Started By
Message

re: Time Names #MeToo Silence Breakers As "Person of the Year"

Posted on 12/6/17 at 2:53 pm to
Posted by rocket31
Member since Jan 2008
41888 posts
Posted on 12/6/17 at 2:53 pm to
quote:

You've basically argued that if you're, say, a Victoria's Secret model you can't be sexually harassed or assaulted, so there's that.


no i didnt

youre disgusting for assuming so
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299716 posts
Posted on 12/6/17 at 2:54 pm to
quote:

It's because guys can't be raped.


Under more modern, liberal definitions they absolutely can.
Posted by lsu2006
BR
Member since Feb 2004
40155 posts
Posted on 12/6/17 at 2:54 pm to
quote:

Probably because if you have years. Years. To file complaints against someone it makes you complicit in the actions


How do people STILL not grasp this? Someone who has been the victim of something egregious like sexual assault or severe sexual harassment is often reluctant to raise the accusations for a few reasons. One being that people like you will inevitably say they're lying no matter when they come forward. That is magnified when the alleged transgressor is a person in a position of power with armies of people who will defend that person and attempt to smear the accuser. Secondly, they in many cases are forced to replay an event that was or may have been highly traumatic. The backlash surrounding women and in some cases men coming forward recently illustrates exactly why people often take a long time to come forward. Obviously I'm speaking in generalities here but I think what I've outlined applies in many, many cases.
This post was edited on 12/6/17 at 2:55 pm
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112946 posts
Posted on 12/6/17 at 2:54 pm to
quote:

The reason this is person of the year is because of the wide expanse of it and how it took over social media. It took over social media because the majority of those posting it were lying or making stuff up.
No, it's because it took down some of the most powerful/popular people in Hollywood.

If #metoo went batshit crazy on Twitter like it did but not one Hollywood type was outed, you think it's still winning Person of the Year?
Posted by ianfson1
Houston
Member since Aug 2009
1172 posts
Posted on 12/6/17 at 2:55 pm to
quote:

There is the "why now"? I know times have changed and there were things that were accepted 30 years ago that are not accepted today... So there is a bit of a gray area.


Molesting women was never acceptable. Women just had no where to go with their complaint.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112946 posts
Posted on 12/6/17 at 2:56 pm to
quote:

How do people STILL not grasp this?
He thinks they all knew what they were getting into, so you gotta understand the absurd place he's coming from...or basically just not take anything he says seriously and just mock him, that's worth more of your time.
Posted by rocket31
Member since Jan 2008
41888 posts
Posted on 12/6/17 at 3:00 pm to
quote:

How do people STILL not grasp this?


i grasp it 100%

youre taking one side of the argument and dismissing the other, then attempting to mock me because i bring it to attention

Posted by LSUBoo
Knoxville, TN
Member since Mar 2006
104484 posts
Posted on 12/6/17 at 3:00 pm to
quote:

It's because guys can't be raped. You should know this.


Wasn't there a John Grisham novel/movie about this scenario? Where a man was raped (or just sexually assaulted maybe?) by a higher-up woman?
Posted by lsu2006
BR
Member since Feb 2004
40155 posts
Posted on 12/6/17 at 3:06 pm to
quote:

i grasp it 100%


That's good. Do you disagree with anything I said?
quote:

youre taking one side of the argument and dismissing the othe

The argument being that if they don't come forward soon enough they're "complicit"? Or is there another argument I'm missing? That's argument is pretty easy to dismiss. They're under no requirement to come forward in a time frame that suits you or anyone else and it's asinine to assume they're full of shite for not coming forward in a "timely" manner. If I'm misconstruing the "other" argument let me know. I don't want to "mock" you.
Posted by TigerstuckinMS
Member since Nov 2005
33687 posts
Posted on 12/6/17 at 3:08 pm to
I'm not reading through this, but why are we discussing a magazine so stupid that it awards "person of the year" to a concept?

That alone makes me ignore what they say and tells me they've got an agenda. Name a person as "person of the year" and we can talk again.

Next year's Time "person of the year"? The color fuchsia.
This post was edited on 12/6/17 at 3:11 pm
Posted by rocket31
Member since Jan 2008
41888 posts
Posted on 12/6/17 at 3:09 pm to
the argument that there is a chance which exists that these women used their sexuality to advance their careers.

as evidenced by this thread, its something that cant even be discussed rationally.

anyways, im out.



Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112946 posts
Posted on 12/6/17 at 3:11 pm to
quote:

'm not reading through this, but why are we discussing a magazine so stupid that it awards "person of the year" to a concept?
What concept?

You do realize actual people broke the silence, right?
Posted by TigerstuckinMS
Member since Nov 2005
33687 posts
Posted on 12/6/17 at 3:12 pm to
quote:


You do realize actual people broke the silence, right?

That's not a person!
Posted by Placebeaux
Bobby Fischer Fan Club President
Member since Jun 2008
51852 posts
Posted on 12/6/17 at 3:15 pm to
Posted by lsu2006
BR
Member since Feb 2004
40155 posts
Posted on 12/6/17 at 3:16 pm to
quote:

the argument that there is a chance which exists that these women used their sexuality to advance their careers.

as evidenced by this thread, its something that cant even be discussed rationally.

anyways, im out.



Sorry dude I didn't read through every single page of the thread, that's why I asked if I missed another argument. So sensitive. Yeesh.
Posted by lsu2006
BR
Member since Feb 2004
40155 posts
Posted on 12/6/17 at 3:17 pm to
quote:

actual people

quote:

That's not a person!

Nailed it
Posted by TigerstuckinMS
Member since Nov 2005
33687 posts
Posted on 12/6/17 at 3:18 pm to
quote:

Nailed it

I wasn't even trying!
Posted by CAD703X
Liberty Island
Member since Jul 2008
94740 posts
Posted on 12/6/17 at 3:19 pm to

Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112946 posts
Posted on 12/6/17 at 3:20 pm to
quote:

That's not a person!
It's also not a concept.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299716 posts
Posted on 12/6/17 at 3:28 pm to
quote:

The argument being that if they don't come forward soon enough they're "complicit"? Or is there another argument I'm missing? That's argument is pretty easy to dismiss.


Are you claiming that some women don't use it to their advantage? It doesn't dismiss the original predictor but in Hollywood the casting couch is a long accepted concept
Jump to page
Page First 7 8 9 10
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 9 of 10Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram