Started By
Message

re: The gloves are off regarding St. George...

Posted on 1/12/14 at 7:50 pm to
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
135350 posts
Posted on 1/12/14 at 7:50 pm to
Shenandoah Elementary is an A rated school.
Posted by LSUWrangler
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2013
365 posts
Posted on 1/12/14 at 7:50 pm to
quote:

Shenandoah area, checking in bro.




If nothing comes out this, at least the people of unincorporated EBR parish now realize their tax money is propping up city services that they do not have the benefit of using. BRPD, BRFD both whining about losing money and talking about how good of a city BR is, yet the BRPD chief and the Union Presidents of both agencies live outside of Baton Rouge. Chief- Prairieville, BRPD Union - Denham Springs, BRFD Union - Central. Come to think of it, the BRFD fire chief lives in either baker or zachary. Do you blame them?
Posted by LSUWrangler
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2013
365 posts
Posted on 1/12/14 at 7:51 pm to
quote:

And then what? There still will be no new school district


That comes once the city incorporates.
Posted by johnnyrocket
Ghetto once known as Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2013
9790 posts
Posted on 1/12/14 at 7:52 pm to
Then he really does not have skin in the game!

I have property in both the city Red Oaks and Eastside fire district. Only one gets Homestead exemption, so I will get hard with taxes either way.

Presenlty, I am registered to vote in the Eastside fire district.

Just rather try something than sit by and do nothing.

Will it hurt in the beginning, yes.
At the end of the day I believe both areas will benefit. Baton Rouge will have to tighten its budget running more efficiently. St George will have a change to keep the middle class families in the Parish.

This post was edited on 1/12/14 at 7:56 pm
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
135350 posts
Posted on 1/12/14 at 7:52 pm to
quote:

That means there is a slim to none chance you live in the proposed St George District.

There is zero chance I live in SG, just as I've previously posted.
Posted by LSUWrangler
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2013
365 posts
Posted on 1/12/14 at 7:53 pm to
quote:

That means there is a slim to none chance you live in the proposed St George District.


If you live south of Florida and either East Side of St. George is your Fire Dept (and EBRSO is law enforcement), then you are in.
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
135350 posts
Posted on 1/12/14 at 7:55 pm to
quote:

That comes once the city incorporates.

Oh, okay. Is that in spite of Bodi White saying the 2/3 votes in the legislature aren't there? And probably won't be?
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
135350 posts
Posted on 1/12/14 at 7:57 pm to
quote:

Then he really does not have skin in the game!

Oh, yes, I do!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by LSUWrangler
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2013
365 posts
Posted on 1/12/14 at 7:57 pm to
quote:

Oh, okay. Is that in spite of Bodi White saying the 2/3 votes in the legislature aren't there? And probably won't be?


Im no authority on the subject, but the Legislature's reasoning for axing the two prior attempts to create an independent school district were because, and I quote, "Central, Baker and Zachary were able to do so because they all incorporated, which is what would have to be done"
Posted by AutoYes_Clown
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Oct 2012
5379 posts
Posted on 1/12/14 at 7:58 pm to
I need a list of OTers for and OTers against St George
Posted by sec13rowBBseat28
St George, LA
Member since Aug 2006
15803 posts
Posted on 1/12/14 at 7:58 pm to
quote:

SG can afford a city. But it will take tax increases to do it. Their leaders are denying that it will.


Can you show me one quote where they have said that taxes WILL NOT go up?
Posted by TH3 LSU TIG3R
Member since Dec 2012
693 posts
Posted on 1/12/14 at 8:01 pm to
When all they can play is the race card, they truly have no argument at all
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
135350 posts
Posted on 1/12/14 at 8:01 pm to
The official SG website answers a FAQ that no new taxes are expected.
Posted by AutoYes_Clown
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Oct 2012
5379 posts
Posted on 1/12/14 at 8:03 pm to
Q: Will my taxes go up if we incorporate?
A: Taxes shouldn’t have to be raised to support a new city.

Currently, residents in the proposed area pay 11 mills less a year than residents in Baton Rouge. Sales tax revenue will be the lion’s share of the revenue for new city. Currently the proposed area generates approximately $65 million a year in sales tax revenue alone.
Posted by johnnyrocket
Ghetto once known as Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2013
9790 posts
Posted on 1/12/14 at 8:06 pm to
It will be hard for the legislature not to pass it for other districts and not St George.

Right now it is a pissing contest of assumptions from a guy that does not even have a chance to vote for it.

Guess what I can lose 25lbs tonight and nail a supermodel. It probably won't happen, but we can all assume since heck is freezing over if ST George becomes a city according to people that do not live in the area.
This post was edited on 1/12/14 at 8:11 pm
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
135350 posts
Posted on 1/12/14 at 8:08 pm to
Bodi White was quoted in the paper two weeks ago that even if SG incorporates he does not think the 2/3 votes are there to put the new district proposal to a statewide vote for a constitutional amendment like Central, Zachary & Baker had to get passed.

He also said the SG organizers are exploring if it can be done without a constitutional amendment.

An experienced La constitutional lawyer was quoted in the same article saying the La constitution has to be amended to create and fund a new school district.

That's all I know about that.
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
135350 posts
Posted on 1/12/14 at 8:11 pm to
quote:

Currently the proposed area generates approximately $65 million a year in sales tax revenue alone.
That is with the Bluebonnet retail district included in SG, including the Mall of La.

It won't be.
Posted by sec13rowBBseat28
St George, LA
Member since Aug 2006
15803 posts
Posted on 1/12/14 at 8:11 pm to
This is their quote:

quote:

A: Taxes shouldn’t have to be raised to support a new city.

Currently, residents in the proposed area pay 11 mills less a year than residents in Baton Rouge. Sales tax revenue will be the lion’s share of the revenue for new city. Currently the proposed area generates approximately $65 million a year in sales tax revenue alone.



Stop saying the SG leaders are lying because they are claiming taxes WILL NOT go up. You are the one lying.
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
135350 posts
Posted on 1/12/14 at 8:14 pm to
quote:

Taxes shouldn’t have to be raised to support a new city.

A lie. It's the same lie the organizers of Central told their citizens. After the incorporation of Central taxes were raised.

This has been covered no less than 4 times already in this thread. From now on I will ignore any posts which ignore what has already been posted in this thread.
Posted by LSUWrangler
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2013
365 posts
Posted on 1/12/14 at 8:14 pm to
quote:

Stop saying the SG leaders are lying because they are claiming taxes WILL NOT go up. You are the one lying.


Ill pay higher taxes for a good school system (IE Central) as opposed to nearly the same tax + private school tuition so my kid doesn't get knifed.
Jump to page
Page First 24 25 26 27 28 ... 34
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 26 of 34Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram