- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 1/13/16 at 2:43 pm to MightyYat
You're right... 
I had a 95 Tahoe... 
and yes, it was not a good front end...
I had a 95 Tahoe... and yes, it was not a good front end...
This post was edited on 1/13/16 at 2:44 pm
Posted on 1/13/16 at 2:48 pm to RedRifle
yes but you couldnt have picked an uglier one to represent us Tundra lovers.
Posted on 1/13/16 at 2:50 pm to MightyYat
quote:
That's not ground effects.
Oh, no shite?
maybe that's why I said "Wit" some ground effects...as in to add some. And some 20s.
That thing looks like a 300 with a bed attached as it is, but it's just begging to be tricked out deep in the hood.
Congrats on your name. Fitting.
Posted on 1/13/16 at 2:52 pm to Hangover Haven
quote:
That front end was 20 years ago...
That's right, and I still haven't forgiven them for fricking up a classic pickup.
Posted on 1/13/16 at 2:53 pm to 19
quote:
19
You must be visually allergic to gold bowties if you think the '16 Silverado's front is legitimately ugly. At least you display no preference for the egg-crate grille of the 14s and 15s; I'd have already called the police if that was the case.
Posted on 1/13/16 at 2:56 pm to RedRifle
Posted on 1/13/16 at 2:59 pm to Them
quote:
if you think the '16 Silverado's front is legitimately ugly
No, not ugly. It just looks like it's aimed at specific demographics, the "show truck" crowd being the big one.
The ones that would ADD ground effects and thin 20s with lots of lights and after-market...shite.
quote:
visually allergic to gold bowties
I have no idea what this means
This post was edited on 1/13/16 at 3:00 pm
Posted on 1/13/16 at 2:59 pm to N2cars
Looking to trade it in soon. Like the new 4 runner TRD Pro
Posted on 1/13/16 at 3:00 pm to 19
quote:
No, not ugly. It just looks like it's aimed at specific demographics, the "show truck" crowd being the big one.
The ones that would ADD ground effects and thin 20s with lots of lights and after-market...shite.
If anything looks like it goes to a certain demo, the RAM is going in that direction with that ridiculous grill.
Posted on 1/13/16 at 3:01 pm to adp
/thread
Posted on 1/13/16 at 3:02 pm to 19
quote:
Oh, no shite?
maybe that's why I said "Wit" some ground effects...as in to add some. And some 20s.
That thing looks like a 300 with a bed attached as it is, but it's just begging to be tricked out deep in the hood.
Congrats on your name. Fitting.
wtf man.
Posted on 1/13/16 at 3:02 pm to RedRifle
Ugly and shitty gas mileage compared to other full size PUs
Posted on 1/13/16 at 3:03 pm to 19
quote:
The ones that would ADD ground effects and thin 20s with lots of lights and after-market...shite.
I don't think I've seen a newer model any type of truck all tricked out with ground effects and shite in over a decade. That kind of went out with the 90s.
Posted on 1/13/16 at 3:04 pm to StrongBackWeakMind
Don't be so sensitive. You must sell GM products....lol
Posted on 1/13/16 at 3:04 pm to 19
Take it from me, as a Chevy salesman in Montana who sells trucks 4:1 over cars: that "specific demographic" you speak of is 80% of the truck-buying market right now.
80% of my customers don't give a ratfrick about towing or payload or anything utility-related.
80% of my customers want the 6.2 just because it's the biggest and most powerful motor until they figure out they can't afford it becaus you can only get it on a $53k LTZ.
80% of my customers use their crew cab trucks as family vehicles, even though a Chevy Equinox would actually suit their needs better.
80% of people are nonsensical idiot bird-people who like shiny things.
/rant
80% of my customers don't give a ratfrick about towing or payload or anything utility-related.
80% of my customers want the 6.2 just because it's the biggest and most powerful motor until they figure out they can't afford it becaus you can only get it on a $53k LTZ.
80% of my customers use their crew cab trucks as family vehicles, even though a Chevy Equinox would actually suit their needs better.
80% of people are nonsensical idiot bird-people who like shiny things.
/rant
Posted on 1/13/16 at 3:04 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
the RAM is going in that direction with that ridiculous grill.
The Red and Black color scheme makes it look even more in that direction, for sure.
So does the FORD grill. yikes.
Show-truckers drop serious dime on new rides, so I'm sure it's by design.
They live in a tree or still rent, but they'll drop 40 large on a truck, then spend another 10 customizing it...all this for their day to day ride, too.
Posted on 1/13/16 at 3:06 pm to Them
3:04pm - great minds.
PREACH!!!
PREACH!!!
This post was edited on 1/13/16 at 3:08 pm
Posted on 1/13/16 at 3:07 pm to NoBoBullDog
quote:Says the guy that took "your face looks horrible and cheap" seriously.
Don't be so sensitive.
Posted on 1/13/16 at 3:07 pm to 19
By old body style preference for the Tundra:
Do y'all like the 2000-2006 style or the 2007-2013 look better?
Do y'all like the 2000-2006 style or the 2007-2013 look better?
Page 4 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News