- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

UK University Costs - For UK residents, cheaper than most private high schools in U.S.
Posted on 7/26/22 at 10:49 am
Posted on 7/26/22 at 10:49 am
Including Oxford and Cambridge...
~$12,000 at highest end (avg is closer to $8,000) per year for tuition and fees. And appears to have abundant merit-based opportunities to reduce this further.
How does that compare to Harvard and Yale or UCLA and Berkeley or LSU and ULL?
LINK
Discuss! At face value, UK seems to have this right (especially the 3-years vs. 4-years undergraduate model...always thought fat/repetitive with High Schools in U.S. undergrad programs)
Of course, total cost not made clear:
UK taxes
Residency costs
Etc.
But face value, seems UK has something right when U.S. has opportunities to improve
~$12,000 at highest end (avg is closer to $8,000) per year for tuition and fees. And appears to have abundant merit-based opportunities to reduce this further.
How does that compare to Harvard and Yale or UCLA and Berkeley or LSU and ULL?
LINK
quote:
Many undergraduates in UK pay up to £9,250 per annum (year) in tuition costs (the cost of education is capped by the government). The average is approximately £6,000 per annum.
quote:
As an undergraduate, you would only take three years of schooling (as opposed to four) and postgraduate studies (Master’s Degrees) only take one year to complete.
Discuss! At face value, UK seems to have this right (especially the 3-years vs. 4-years undergraduate model...always thought fat/repetitive with High Schools in U.S. undergrad programs)
Of course, total cost not made clear:
UK taxes
Residency costs
Etc.
But face value, seems UK has something right when U.S. has opportunities to improve
Posted on 7/26/22 at 10:50 am to Turf Taint
quote:
UK taxes
There's your answer
Posted on 7/26/22 at 10:50 am to Turf Taint
quote:yea but then you have to go to uk
But face value, seems UK has something right when U.S. has opportunities to improve
Posted on 7/26/22 at 10:51 am to Turf Taint
it was "free" in the 60's. Then the working class started paying attention to their tax liability in the 90's.
It benefitted the wealthy, which is why it ended.
It benefitted the wealthy, which is why it ended.
This post was edited on 7/26/22 at 10:53 am
Posted on 7/26/22 at 10:52 am to Turf Taint
I thought it would be even cheaper. I think in other European countries you only pay parking and maybe books.
Posted on 7/26/22 at 10:52 am to Turf Taint
It’s through their taxes.
That said, I’m willing to bet it’s still significantly cheaper even with taxes then US universities.
That said, I’m willing to bet it’s still significantly cheaper even with taxes then US universities.
Posted on 7/26/22 at 10:53 am to Turf Taint
College should be difficult to be accepted to and cheap once accepted.
Posted on 7/26/22 at 10:54 am to Turf Taint
So I think there is some misconception here. I did study abroad at Regent's in London and Cambridge. The campuses are typically smaller, curriculum more focused and facilities less modern.
There is also less staff. Their summer programs are bare bones.
They also don't run electricity (aka AC majority of the day) all day besides essentials.
There are a-lot of factors that make it more cost effective overall.
There is also less staff. Their summer programs are bare bones.
They also don't run electricity (aka AC majority of the day) all day besides essentials.
There are a-lot of factors that make it more cost effective overall.
Posted on 7/26/22 at 10:55 am to wileyjones
quote:
yea but then you have to go to uk
Interestingly a degree from St Andrews is about the same. That's a world class degree for not a lot of money.
Posted on 7/26/22 at 10:55 am to Turf Taint
Yea, but Kentucky has good bourbon
Posted on 7/26/22 at 10:55 am to Turf Taint
Tax rates in the UK start at 40% if you earn around $40,000 or more.
That's how their shite gets paid for.
That's how their shite gets paid for.
Posted on 7/26/22 at 10:56 am to NYNolaguy1
quote:
Interestingly a degree from St Andrews is about the same
I think he was making fun of our own Kentucky.
Posted on 7/26/22 at 10:57 am to DiamondDog
quote:
So I think there is some misconception here. I did study abroad at Regent's in London and Cambridge. The campuses are typically smaller, curriculum more focused and facilities less modern.
There is also less staff. Their summer programs are bare bones.
They also don't run electricity (aka AC majority of the day) all day besides essentials.
There are a-lot of factors that make it more cost effective overall.
All of which colleges here should adopt. There's tons of fat to trim.
Posted on 7/26/22 at 10:58 am to NYNolaguy1
No argument there, but there's more to it then just deferring costs to the taxpayer.
Posted on 7/26/22 at 10:59 am to Turf Taint
Just keep in mind:
LINK /
"If Britain were a U.S. state, it would be the second-poorest, behind Alabama and before Mississippi"
so even their top universities cannot charge high tuition like we see in the US, because their upper middle class cannot handle it. The income you may make in Britain is surprisingly lower than for a comparable job in much of the US. For example, it's routine for police administrators to make over $100,000 a year in the US, and in some departments (including NOPD) line officers can make that much. In Britain there would be very few police jobs paying that well.
Last thought on college- our cost of college is distorted thanks to government subsidies of the student loan industry, which leads to the sickening growth of debt.
This chart, comparing the growth in prices for items subsidized vs not subsidized by the government, is quite revealing:
LINK
LINK /
"If Britain were a U.S. state, it would be the second-poorest, behind Alabama and before Mississippi"
quote:
If Britain were to join the United States, it would be the second-poorest state, behind Alabama and ahead of Mississippi.
The ranking, determined by Fraser Nelson, an editor of The Spectator magazine, was made by dividing the gross domestic product of each state by its population, and it took into account purchasing power parity for cost of living. Several other European countries were also included in the ranking.
so even their top universities cannot charge high tuition like we see in the US, because their upper middle class cannot handle it. The income you may make in Britain is surprisingly lower than for a comparable job in much of the US. For example, it's routine for police administrators to make over $100,000 a year in the US, and in some departments (including NOPD) line officers can make that much. In Britain there would be very few police jobs paying that well.
Last thought on college- our cost of college is distorted thanks to government subsidies of the student loan industry, which leads to the sickening growth of debt.
This chart, comparing the growth in prices for items subsidized vs not subsidized by the government, is quite revealing:
LINK
Posted on 7/26/22 at 11:00 am to Turf Taint
quote:
Oxford and Cambridge
Pretty sure they have strict entrance standards and it's not a free for all like LSU

Posted on 7/26/22 at 11:06 am to NYNolaguy1
To give you an idea about facilities. Cambridge and LSU close to similar enrollments.
Cambridge is 710 acres vs LSU's 4,925.
Cambridge 3,600 administrative staff...LSU has 5,000
Cambridge has more academic staff but majority are part-time or research fellows.
Just more efficient from top to bottom.
Cambridge is 710 acres vs LSU's 4,925.
Cambridge 3,600 administrative staff...LSU has 5,000
Cambridge has more academic staff but majority are part-time or research fellows.
Just more efficient from top to bottom.
Posted on 7/26/22 at 11:09 am to NYNolaguy1
quote:
Interestingly a degree from St Andrews is about the same. That's a world class degree for not a lot of money
And you get to play St Andrews for student rates and can get tee times
Posted on 7/26/22 at 11:11 am to DiamondDog
quote:
There is also less staff. Their summer programs are bare bones.
They also don't run electricity (aka AC majority of the day) all day besides essentials.
There are a-lot of factors that make it more cost effective overall.
So.... No lazy rivers to float in
Posted on 7/26/22 at 11:14 am to Turf Taint
The US government has driven up tuition costs by subsidizing student loans.
Popular
Back to top
