created is extreme?
So in your scenario where men have a say in the abortion. What if the doctor tells a woman the pregnancy will kill her. Do men get to say nope I have a say she has to risk it because I want the kid. Is he on the hook when she dies from the pregnancy. Easy to stand on your soapbox and talk about the perfect solutions when you get to ignore the consequences.
400,000 kids in foster care this number has been steady for 30 years. This isn't a female or a male problem this is a people problem and putting all the burden on whichever sex you think is more responsible is absolutely the wrong avenue to take.
Posted on 4/6/21 at 9:25 am to mindbreaker
quote:
So in your mind it's okay to tell women to take responsibility for "screwing random men" as you put it, but not telling men to take responsibility for screwing random women?
Guess you missed the part about men being on the hook for child support?
quote:
I know just as many men with multiple children from different mothers as vice versa.
Your problem pretty clearly isn't that men do it. You just think women should be allowed to do it, too. Except you despise men. Stop moralizing and just admit it.
quote:
So in your scenario where men have a say in the abortion. What if the doctor tells a woman the pregnancy will kill her. Do men get to say nope I have a say she has to risk it because I want the kid.
Thanks for proving my point. You think women are allowed to do whatever they want and have all the say, because "My body, my choice" but men should foot the bill for her body.
Less than 3% of abortions are done for the health and safety of the woman. I'd bet much less. Keep whipping that strawman.
quote:
This isn't a female or a male problem this is a people problem
But mostly it's a woman problem that we pretend to fix by punishing men. It wasn't men who destigmatized bastard children, it was feminism.
Thanks for playing.
Posted on 4/6/21 at 9:29 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
A) will make men way more responsible regarding their seed spilling
You're not much of a drinker are you
Posted on 4/6/21 at 9:32 am to squid_hunt
quote:
But mostly it's a woman problem that we pretend to fix by punishing men.
LOL making men pay child support is "punishment" sorry you are a shitty father
as you said thanks for playing
Popular
Back to top


1




