- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Univeristy of Alabama school tested 30,000 students for covid: 0.83% positive rate
Posted on 8/13/20 at 2:24 pm to lsupride87
Posted on 8/13/20 at 2:24 pm to lsupride87
quote:
Yet, I see alabama as a state goes off the 10% number when reporting, and that is the number they use for phasing....
You think that means they are saying 10% of the population has covid at this time?
This post was edited on 8/13/20 at 2:24 pm
Posted on 8/13/20 at 2:24 pm to lsupride87
quote:Because they are reporting the percentage of positive of people tested. Everyone knows that mostly symptomatic people are being tested. This isn't a new revelation.
Yet, I see alabama as a state goes off the 10% number when reporting,
Posted on 8/13/20 at 2:25 pm to lsupride87
quote:
0.83% positive rate
Posted on 8/13/20 at 2:26 pm to WDE24
quote:Then why in the holy blue hell are they using that number to determine phasing guidelines THAT IS MY ENTIRE POINT
Because they are reporting the percentage of positive of people tested. Everyone knows that mostly symptomatic people are being tested. This isn't a new revelation.
When this thing is almost completely over, the percent positive of those getting tested will likely be even higher
It makes absolutely no sense to care about percent positive of just those tested
Posted on 8/13/20 at 2:28 pm to lsupride87
quote:I haven't once seen Alabama cite that as the sole source of it's phasing guidelines. Maybe I missed it.
Then why in the holy blue hell are they using that number to determine phasing guidelines
When testing demand and testing increase are occurring at the same time percent positive is increasing, then it is an indication of spread rather than regression.
This post was edited on 8/13/20 at 2:29 pm
Posted on 8/13/20 at 2:28 pm to fightin tigers
quote:No, which is my entire point
You think that means they are saying 10% of the population has covid at this time?
What is worse
A. 1% of population actually infected, but 20% positivity rate for those tested
B. 20% of population actually infected, but only 1% positivty for those tested
The state is telling us Option A is worse
Posted on 8/13/20 at 2:29 pm to lsupride87
quote:
Then why in the holy blue hell are they using that number to determine phasing guidelines THAT IS MY ENTIRE POINT
Threshold for exponential spread
Posted on 8/13/20 at 2:29 pm to WDE24
quote:You have
I haven't once seen Alabama cite that as the sole source of it's phasing guidelines. Maybe I missed it.
phasing guidelines relies on 14 days of percent positive testing being being below a benchmark (5-10% depending on phase)
Posted on 8/13/20 at 2:29 pm to lsupride87
So, people who get tested because they feel symptoms have a higher positive percentage than a random sampling?
Shocked. Shocked I tell you.
Idiot.
Just a guess, but I'll bet women who show signs of being pregnant, test positive for being pregnant more than an average woman.
Shocked. Shocked I tell you.
Idiot.
Just a guess, but I'll bet women who show signs of being pregnant, test positive for being pregnant more than an average woman.
Posted on 8/13/20 at 2:30 pm to lsupride87
quote:
A. 1% of population actually infected, but 20% positivity rate for those tested
B. 20% of population actually infected, but only 1% positivty for those tested
That is why a certain amount of testing is required
Posted on 8/13/20 at 2:30 pm to BayouBlitz
quote:Real genius you are
So, people who get tested because they feel symptoms have a higher positive percentage than a random sampling?
Shocked. Shocked I tell you.
Idiot.
Just a guess, but I'll bet women who show signs of being pregnant, test positive for being pregnant more than an average woman.
Posted on 8/13/20 at 2:31 pm to fightin tigers
quote:Clearly not enough, if a random sample of 30,000 is roughly 11 times lower than what your testing is showing.......
That is why a certain amount of testing is required
Posted on 8/13/20 at 2:32 pm to lsupride87
quote:
Clearly not enough, if a random sample of 30,000 is roughly 11 times lower than what your testing is showing.......
Testing isn't trying to determine if the entire population is infected.
Posted on 8/13/20 at 2:32 pm to lsupride87
quote:That's a great citation to Alabama's approach.
You have
phasing guidelines relies on 14 days of percent positive testing being being below a benchmark (5-10% depending on phase)
Posted on 8/13/20 at 2:34 pm to WDE24
quote:Here you go for Alabama specifically
That's a great citation to Alabama's approach
quote:LINK
If a county meets the measure of at least 0.8% of its citizens being tested over the most recent 14-day period, the county remains in the same level as the initial assessment above. If fewer than 0.8% of the population was tested, then the county will move up one level (i.e., low to moderate). The percentage of positive tests is also taken into consideration, with the goal being a significant decrease in the percentage positive and/or less than 10% of people tested resulting in a positive test result. If a county fails this measure but passes the measure to test 0.8% of the population, it will still move up a level as this indicates a potentially higher percentage of persons with COVID-19. If a county fails both measures, it will still only move up one level. If a county passes both measures, it will remain at the same level.
This post was edited on 8/13/20 at 2:35 pm
Posted on 8/13/20 at 2:34 pm to lsupride87
I believe that is possible because its college kids. They are out doing shite.. But how many of the 30,000 were extremely sick or hospitalized?
Posted on 8/13/20 at 2:34 pm to lsupride87
quote:
Our main indicator for limiting the risk of COVID-19 spread in the community is the number of days a county has a downward trend of new cases each day. Whether the case counts are increasing or decreasing influences a county’s level (e.g., low risk). In determining the trajectory of cases, there is a five-day grace period, meaning that each county can have up to five days with an increase in new cases in a 14-day window before they are considered to not be in a downward trajectory. The purpose of the five-day grace period is to account for minor fluctuations that do not truly change the downward trend in cases.
If the number of cases is staying the same or is increasing, the category will be Very High Risk (Red).
If a county has decreasing case counts for 1 to 6 days, they will begin in the High Risk (orange) category.
If a county is in a downward trajectory of 7-13 days, they will begin in the Moderate (yellow) category.
If a county is in a downward trajectory of 14 or more days (or has a rate of 10 or less over the previous 2 weeks), they will begin in the Low Risk (green) category.
Several factors can influence a county’s trajectory of COVID-19 cases, so other factors are examined to additionally inform which level a county should be in.
You're such a disengenious clown.
This post was edited on 8/13/20 at 2:36 pm
Posted on 8/13/20 at 2:35 pm to WDE24
quote:You missed this champ
WDE24
quote:
If a county meets the measure of at least 0.8% of its citizens being tested over the most recent 14-day period, the county remains in the same level as the initial assessment above. If fewer than 0.8% of the population was tested, then the county will move up one level (i.e., low to moderate). The percentage of positive tests is also taken into consideration, with the goal being a significant decrease in the percentage positive and/or less than 10% of people tested resulting in a positive test result. If a county fails this measure but passes the measure to test 0.8% of the population, it will still move up a level as this indicates a potentially higher percentage of persons with COVID-19. If a county fails both measures, it will still only move up one level. If a county passes both measures, it will remain at the same level.
quote:You didnt keep reading, clown
You're such a disengenious clown.
This post was edited on 8/13/20 at 2:37 pm
Posted on 8/13/20 at 2:36 pm to lsupride87
quote:No, you just completely misrepresent what it says in context.
You missed this champ
Posted on 8/13/20 at 2:37 pm to WDE24
quote:It literally tells you percent positive goals(10%), and decreasing, is needed/taken into consideration for moving up or down levels
No, you just completely misrepresent what it says in context.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News