- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Time Names #MeToo Silence Breakers As "Person of the Year"
Posted on 12/6/17 at 2:53 pm to shel311
Posted on 12/6/17 at 2:53 pm to shel311
quote:
You've basically argued that if you're, say, a Victoria's Secret model you can't be sexually harassed or assaulted, so there's that.
no i didnt
youre disgusting for assuming so
Posted on 12/6/17 at 2:54 pm to TH03
quote:
It's because guys can't be raped.
Under more modern, liberal definitions they absolutely can.
Posted on 12/6/17 at 2:54 pm to rocket31
quote:
Probably because if you have years. Years. To file complaints against someone it makes you complicit in the actions
How do people STILL not grasp this? Someone who has been the victim of something egregious like sexual assault or severe sexual harassment is often reluctant to raise the accusations for a few reasons. One being that people like you will inevitably say they're lying no matter when they come forward. That is magnified when the alleged transgressor is a person in a position of power with armies of people who will defend that person and attempt to smear the accuser. Secondly, they in many cases are forced to replay an event that was or may have been highly traumatic. The backlash surrounding women and in some cases men coming forward recently illustrates exactly why people often take a long time to come forward. Obviously I'm speaking in generalities here but I think what I've outlined applies in many, many cases.
This post was edited on 12/6/17 at 2:55 pm
Posted on 12/6/17 at 2:54 pm to The Boat
quote:No, it's because it took down some of the most powerful/popular people in Hollywood.
The reason this is person of the year is because of the wide expanse of it and how it took over social media. It took over social media because the majority of those posting it were lying or making stuff up.
If #metoo went batshit crazy on Twitter like it did but not one Hollywood type was outed, you think it's still winning Person of the Year?
Posted on 12/6/17 at 2:55 pm to OweO
quote:
There is the "why now"? I know times have changed and there were things that were accepted 30 years ago that are not accepted today... So there is a bit of a gray area.
Molesting women was never acceptable. Women just had no where to go with their complaint.
Posted on 12/6/17 at 2:56 pm to lsu2006
quote:He thinks they all knew what they were getting into, so you gotta understand the absurd place he's coming from...or basically just not take anything he says seriously and just mock him, that's worth more of your time.
How do people STILL not grasp this?
Posted on 12/6/17 at 3:00 pm to lsu2006
quote:
How do people STILL not grasp this?
i grasp it 100%
youre taking one side of the argument and dismissing the other, then attempting to mock me because i bring it to attention
Posted on 12/6/17 at 3:00 pm to TH03
quote:
It's because guys can't be raped. You should know this.
Wasn't there a John Grisham novel/movie about this scenario? Where a man was raped (or just sexually assaulted maybe?) by a higher-up woman?
Posted on 12/6/17 at 3:06 pm to rocket31
quote:
i grasp it 100%
That's good. Do you disagree with anything I said?
quote:
youre taking one side of the argument and dismissing the othe
The argument being that if they don't come forward soon enough they're "complicit"? Or is there another argument I'm missing? That's argument is pretty easy to dismiss. They're under no requirement to come forward in a time frame that suits you or anyone else and it's asinine to assume they're full of shite for not coming forward in a "timely" manner. If I'm misconstruing the "other" argument let me know. I don't want to "mock" you.
Posted on 12/6/17 at 3:08 pm to rocket31
I'm not reading through this, but why are we discussing a magazine so stupid that it awards "person of the year" to a concept?
That alone makes me ignore what they say and tells me they've got an agenda. Name a person as "person of the year" and we can talk again.
Next year's Time "person of the year"? The color fuchsia.
That alone makes me ignore what they say and tells me they've got an agenda. Name a person as "person of the year" and we can talk again.
Next year's Time "person of the year"? The color fuchsia.
This post was edited on 12/6/17 at 3:11 pm
Posted on 12/6/17 at 3:09 pm to lsu2006
the argument that there is a chance which exists that these women used their sexuality to advance their careers.
as evidenced by this thread, its something that cant even be discussed rationally.
anyways, im out.
as evidenced by this thread, its something that cant even be discussed rationally.
anyways, im out.
Posted on 12/6/17 at 3:11 pm to TigerstuckinMS
quote:What concept?
'm not reading through this, but why are we discussing a magazine so stupid that it awards "person of the year" to a concept?
You do realize actual people broke the silence, right?
Posted on 12/6/17 at 3:12 pm to shel311
quote:
You do realize actual people broke the silence, right?
That's not a person!
Posted on 12/6/17 at 3:16 pm to rocket31
quote:
the argument that there is a chance which exists that these women used their sexuality to advance their careers.
as evidenced by this thread, its something that cant even be discussed rationally.
anyways, im out.
Sorry dude I didn't read through every single page of the thread, that's why I asked if I missed another argument. So sensitive. Yeesh.
Posted on 12/6/17 at 3:17 pm to TigerstuckinMS
quote:
actual people
quote:
That's not a person!
Nailed it
Posted on 12/6/17 at 3:18 pm to lsu2006
quote:
Nailed it
I wasn't even trying!
Posted on 12/6/17 at 3:20 pm to TigerstuckinMS
quote:It's also not a concept.
That's not a person!
Posted on 12/6/17 at 3:28 pm to lsu2006
quote:
The argument being that if they don't come forward soon enough they're "complicit"? Or is there another argument I'm missing? That's argument is pretty easy to dismiss.
Are you claiming that some women don't use it to their advantage? It doesn't dismiss the original predictor but in Hollywood the casting couch is a long accepted concept
Popular
Back to top


0







