- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: United's dragged passenger hires high-powered Chicago personal injury lawyer
Posted on 4/13/17 at 9:25 am to NYNolaguy1
Posted on 4/13/17 at 9:25 am to NYNolaguy1
You edited it after I pointed it out. I even posted the entire message for you.
It's weird to deny it.
1
Posted on 4/13/17 at 9:26 am to NYNolaguy1
quote:
If you tell a police officer "no" after him asking to search your house without a warrant, are you being unruly?
Not this stupid point again....
Posted on 4/13/17 at 9:29 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
Link one of them. Just one.
150+ posts. Link yourself.
quote:
Weak.
You can't even handle the weak stuff. You don't deserve anything more.
Posted on 4/13/17 at 9:32 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
You edited it after I pointed it out. I even posted the entire message for you.
I copied the same link back into the first one (that worked the first time) to make sure it was working (again). It did then, and it does now.
Like I said, it's precious you think me being shady is the only way to get a broken link.
This post was edited on 4/13/17 at 9:35 am
Posted on 4/13/17 at 9:36 am to NYNolaguy1
quote:
If you tell a police officer "no" after him asking to search your house without a warrant, are you being unruly?
Searching my house without a warrant is illegal
Removing me from the house WHEN THEY HAVE A WARRANT, and I wont let them in, is legal
They had the legal right to remove the unruly passenger
Posted on 4/13/17 at 9:36 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
quote:
If United calls security to have someone removed from a flight, they did it whether it was them physically doing it or not.
That isn't how it works.
The police were following United direction, it was a civil matter and United was saying he was breaking their contract. If the guy was simply sitting in his seat, he was doing absolutely nothing against the airport law. He was just not following Uniteds orders. He had a ticket and was in his seat, please explain what law was being broken?
Therefore, if United was wrong in asking him to leave this is almost all on United. The only way the police are in trouble is if they used improper technique to remove him and if their protocol should of been to walk away instead of removing him.
This post was edited on 4/13/17 at 9:38 am
Posted on 4/13/17 at 9:39 am to League Champs
quote:
Searching my house without a warrant is illegal
So would demanding a passenger to leave who has a legal right to be there, no?
In your opinion, what did this passenger do to be unruly?
Posted on 4/13/17 at 10:00 am to NYNolaguy1
quote:
It did then, and it does now.
I copied the message. You edited it because it didn't work.
Denying it is still weird.
Posted on 4/13/17 at 10:07 am to nc14
quote:
But why did the leg need a crew?
This is important, I need to know why.
Posted on 4/13/17 at 10:09 am to baldona
this lawyer seems like the ultimate ambulance chaser
I know United is in the wrong, but my God lawyers are the scummiest group of people on the face of the earth
I know United is in the wrong, but my God lawyers are the scummiest group of people on the face of the earth
Posted on 4/13/17 at 10:17 am to TigersHuskers
So United needed those seats for their employees to get to work the next morning...Irony at it's best...
This post was edited on 4/13/17 at 10:19 am
Posted on 4/13/17 at 10:25 am to TigersHuskers
quote:
this lawyer seems like the ultimate ambulance chaser
Watching and I think the opposite, respectfully. His presentation isn't over the top, IMO. He's used pretty plain and succinct language throughout. That firm is going to rip an a-hole into both United and City of Chicago it sounds like. You can tell his team doesn't play.
Posted on 4/13/17 at 10:29 am to Sao
That lawyer just won the lawsuit lottery...
Posted on 4/13/17 at 10:33 am to League Champs
quote:You think he was removed from the plane for being unruly?
The man was clearly being unruly. UA had established rules and policies, and after being informed of them, the man refused to comply. Police were then called.
Why was he being unruly?
Posted on 4/13/17 at 10:34 am to Hangover Haven
Daughter is pretty cute, too. Well-educated and likely well off family by appearances. That could be their lead in court as well. They don't need the money but will gladly be the new face of airline passenger respect and safety. I'd take a concussion and two missing teeth for the opp
Posted on 4/13/17 at 10:34 am to League Champs
quote:We don't know this.
They had the legal right to remove the unruly passenger
Posted on 4/13/17 at 10:48 am to shel311
quote:
We don't know this.
We also don't know they were not. United thought they were within the rights set-forth in their code of carriage to deny the passenger entry on the final manifest. The argument is simply when a flight is determined to be oversold. If it is when the decision is made then United was within the rights of their agreement. If it is when the system information has been input and all staff notified then they did not have authority to assess involuntary denial of passage. Lodging + meals or rental car, in addition to $1k cash per seat and full refund of ticket or exchange plus upgrade and they would have saved a pretty penny here. May have even had more than 4 people volunteer. Would have to think moving forward all airlines will up the ante to garner volunteers. In the end this is a good thing for air travelers moving forward.
This post was edited on 4/13/17 at 10:50 am
Posted on 4/13/17 at 10:53 am to AwesomeSauce
quote:
We also don't know they were not. United thought they were within the rights set-forth in their code of carriage to deny the passenger entry on the final manifest.
They also said it wasnt oversold after the fact... But as some pointed out that could be to try and blow this over.
My question is if the Dr wants to really be a pain in the arse and bring this to court (he won't) that statement will bite UA in the arse.
Posted on 4/13/17 at 10:56 am to NYNolaguy1
quote:
They also said it wasnt oversold after the fact... But as some pointed out that could be to try and blow this over.
My question is if the Dr wants to really be a pain in the arse and bring this to court (he won't) that statement will bite UA in the arse.
Did they? We had a back and forth yesterday because you kept posting the same quote which was "overbooked" and I tried for a couple of pages to explain the difference to you and why United chose the verbiage.
Posted on 4/13/17 at 10:58 am to AwesomeSauce
quote:Correct, which is what I've said for 3 days now. I've never said we know with 100% certainty, I'm calling out others for acting like they do.
We also don't know they were not
quote:This is correct, though UA has told us it was not oversold.
The argument is simply when a flight is determined to be oversold
This post was edited on 4/13/17 at 10:59 am
Page 34 of 36
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News