- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

UPDATE Georgia Cop faces 35 Years for shooting unarmed man
Posted on 10/15/19 at 7:25 pm
Posted on 10/15/19 at 7:25 pm
Update bottom of op.
Has this been covered yet?
Local News station link
LINK
The jury let him off on murder, which would have mandatory life sentence.
But they found him guilty of aggravated assault and some other small shite, and he's facing 35 years, sentencing on Nov 1.
He's a veteran on the force who had never had any conduct issues, never had any reports of excessive force, etc.
The deceased was a 26 year old mentally ill afghan vet that was running around naked in apartment complex, cops show up, guy charges cop, cop shoots. Cops had no advance knowledge the guy was off his meds or was mentally challenged, etc.
Doesn't seem like that big of a deal, just a shitty situation.
But here's where it gets sticky.
Cop is white.
Victim is black.
Jurisdiction is 90% black.
Jury is black.
Judge is black female, well known radical liberal judge.
He fricked.
About a week before all this happened, I was in a fender bender and this cop worked my accident. I was the victim, a lady rear ended me. He treated me like a criminal, he was probably the most dickhead cop I've ever encountered. At least the second most dickhead. Definitely top 3. Anyways, he still doesn't deserve to go to prison for defending himself on a call where a crazy dude charged him.
What say yall?
Sorry if already posted.
UPDATE-
12 years. Sentenced.
Has this been covered yet?
Local News station link
LINK
The jury let him off on murder, which would have mandatory life sentence.
But they found him guilty of aggravated assault and some other small shite, and he's facing 35 years, sentencing on Nov 1.
He's a veteran on the force who had never had any conduct issues, never had any reports of excessive force, etc.
The deceased was a 26 year old mentally ill afghan vet that was running around naked in apartment complex, cops show up, guy charges cop, cop shoots. Cops had no advance knowledge the guy was off his meds or was mentally challenged, etc.
Doesn't seem like that big of a deal, just a shitty situation.
But here's where it gets sticky.
Cop is white.
Victim is black.
Jurisdiction is 90% black.
Jury is black.
Judge is black female, well known radical liberal judge.
He fricked.
About a week before all this happened, I was in a fender bender and this cop worked my accident. I was the victim, a lady rear ended me. He treated me like a criminal, he was probably the most dickhead cop I've ever encountered. At least the second most dickhead. Definitely top 3. Anyways, he still doesn't deserve to go to prison for defending himself on a call where a crazy dude charged him.
What say yall?
Sorry if already posted.
UPDATE-
12 years. Sentenced.
This post was edited on 11/1/19 at 3:34 pm
Posted on 10/15/19 at 7:26 pm to deeprig9
Yeah it’s been covered.
No one cares
No one cares
Posted on 10/15/19 at 7:28 pm to deeprig9
If the victim were a white crazy dude, never would have been a trial. Especially if the cop was black.
Posted on 10/15/19 at 7:45 pm to deeprig9
What were the facts leading to the 2 violations of oath convictions and making a false statement conviction?
Posted on 10/15/19 at 8:13 pm to Obtuse1
quote:
What were the facts leading to the 2 violations of oath convictions
There were no facts. Just that the jury thinks he used excessive force, therefore violated his oath to protect and serve. It's a BS charge. But one he was convicted on, and will be sentenced for.
quote:
making a false statement
This one is also muddy bullshite.
Alot of what has come out from the jury this week is that they were deadlocked on the murder charge for a week, so the jury made a deal where the not-guilty voters would vote guilty on the lesser charges, and the guilty-voters would vote not-guilty on the felony murder. A compromise. The charge itself is unfounded.
This really is an abortion of justice.
Posted on 10/15/19 at 8:20 pm to deeprig9
WhY dIdNT hE jUsT ShOot Him In ThE Leg
Posted on 10/15/19 at 8:37 pm to deeprig9
I remember when this happened years ago. Wonder why it took so long to finally go to trial.
The naked guy was unarmed so he should serve time for something.
The naked guy was unarmed so he should serve time for something.
Posted on 10/15/19 at 8:40 pm to Hoops
If I am a white policeman working in a minority, majority district I am getting a new job.
It is a no win situation.
It is a no win situation.
Posted on 10/15/19 at 8:42 pm to Korin
quote:
The naked guy was unarmed so he should serve time for something.
This is the dumbest take I've seen in a while.
Posted on 10/15/19 at 8:52 pm to deeprig9
If I were white, I wouldnt police a majority black area. Why police an area where the people hate you because of the color of your skin?
Posted on 10/15/19 at 9:31 pm to TigersSEC2010
quote:ironically, your take is far dumber and you prob don't know why
This is the dumbest take I've seen in a while.
Posted on 10/15/19 at 9:34 pm to arcalades
Naked guy with no weapon?
Sorry, I don't see a reason to shoot the guy. Don't they carry nightsticks anymore?
Sorry, I don't see a reason to shoot the guy. Don't they carry nightsticks anymore?
Posted on 10/15/19 at 9:47 pm to deeprig9
frick being a cop in 2019.
Double frick being a white cop in 2019.
Grand frick being a white cop in a black district in 2019.
Double frick being a white cop in 2019.
Grand frick being a white cop in a black district in 2019.
Posted on 10/15/19 at 10:15 pm to BuckyCheese
quote:
Naked guy with no weapon?
Sorry, I don't see a reason to shoot the guy. Don't they carry nightsticks anymore?
The cop did it by the book. If you want to put the system on trial, then put the system on trial. Change the book. But this one cop who did everything he was trained to do, by the book, shouldn't spend the rest of his life in prison.
Posted on 10/15/19 at 11:37 pm to deeprig9
quote:
Cop is white.
Victim is black.
Jurisdiction is 90% black.
Jury is black.
Judge is black female, well known radical liberal judge.
Goodnight, sweet prince
Posted on 10/15/19 at 11:49 pm to 225Tyga
Well then butt the hell out the topic then
Posted on 10/16/19 at 2:42 am to deeprig9
quote:
The cop did it by the book. If you want to put the system on trial, then put the system on trial. Change the book. But this one cop who did everything he was trained to do, by the book, shouldn't spend the rest of his life in prison.
I'm not taking a stand on one sidorit the other because I just don't have enough information about this particular instance, but I do want to know when "the book" was changed to "kill all unarmed naked people running at you." When cops routinely carry sticks, mace, and tasers why exactly does naked and unarmed equal instant kill?
Posted on 10/16/19 at 3:28 am to Merck
Was this on a clear and sunny day? Or at least a well lit area with no obstructed view? He could have easily had a weapon. Bc “he was naked” could be as accurate as “hands up don’t shoot” from a few years ago.
Popular
Back to top


21









