- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

TIL: the Spanish Flu started in Kansas
Posted on 4/2/20 at 9:43 am
Posted on 4/2/20 at 9:43 am
It's called the Spanish Flu because Spain was the first to be truthful about it with the media.
Most likely started at an army base and it's true nature and extent was covered up by the military.
Most likely started at an army base and it's true nature and extent was covered up by the military.
Posted on 4/2/20 at 9:44 am to magildachunks
We know
It's been a there for a while
Posted on 4/2/20 at 9:45 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
We know
I didn't
Posted on 4/2/20 at 9:45 am to magildachunks
"...because it started in
"
"Posted on 4/2/20 at 9:45 am to magildachunks
Yes and the Chinese flu started in CHI NA!
Posted on 4/2/20 at 9:45 am to magildachunks
Thats the mainstream story, some stories out tying it to far east recently
Posted on 4/2/20 at 9:46 am to magildachunks
Yep. Since this coronavirus deal started, I've done a lot of reading about history's major pandemics. Really fascinating stuff. The Black Death is worth exploring, too.
Posted on 4/2/20 at 9:46 am to magildachunks
quote:
TIL: the Spanish Flu started in Kansas
This is somewhat of an urban myth, because we don't know for sure.
There are 3 prevailing theories:
1) Kansas
2) France
3) North China
Kansas has been the theory for a long time but there is a ton of doubt cast on it and we will never know which one of the three prevailing theories is true.
Posted on 4/2/20 at 9:47 am to magildachunks
quote:
Most likely started at an army base and it's true nature and extent was covered up by the military.
Did they have a bio weapons research group in Kansas during WWI?
Posted on 4/2/20 at 9:49 am to magildachunks
Yes, but who first settled Kansas ? That’s right- the native Americans. And where did the native Americans come from? Asia, of course . So, the answer is still frick CHINA.
Posted on 4/2/20 at 9:49 am to magildachunks
(no message)
This post was edited on 4/2/20 at 2:14 pm
Posted on 4/2/20 at 9:52 am to MarkFromBuffalo
quote:
Don't believe it. These are anti-White, America-hating liberals on Twitter that are pushing this conspiracy
That's pretty naive. We don't know where it started. There is plenty of evidence to argue that it started in Kansas.
Posted on 4/2/20 at 9:55 am to El Mattadorr
i don't know one way or the other.
i'm just trying to picture what Kansas was like back in 1918 and imagining some secret advanced biochemical warfare lab hidden under a cow pasture in rural Kansas.
i'm just trying to picture what Kansas was like back in 1918 and imagining some secret advanced biochemical warfare lab hidden under a cow pasture in rural Kansas.
Posted on 4/2/20 at 9:56 am to Fun Bunch
quote:
There are 3 prevailing theories:
1) Kansas
2) France
3) North China
There's a theory that ties all this together:
The British and French used contract labor from China to dig trenches and perform other work to free up soldiers for combat duty. They brought it with them. It spread to soldiers, including the American advance party, who returned to the US, bringing it with them. It found the perfect environment in the American training camps. These soldiers reinfected Europe in the main, second wave.
Posted on 4/2/20 at 10:24 am to Fun Bunch
My money is on France. The world of trenches and conditions on the battlefield made for almost perfect breeding grounds.
Popular
Back to top

11












