- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
US puts fierce squeeze on breastfeeding policy, shocking health officials
Posted on 7/10/18 at 2:55 am
Posted on 7/10/18 at 2:55 am
quote:
The US backed down when Russia stepped in to support the pro-breastfeeding resolution
In May, a US delegation to the World Health Organization issued stunning trade and military threats in its opposition to a well-established and otherwise uncontroversial resolution encouraging breastfeeding, according to new reporting by The New York Times.
The hundreds of delegates in attendance expected an effortless approval of the resolution by the World Health Assembly, which is the decision-making body of WHO. The resolution simply put forth that mother’s milk is the healthiest option for infants and that countries should work to limit any misleading or inaccurate advertising by makers of breast-milk substitutes. It affirms a long-held position by the WHO and is backed by decades of research.
But more than a dozen participants from several countries—most requesting anonymity out of fear of US retaliation—told the Times that the American officials surprised health experts and fellow delegates alike by fiercely opposing the resolution. At first, the US delegates attempted to simply dilute the pro-breastmilk message, voiding language that called for governments to “protect, promote, and support breastfeeding” and limit promotion of competing baby food products that experts warn can be harmful. But when that failed, the US reportedly put the squeeze on countries backing the resolution by making aggressive trade and military threats—a move that further stunned the assembly.
The Ecuadorian delegation, for instance, was expected to introduce the resolution but was weaned off the idea after the US threatened to impose harmful trade measures and withdraw military assistance—which the US is providing in the northern part of the country to help address violence spilling over the border from Colombia.
Officials from the US, Uruguay, and Mexico said that at least a dozen other countries—many of which are poor countries in Africa and Latin America—dropped the resolution after the US sucked away their interest.
“What happened was tantamount to blackmail, with the US holding the world hostage and trying to overturn nearly 40 years of consensus on the best way to protect infant and young child health,” Patti Rundall, a breastfeeding advocate who attended the assembly, told the Times.
Posted on 7/10/18 at 2:59 am to MailKimp
At the end of the day, old white men don’t like women breast feeding in public, but do like their pockets being lined by lobbyists.
Posted on 7/10/18 at 3:03 am to MailKimp
Why in the hell would anyone be opposed to breastfeeding? It's a victimless act.
Posted on 7/10/18 at 3:08 am to SabinBear
From the comments section:
quote:
As one of my friends (a breastfeeding advocate) put it, clearly it was necessary to protect small formula manufacturers like Nestle from the diabolical plans of Big Titty.
quote:
If this doesn't just epitomize Trump's presidency: We threaten and blackmail developing countries to protect corporate interests at the expense of actual people, and only back down when Russia tells us to.
quote:
Thank goodness the Russians were there to lead the UN in making the correct ethical motion.
This post was edited on 7/10/18 at 3:15 am
Posted on 7/10/18 at 3:26 am to MailKimp
quote:
US puts fierce squeeze on breastfeeding policy, shocking health officials
Posted on 7/10/18 at 3:37 am to MailKimp
This has bee proven to be Fake News award of the year.
Posted on 7/10/18 at 5:29 am to MailKimp
quote:
Officials from the US, Uruguay, and Mexico said that at least a dozen other countries—many of which are poor countries in Africa and Latin America—dropped the resolution after the US sucked away their interest.
ISWYDT
Posted on 7/10/18 at 5:29 am to SabinBear
quote:
Why in the hell would anyone be opposed to breastfeeding? It's a victimless act.
It has nothing to do with breastfeeding, and everything to do with money.
Every Parent Should Know The Scandalous History Of Infant Formula
Nestle Spent $11M Lobbying Congress To Control Water, Cocoa & Trade Since 2013
Posted on 7/10/18 at 5:37 am to MailKimp
This reinforced to the world just how incredibly cucked to corporate America our leaders are. Unreal.. rather... surreal in this case.
Posted on 7/10/18 at 5:40 am to SabinBear
quote:
Why in the hell would anyone be opposed to breastfeeding? It's a victimless act.
I got an idea: we don’t need the government passing resolutions in support of breastfeeding (or opposing breastfeeding). If you want your baby to have a titty then give your baby the titty.
Everyone wants the government to stay out of their business until it’s a cause they support. I don’t need the government telling me how to feed my imaginary baby.
Posted on 7/10/18 at 5:53 am to MailKimp
quote:
US puts fierce squeeze on breast...
ISWYDT
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News