Started By
Message

re: .

Posted on 4/17/17 at 1:31 pm to
Posted by Kafka
I am the moral conscience of TD
Member since Jul 2007
141785 posts
Posted on 4/17/17 at 1:31 pm to
quote:

It's a whole bunch of incoherent rambling
slo does the best he can
Posted by StrongBackWeakMind
Member since May 2014
22650 posts
Posted on 4/17/17 at 1:32 pm to
quote:

It's a whole bunch of incoherent rambling.
No shite. Apparently he's either responding to something a random poster or podcaster or youtuber said... or he's created a strawman argument. I have no idea.
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
84837 posts
Posted on 4/17/17 at 1:33 pm to
quote:


the only really well known podcasters (and to say they're d list celebrities would be a stretch) are adam corolla who before that worked on television and was broadcast on the radio to a huge market and joe rogan who was on 2 hit network tv shows


That's not true at all
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 4/17/17 at 1:34 pm to
you're welcome to refute what i'm saying

millenials are so sure they've reinvented the wheel, but none of them can explain it.

I like youtube and podcasting, but tv is the big shark in the ocean and it always will be...once the radio stars die off they may have a point, but in terms of distribution, you rather be rush Limbaugh or howard stern than ben shapiro or sam harris.
Posted by StrongBackWeakMind
Member since May 2014
22650 posts
Posted on 4/17/17 at 1:35 pm to
quote:

you're welcome to refute what i'm saying
Boil it down for us. ETA: And you're welcome to back up anything you've said.

I've done my best to sift through the horseshite you're spewing and address your arguments.

TV subscriptions are plummeting. Podcasts and Youtube are blowing up. I can see the writing on the wall.

ETA2: You keep referring to this "irrelevant" comment. Who made that comment?
This post was edited on 4/17/17 at 1:38 pm
Posted by stout
Smoking Crack with Hunter Biden
Member since Sep 2006
167176 posts
Posted on 4/17/17 at 1:36 pm to
"Those color TVs will never catch on" - Fox Mulder
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 4/17/17 at 1:37 pm to
pewdiepie is his own beast...he's the one case where I can say, he's bigger than most anything on television if not everything...and what he does he can't do on tv.

so if he wants to call shite irrelevant, have at it he can credibly say that.
Posted by LucasP
Member since Apr 2012
21618 posts
Posted on 4/17/17 at 1:38 pm to
quote:

rush Limbaugh or howard stern
quote:

or sam harris.


Apples and potatoes, broseph. The first two are lowest common denominator provocateurs, the latter is an actual writer with something to say. Audiences will always be larger for dumbed down bullshite. So yeah, folks like Sam can't carry a national audience on CNN but that's why YouTube and iTunes are so important.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422187 posts
Posted on 4/17/17 at 1:39 pm to
i emailed wiki like 2 years ago and he never replied
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422187 posts
Posted on 4/17/17 at 1:39 pm to
quote:

No shite. Apparently he's either responding to something a random poster or podcaster or youtuber said... or he's created a strawman argument. I have no idea.

i literally posted what inspired this rant
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 4/17/17 at 1:40 pm to
quote:

TV subscriptions are plummeting. Podcasts and Youtube are blowing up. I can see the writing on the wall.
and? dying? have you seen the fricking ratings books for some of these people? bill gates can blow through a billion dollars and i can find 10k in a parking lot...and?

things reach an equilibrium and without cable and network television, youtube would have a content crisis on their hands.
Posted by StrongBackWeakMind
Member since May 2014
22650 posts
Posted on 4/17/17 at 1:41 pm to
quote:

and?
The literal response to everything you've posted. Babbling with no apparent point.
This post was edited on 4/17/17 at 1:42 pm
Posted by LucasP
Member since Apr 2012
21618 posts
Posted on 4/17/17 at 1:41 pm to
quote:

emailed wiki like 2 years ago and he never replied


Well shite, I guess that was kind of a tall order. How about you just let us know if you ever interview a literate poster who isn't on medication? Deal?
Posted by Kafka
I am the moral conscience of TD
Member since Jul 2007
141785 posts
Posted on 4/17/17 at 1:42 pm to
quote:

i literally posted what inspired this rant


LINK
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 4/17/17 at 1:43 pm to
quote:

Apples and potatoes, broseph. The first two are lowest common denominator provocateurs, the latter is an actual writer with something to say.
agreed. that's not the point. the point is what they say is relevant because 10s of millions hear them.

sam harris was talking as if he could change the election

in media, relevance = audience. i'm all about handing sam harris an audience that size, it's just that he doesn't have an audience that size...not even fricking close.
Posted by Kafka
I am the moral conscience of TD
Member since Jul 2007
141785 posts
Posted on 4/17/17 at 1:43 pm to
quote:

let us know if you ever interview a literate poster who isn't on medication
Kige no longer does interviews
Posted by StrongBackWeakMind
Member since May 2014
22650 posts
Posted on 4/17/17 at 1:43 pm to
quote:

i literally posted what inspired this rant
That thread with 11 responses? Where no one mentioned irrelevant or that podcasts/youtube is taking over?
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 4/17/17 at 1:44 pm to
i know it hurts to read the rest. you millenials have reinvented media.
Posted by StrongBackWeakMind
Member since May 2014
22650 posts
Posted on 4/17/17 at 1:45 pm to
quote:

i know it hurts to read the rest. you millenials have reinvented media.
The rest of what?

You feeling ok, dude?

ETA: From what I've gathered from your incoherent rambling is that Sam Harris called traditional media "irrelevant". Is that correct?

It feels like you've started a argument halfway through and no one has any context.
This post was edited on 4/17/17 at 1:48 pm
Posted by LucasP
Member since Apr 2012
21618 posts
Posted on 4/17/17 at 1:46 pm to
quote:

the point is what they say is relevant because 10s of millions hear them.



I think we have different definitions of the word "point", as you've failed to make one in this thread yet.


But if we did follow your logic, then you could argue that Bob Sagot was the most influential voice of the nineties since so many people watched America's Funniest Home Videos every Sunday.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram