Started By
Message

re: UPDATE: Body found in Brian Laundrie search

Posted on 9/21/21 at 8:23 am to
Posted by 4WHLN
Drinking at the Cottage Inn
Member since Mar 2013
7615 posts
Posted on 9/21/21 at 8:23 am to
Some of you people are trying to make a mountain out of a mole hill with this.

Trying to keep up in this thread is making my head hurt.

- Holy shite, wheres the Tylenol


Posted by baldona
Florida
Member since Feb 2016
22516 posts
Posted on 9/21/21 at 8:24 am to
quote:

Okay.
The main takeaway here is BL did in fact return on Sept 1 to Florida.


I do not believe this is fact yet.

There are 2 facts, that we know:
1.) his vehicle returned to Florida
2.) his parents claim he was home

For all we know, his dad met him somewhere and drove it home.

Unless I’m forgetting something?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
452741 posts
Posted on 9/21/21 at 8:24 am to
quote:

The main takeaway here is BL did in fact return on Sept 1 to Florida

That's one of the few facts we know 100%. Nobody is disputing that. The issue is when he left the west, why he left, the status of GP, what his goal in going to FL was, etc.
Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54697 posts
Posted on 9/21/21 at 8:25 am to
quote:

However, the actual facts are very sparse.

quote:
. The facts paint a pretty clear, if incomplete, picture.

Not really, without a TON of speculation based on very incomplete facts.
This is silly.

B and G set out on a cross country trip together.
B and G have strain on their relationship that causes them to get physical with each other.
B drives the couples van/home cross country without G.
B refuse to help G’s family or LE find G.
B intentionally goes missing himself
G’s dead body found near where the van that B drove cross country without her has been spotted.

It’s pretty clear and simple. I can play psychologist all day long on the various reasons some of you want it to be more complicated, but that doesn’t change the pretty clear picture painted by the facts.
Posted by TackySweater
Member since Dec 2020
20975 posts
Posted on 9/21/21 at 8:25 am to
Was it a traffic light photo showing him or was it a license plate reader that just showed the van?
Posted by TackySweater
Member since Dec 2020
20975 posts
Posted on 9/21/21 at 8:28 am to
Wasn’t it like 40 degrees and they all had coats on?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
452741 posts
Posted on 9/21/21 at 8:28 am to
quote:

B and G have strain on their relationship that causes them to get physical with each other.

Again, assumption. We only have the video that shows she was physical with her b/c of her "OCD" and anxiety.

quote:

B drives the couples van/home cross country without G.

We don't know it was without her. Again, assumption.

quote:

B refuse to help G’s family or LE find G.

We don't know this, either. We won't until LEO releases a report. What we hear in the public isn't what is actually going on behind the scenes.

quote:

B intentionally goes missing himself

Again, assumption. There were some reports yesterday that LEO knew where he was.

quote:

G’s dead body

Not a fact. This is an assumption without full corroboration.

Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
283548 posts
Posted on 9/21/21 at 8:28 am to
quote:

I don't think they were unreasonable.


Not in the least.

Posted by baldona
Florida
Member since Feb 2016
22516 posts
Posted on 9/21/21 at 8:28 am to
quote:

Was it a traffic light photo showing him or was it a license plate reader that just showed the van?



That’s what I’m saying, it was a license plate reader on the toll road. I don’t believe there is any evidence he was 100% home.

I do believe there are reports from neighbors that he was seen though? The police seem to be confident he was home, so I’m assuming he was. But from all accounts online and to the media that I have seen, there is no evidence of him at home.

I’m surprised no one in the media has interviewed a neighbor to see if they have actually seen him.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
452741 posts
Posted on 9/21/21 at 8:29 am to
quote:

Was it a traffic light photo showing him or was it a license plate reader that just showed the van?

I believe it was a license plate scanner, but if LEO thought that the dad was involved in moving the van I can't imagine he'd be outside of jail right now for obstruction. If he has a cell phone it would be easy to prove.
Posted by Motorboat
At the camp
Member since Oct 2007
23480 posts
Posted on 9/21/21 at 8:29 am to
quote:

What he said was quite the opposite of implying "fact". You are pretty quick to jump on someone with an opinion.


sorry. I missed the "I bet" part. My apologies
Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54697 posts
Posted on 9/21/21 at 8:29 am to
quote:

I’m surprised no one in the media has interviewed a neighbor to see if they have actually seen him.
They have
Posted by Lee Beauregard
NOLA
Member since May 2018
503 posts
Posted on 9/21/21 at 8:29 am to
quote:

I do not believe this is fact yet. For all we know his dad met him somewhere and drove it back



This seems highly unlikely,
Ask yourself how did the dad get out to meet him..?
And how did they communicate?



It’s BL on that traffic light photo at 10:34am Sept 1.



This post was edited on 9/21/21 at 8:31 am
Posted by SouthEndzoneTiger
Louisiana
Member since Mar 2008
11160 posts
Posted on 9/21/21 at 8:29 am to
quote:

Was it a traffic light photo showing him or was it a license plate reader that just showed the van?


IMO he is definitely back in Florida. Even if it was just a plate reader, LEO wouldn't be looking for him in Florida if they didn't have verifiable evidence that he is/was there. We haven't been told by them, but I'm quite sure they could have pinged his phone or something to confirm he was in Florida at such and such date.
Posted by AUCE05
Member since Dec 2009
43826 posts
Posted on 9/21/21 at 8:29 am to
Their is a new interest in the preserve today.
Posted by baldona
Florida
Member since Feb 2016
22516 posts
Posted on 9/21/21 at 8:31 am to
quote:

believe it was a license plate scanner, but if LEO thought that the dad was involved in moving the van I can't imagine he'd be outside of jail right now for obstruction. If he has a cell phone it would be easy to prove.


What would he be in jail for? Obstruction of justice for what?

I’d assume that with traffic cameras they would be able to know for a fact that BL drove the vehicle. But with masks and shite now a days, who knows honestly?
Posted by LSU6262
Member since Jun 2008
7889 posts
Posted on 9/21/21 at 8:32 am to
quote:

B and G have strain on their relationship that causes them to get physical with each other.

Again, assumption. We only have the video that shows she was physical with her b/c of her "OCD" and anxiety.


2 911 calls as well
Posted by BamaGradinTn
Murfreesboro
Member since Dec 2008
27880 posts
Posted on 9/21/21 at 8:33 am to
quote:

B drives the couples van/home cross country without G.

We don't know it was without her. Again, assumption


We should know if this is true when the autopsy and DNA tests are completed today.

quote:

B refuse to help G’s family or LE find G.

We don't know this, either.


Well, that depends on whether or not you believe the public statements of G's family.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
452741 posts
Posted on 9/21/21 at 8:33 am to
quote:

Obstruction of justice for what?

If a father is moving a van from a likely crime site, from out west all the way to Florida, the obstruction allegation isn't exactly difficult to make.

Here is part of Louisiana's definition:

quote:

A. The crime of obstruction of justice is any of the following when committed with the knowledge that such act has, reasonably may, or will affect an actual or potential present, past, or future criminal proceeding as described in this Section:

(1) Tampering with evidence with the specific intent of distorting the results of any criminal investigation or proceeding which may reasonably prove relevant to a criminal investigation or proceeding. Tampering with evidence shall include the intentional alteration, movement, removal, or addition of any object or substance either:

(a) At the location of any incident which the perpetrator knows or has good reason to believe will be the subject of any investigation by state, local, or United States law enforcement officers; or

(b) At the location of storage, transfer, or place of review of any such evidence.
Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54697 posts
Posted on 9/21/21 at 8:34 am to
quote:

We only have the video that shows she was physical with her b/c of her "OCD" and anxiety.
No we also have recorded audio of eyewitnesses relating him slapping her.

quote:

We don't know it was without her.
Yeah we do.

quote:

We don't know this, either. We won't until LEO releases a report.
Yeah we do.

quote:

Again, assumption.
Yeah, I’m assuming police don’t send everyone they have on a search of a preserve if they aren’t looking for him.

quote:

Not a fact.
Yeah, it’s a fact.

You can pretend, for whatever weird reasons you have in your psychology that these things aren’t facts, but I’ll operate in reality using reason and good judgment.
Jump to page
Page First 283 284 285 286 287 ... 549
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 285 of 549Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram