re: Update on "alien" mummies found in Peru

quote:

---

Says the close-minded bigot to the eyewitness.

---

Who's a closed minded bigot? Please rationaly dispute what I posted.

Those are fake. The Alien at Wright Patterson AFB is taller than that with a bigger (by at least 40%) head.

He has assured everyone that there are no aliens shorter then him.

He is happy and content to be there as long as the strawberry ice cream holds out, so why would he lie.

By the way, he thinks Superman is a joke. Another fact, he has seen creatures very similar to the hulk.

quote:

---

I've had several experts examine my videos who concluded they contain images of several sea serpents.

---

quote:

---

Honest question: how does one conclude that something is a species that has never been examined before? It seems like the only logical conclusions that they could reach is to identify it as a known animal or call it inconclusive.

---

By eliminating all known marine animals, birds and inanimate objects as a possible candidate for the black objects in the video based a close examination of all of the data contained in the video.

Here's how Bruce Champagne explained it in his paper:

quote:

---

Multiple species of sea birds frequent the area. It has been proposed that the images in the video are those of birds flying proximate to the surface of the water or stationed on the surface of the water (Fredericks, 2005). Birds are recorded on the video, mostly passing through the frame at a nearer proximity to the observers. Robert Clark is also heard to make recorded comments on the video incorrectly suggesting the possibility of birds as the objects being recorded, as he had previously observed birds flying in single file above the surface of the water, but not at the greater distance as that of the recorded images. William Clark, who was recording the animals and had the advantage viewing the targets through the zoom lens, immediately disagreed with the suggestion. A bird is identifiable and recorded passing through the frame left-to-right at greater distance with a normal, wide field of view at the approximate time of 01:42 on the video. A second bird is identifiable and recorded passing through the frame right-to-left at the approximate time of 02:01 on the video with a normal, wide field of view. In each instance, the birds are in the lower 1/3 of the frame and appear to be closer to the observers than the target image(s). For birds to be visible at the observed distance, would require the elimination of smaller species as possible candidates for identification, and if observed at a closer distance, to provide an image size comparable to that of the recorded birds in the foreground, would likely record recognizable characteristics, and behaviors.

The largest, and most appropriate species of bird fir consideration as possible candidates for the recorded images, include the White Pelican (Pelecanus erythrorynchos), Brown Pelican (Pelecanus occidentalis), Cormorants (Phalarocoras sp.), Black Footed Albatross (Diomedea nigripes), and gulls (Larus sp.). None of these species attain the size necessary (McConnaughey, 1988) for practical consideration, when compared to the size estimates of the recorded images (Paiva and Slusher, 2005) or have a swimming motion and/or capability consistent with the water displacement and morphology observed from the images of the videotape.

If the birds are considered as images proximate to, but not on, the surface of the water, the White Pelican's wingspan may place it within the required size range of the recorded segments/images, but the track-line upon which the images move and are observed would not display the pelican's wingspan as would be required for acceptance within the known size parameters. Additionally, for the pelicans, or any other large bird, to even approximate the required size range(s) and speed, would require the birds to fly with their wings continuously extended, suggesting flight above the air/water interface. In this condition and position, the observed water displacement is not satisfactorily explained.

At approximately 00:14 in the Clark video, two oscillating, or "looping" movements can be observed. The segments to the left of the centered images appear to cross the shore margin (Cook suggested this may be due to temperature differences between the two surface types, as known stationary objects also appear to change shape) only to abruptly change direction while continuing this revised, direction and continued motion in the precise segment order and reverse angle. At a distance, a flock of birds, especially the White Pelican (Wernert, 1982), may be able to present the image of single file formation, but would be unable, either as individuals or as a formation, to instantly reverse direction and maintain individual position within the formation, and the original observed angle of the formation."

---

In other words, for the reasons given, Champagne eliminated birds as a possible candidate for the images in the video.

quote:

---

Cetaceans are also known to enter San Francisco Bay. Most frequently observed are Grey Whales (Phocoena phocoena) and Harbor Porpoises (Lagenorhychus obliquidens). Less frequently observed are Pacific White-sided Dolphins (Lagenorhynchus phocoena) and the Dalls' Porpoise (Phoc oen oides dalli). Occasionally, Humpback Whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) have entered the bay and associated waterways.

The largest measured images in the Clark video are within the known ranges of both Grey and Humpback Whales. Whales are also known to breach the surface at a height comparable to that measured by the animals in the video. However, the animals in the Clark video maintain an extended position above the surface for approximately 2.5 sec., and continue to maintain a lower position above the surface without submerging below the air/water interface. The periscope behavior exhibited by the images on the video is likely a deliberate and controlled behavior which appears to be in excess of the known capabilities of larger cetaceans as they are unable to control their mass from falling below the air/water interface after breaching. Additionally, if the track line segments in the video are considered only visible parts of one unit for inclusion within the known size ranges of the larger cetaceans, the flexibility exhibited in the images in the Clark video do not appear to be within the range of flexure of either species of whale. If the image segments are considered independent animals, the grouping would be inconsistent with known mysticete group behavior relevant to this sequence (Walker, 1962). The "spyhopping" behavior displayed by some whale species may produce a similar appearance as that of the images in the video. However, the "spyhopping" behavior is a stationary surface display and is not consistent with the movement displayed by the images in the video. Exhalations, or "blows" could be identified at the distances involved in the video (Personal Observation), but these predictable and lingering exhalations are not observed in the video, as would be expected.

The smallest segments of the recorded images are within the known size ranges of both the Pacific White-sided Dolphin and Dall's Porpoise. However, the swimming motions and behaviors, both individually and grouped, are not consistent with the known behavior of either species. Because the behaviors and capabilities of the Clark video images are not consistent with the known abilities and/or behaviors of cetaceans species frequenting the area, it is proposed that the video images are not those of a known cetacean.

---

quote:

---

I've got the proof but I don't need to prove it to a closed-minded bigot like you.

---

You're pathetic

quote:

---

You're pathetic

---

Says the close-minded bigot to the eyewitness.

quote:

---

I'm not close minded to things are real. There are no bigfoots, aliens, fairies, or sea serpents because there is zero definitive evidence.

---

Says the close-minded bigot to the eyewitness with definitive evidence.

Fake!
Your video, while intriguing, looked nothing like real ones as shown on Sigmond’s sea Monster.

Only one way to settle this dispute between the government and the researchers.......

quote:

---

DawgfaninCa

---

I've never clicked on Any of your threads, but if this one is like all the others, then you're not helping yourself or you case(s).

It's just sad.

quote:

---

“Scientists have discredited our findings without even looking at the remains.”

---

quote:

---

scientists who say that the mummified remains were ‘altered’ to look like aliens. 

---

quote:

---

Scientists said how the bodies were ‘created’ using mummified human remains, 

---

quote:

---

Maussan responded saying: “The attitude of the government, the Ministry of Culture, is really to reject these findings, it is very disturbing… the real victim here is the truth. 

“People around the world deserve the truth about this. 

“They are trying to stop this, they are fearful this could be true and we will have to rewrite the books of history, everything we know could change and that is too fearful for many people. 

“Even without the bodies, they are saying this is not true. 

“This is physical evidence in the hands of society for the first time, and they want to take that away from us.” 

---

quote:

---

Peruvian scientists and the government saying it was a criminal hoax 

---