Started By
Message

re: They could stop 75% of these riots by disabling cellphones on the scene

Posted on 6/2/20 at 10:21 am to
Posted by southernelite
Houston, TX
Member since Sep 2009
53568 posts
Posted on 6/2/20 at 10:21 am to
quote:


Peaceful protesting obviously should be allowed to continue without interference.



The only problem is the people in charge have terrible judgement to distinguish the two. If you give them the green light, they will abuse it.
Posted by NYNolaguy1
Member since May 2011
21849 posts
Posted on 6/2/20 at 10:21 am to
Removing habeas corpus and first amendment rights works too.
Posted by TH03
Mogadishu
Member since Dec 2008
172004 posts
Posted on 6/2/20 at 10:21 am to
Movie theaters aren’t the government.
Posted by tigerinexile
The greatest parish
Member since Sep 2004
1702 posts
Posted on 6/2/20 at 10:22 am to
The government is probably paying for a large portion of the phones so they should be able to stop service on them at will.
Posted by Tempratt
Member since Oct 2013
15341 posts
Posted on 6/2/20 at 10:22 am to
quote:

it's pretty scary that we are willing to give the government the power to shut down civilian communication in an area.


FCC can do whatever the frick they want.
Posted by TH03
Mogadishu
Member since Dec 2008
172004 posts
Posted on 6/2/20 at 10:22 am to
They aren’t anymore. That’s why you pay full price now.
Posted by Tigers4Lyfe
Member since Nov 2010
6818 posts
Posted on 6/2/20 at 10:22 am to
quote:

I would like the powerful water cannons shot directly into the air over the protesters to act like heavy rain is a more practical measure though.
Are you saying this is going to shut down phones? Please tell me this is not what you are implying.
This post was edited on 6/2/20 at 10:23 am
Posted by TheCaterpillar
Member since Jan 2004
76774 posts
Posted on 6/2/20 at 10:23 am to
quote:

Movie theaters aren’t the government.



FAA does it.

Stopping people from using their phones in very specific areas isn't a 1A infringement.
Posted by TheCaterpillar
Member since Jan 2004
76774 posts
Posted on 6/2/20 at 10:24 am to
quote:

Are you saying this is going to shut down phones? Please tell me this is not what you are implying.



Rain in DC the other night dramatically reduced the riots and cell phone videos surfacing.

Do you think heavy water coming down from the sky won't stop people from pulling out their $1,000 cell phones?

Posted by CAD703X
Liberty Island
Member since Jul 2008
94749 posts
Posted on 6/2/20 at 10:24 am to
doesnt apple turn off the camera inside concert venues?

seems like something like that might be useful.
Posted by Tigers4Lyfe
Member since Nov 2010
6818 posts
Posted on 6/2/20 at 10:26 am to
quote:

Do you think heavy water coming down from the sky won't stop people from pulling out their $1,000 cell phones?
In that situation, no I don't. And once this becomes the norm then people will put them phone protectors on their phones like they do in waterparks. This idea of yours is comical.
Posted by NYNolaguy1
Member since May 2011
21849 posts
Posted on 6/2/20 at 10:26 am to
quote:

FCC can do whatever the frick they want.


Is this small govt at work?
Posted by St Augustine
The Pauper of the Surf
Member since Mar 2006
72492 posts
Posted on 6/2/20 at 10:27 am to
quote:

it's pretty scary that we are willing to give the government the power to shut down civilian communication in an area.


I mean at some point people violently rioting don’t get to violently riot unchecked. Personally I like the water cannon idea, but point it at the rioters.
This post was edited on 6/2/20 at 10:29 am
Posted by HT713
Galations 4:16
Member since Jan 2011
10028 posts
Posted on 6/2/20 at 10:28 am to
quote:

I would like the powerful water cannons shot directly into the air over the protesters to act like heavy rain


quote:

Are you saying this is going to shut down phones?


lmao this interaction is great. the dumbest people in the world use this website.
Posted by stout
Porte du Lafitte
Member since Sep 2006
184716 posts
Posted on 6/2/20 at 10:29 am to
quote:

Not very supportive of 1A huh?



That wouldn't be limiting their right to free speech. Using a cell phone service is not a constitutional right.
Posted by BluegrassBelle
RIP Hefty Lefty - 1981-2019
Member since Nov 2010
109033 posts
Posted on 6/2/20 at 10:29 am to
quote:

Maybe a concentrated EMP?


They've been protesting in our downtown area with multiple major corporations in the area (i.e. Humana) as well as multiple major hospitals that service the state as well as Metro Corrections and the Courthouse.

That would be a disaster.
Posted by Tigers4Lyfe
Member since Nov 2010
6818 posts
Posted on 6/2/20 at 10:29 am to
quote:

I mean at some point people violently rioting don’t get to violently riot unchecked. Personally I like the water cannon idea, but point it at the rioters.
Exactly, freedom has its limits. The water canon idea? Laughable.
Posted by NYNolaguy1
Member since May 2011
21849 posts
Posted on 6/2/20 at 10:36 am to
quote:

That wouldn't be limiting their right to free speech. Using a cell phone service is not a constitutional right.


Neither is using Google or YouTube or Facebook, amirite?
Posted by stout
Porte du Lafitte
Member since Sep 2006
184716 posts
Posted on 6/2/20 at 10:38 am to
quote:

Neither is using Google or YouTube or Facebook, amirite?




No but they have laws that define if they are a platform or a publisher. The issue is when they cross those laws and become a publisher but you know this.
Posted by NYNolaguy1
Member since May 2011
21849 posts
Posted on 6/2/20 at 10:40 am to
quote:

No but they have laws that define if they are a platform or a publisher. The issue is when they cross those laws and become a publisher but you know this.


Of course I do. My point is the slope gets extremely slippery when you say it's ok to start ignoring some rights for the greater good.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram