- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 9/7/18 at 3:02 pm to slackster
quote:
Yep, but we love LNCH.
Somehow I think you're assuming what that obvious reason is. And you still won't admit that civilians have had similar treatment is some instances.
Posted on 9/7/18 at 3:02 pm to LNCHBOX
I can’t, he lives in the burbs.
Posted on 9/7/18 at 3:02 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
Can you tell shel's retardedass
I'm not responding to you, so to keep my word, I'm going to respond to someone else with what I wanted to say to you
That time Lnch officially became an 8th grade girl.
TH03, you tell Lnch that he's no longer allowed to eat lunch at our table!!
quote:So what I said that you made fun of is literally what you just conceded is true.
I didn't say this girl didn't get some sort of treatment?
Hilarious!
This post was edited on 9/7/18 at 3:05 pm
Posted on 9/7/18 at 3:03 pm to Bayou_Tiger_225
quote:
first-degree murder
Posted on 9/7/18 at 3:03 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
Speaking of not acknowledging things, you can't acknowledge that civilians do also not get arrested right away when it seems fairly obvious they should be.
I made the statement that a civilian in this same situation would have been arrested before the police let her out of their site. I stand by that statement.
Posted on 9/7/18 at 3:04 pm to slackster
quote:
, you think Ronald Gasser and this situation are similar. That's comical
I made that comparison too. Both were idiots who thought they acted in self defense but were very very wrong. And neither was arrested that night/day.
I’ll agree with the second part though.
This post was edited on 9/7/18 at 3:05 pm
Posted on 9/7/18 at 3:04 pm to shel311
Ok fine, I'll say it. You've claimed victory while not proving anything. That is something you do over and over and over. This will be my actual last post to you. You're a phony and you just beat people over the head with your wrong post until they just get tired of playing your game. :inb4thatsallyoudo:
You're claiming I said things that I didn't, just to frame your argument.
You're claiming I said things that I didn't, just to frame your argument.
Posted on 9/7/18 at 3:05 pm to slackster
quote:
I made the statement that a civilian in this same situation would have been arrested before the police let her out of their site. I stand by that statement.
And like I said much earlier in this thread, those are not the actual words you said. Maybe if you repeat it enough, they'll change.
Posted on 9/7/18 at 3:06 pm to GetCocky11
quote:
She should go to prison, but nothing will happen to her. Lets just be real about this.
What? Did you not read what happened? Nothing will happen to her?
She took an innocent human being’s life under circumstances she created that were completely unrelated to her job. If you genuinely believe nothing will happen to her, let’s put skin in the game.
Ban bet?
Posted on 9/7/18 at 3:07 pm to LNCHBOX
Lunch says the narrative that she got preferential treatment cause she's a cop is obviously false.
Lunch says he didn't say she didn't get some sort of preferential treatment.
I say so you're saying she could possibly be getting preferential treatment because she's a copybut the narrative that she is getting preferential treatment because she's a cop is "obviously false? ...which is just an actual recap of exactly what he said.
Lunch says I'm not smart.

Lunch says he didn't say she didn't get some sort of preferential treatment.
I say so you're saying she could possibly be getting preferential treatment because she's a copybut the narrative that she is getting preferential treatment because she's a cop is "obviously false? ...which is just an actual recap of exactly what he said.
Lunch says I'm not smart.
Posted on 9/7/18 at 3:08 pm to TH03
quote:Burbs4Lyfe!!!
I can’t, he lives in the burbs.
Posted on 9/7/18 at 3:08 pm to HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
quote:
Spin? HOw fricking stupid are you man? For real? I'm not spinning shite here, I'm explaining why an investigation opens up assuming the officer is innocent and less than a fricking day later charged her with manslaughter, you're just an ignorant frick who wants police officers assumed guilty and arrested on the spot until proven innocent. Stupid motherfricker. A person tries to have a rationale discussion with you, but you're too stupid to grasp nuance. Obviously this woman made a mistake that cost a man his life and she deserved to be arrested and jailed for it, she was and she will be. The system took less than a day to get it right and you're still in here bitching, ignorant frick.

Posted on 9/7/18 at 3:09 pm to slackster
Yeah that dude went full retard fast. 
Posted on 9/7/18 at 3:09 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:I proved just now with my last post that you called me not smart for summarizing something you said, almost word for word.
Ok fine, I'll say it. You've claimed victory while not proving anything. That is something you do over and over and over. This will be my actual last post to you. You're a phony and you just beat people over the head with your wrong post until they just get tired of playing your game. :inb4thatsallyoudo:
You're claiming I said things that I didn't, just to frame your argument.
So yea, keeping on being wrong and doubling down, then saying you're not going to reply to me, then replying to me. It's what you do....every single time.
Posted on 9/7/18 at 3:11 pm to NYNolaguy1
Love how they sugarcoat the headline. What really happened:
A woman illegally entered a man's apartment and murdered him. By courtesy of your tax dollars she will now be given a paid vacation until further notice. She will not be found guilty because she works in law enforcement and because both she and the judge get their paychecks from the same place.
A woman illegally entered a man's apartment and murdered him. By courtesy of your tax dollars she will now be given a paid vacation until further notice. She will not be found guilty because she works in law enforcement and because both she and the judge get their paychecks from the same place.
This post was edited on 9/7/18 at 3:12 pm
Posted on 9/7/18 at 3:11 pm to Ponchy Tiger
quote:
If a regular citizen did this they would be locked up for murder
A regular citizen would probably be charged with involuntary manslaughter and would have to post bail to be released.
It will likely happen with this woman too
Posted on 9/7/18 at 3:12 pm to Thias2685
quote:Is that what we're calling being arrested for manslaughter now, a paid vacation?
By courtesy of your tax dollars she will now be given a paid vacation until further notice.
Posted on 9/7/18 at 3:12 pm to Thias2685
quote:
A woman illegally entered a man's apartment and murdered him. By courtesy of your tax dollars she will now be given a paid vacation until further notice. She will not be found guilty because she works in law enforcement and because both she and the judge get their paychecks from the same place.
Someone didn't bother getting up to date on the events.
Posted on 9/7/18 at 3:12 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
And like I said much earlier in this thread, those are not the actual words you said. Maybe if you repeat it enough, they'll change.
My quote:
quote:
Any other person would already be in jail. That's the point. They wouldn't have their name withheld from the media for this long either.
That was my first post, and it was in response to you.
Any other person would already be in jail. Their name wouldn't be withheld either. I still believe that to be true.
Popular
Back to top


3



