- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Teen Rapes Girl. Judge to Rapist: No time in jail, but no more sex
Posted on 2/6/17 at 8:45 pm to LSUTANGERINE
Posted on 2/6/17 at 8:45 pm to LSUTANGERINE
The judge probably has no daughters, or common sense
0
Posted on 2/6/17 at 8:47 pm to Vino24
quote:
Why haven't you brought up mitigating factors the judge may have had in mind? Such as them being in a relationship (however inappropriate that may be)
You mean someone who is an adult in a relationship with someone the age of a middle school eighth-grader? Or the one about him having pictures of underage girls taken on his phone without their knowledge? Or the one where he ladmittedly fantasizes about raping a 13-year-older.
This is not just some trailer park relationship. The guy is a pervert in the truest sense and a sexual predator. He will make the news again at some point .
This post was edited on 2/6/17 at 9:00 pm
Posted on 2/6/17 at 8:47 pm to LSUTANGERINE
Judge sounds like a liberal.
Posted on 2/6/17 at 8:49 pm to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
but he suspended the sentence for a one-year "rider program," for the rape of a 14-year-old girl.
Sounds like this guy already did a rider program.
Posted on 2/6/17 at 8:49 pm to Will Cover
quote:
White privilege is alive and well in Idaho.
I'm pretty sure it's just called being an Idahoian in Idaho.
Posted on 2/6/17 at 8:59 pm to 3nOut
It's not that anyone is saying that the judge wasn't too lenient, it's just that Tangerine is cherry picking a case, leaving out mitigating details, and whipping up outrage so that some other poster, WillCover in this instance, will spout some SJW tripe about white privilege.
For starters, there aren't too many non-whites in Idaho. For all we know, this dude is the Idahoan epitome of underprivileged.
Secondly, the judge might very well be the most liberal progressive douche of a judge on the bench and he looks for ways to avoid sentencing statutory rape cases as sex offenders all the time.
Thirdly, statutory rape cases getting reduced to an end result of no jail time and no sex offender registration is not uncommon, even with non-white offenders.
For starters, there aren't too many non-whites in Idaho. For all we know, this dude is the Idahoan epitome of underprivileged.
Secondly, the judge might very well be the most liberal progressive douche of a judge on the bench and he looks for ways to avoid sentencing statutory rape cases as sex offenders all the time.
Thirdly, statutory rape cases getting reduced to an end result of no jail time and no sex offender registration is not uncommon, even with non-white offenders.
Posted on 2/6/17 at 9:03 pm to geauxtigers456
quote:
Dude, the girl was fricking 14. It does not matter as she cannot give consent
Big cats can scratch you, but a little pussy never hurt anyone.
Posted on 2/6/17 at 9:03 pm to Jimbeaux
quote:
It's not that anyone is saying that the judge wasn't too lenient,
Maybe maybe not. But some people, specifically you, are making excuses and rationalizing.
quote:
For starters, there aren't too many non-whites in Idaho. For all we know, this dude is the Idahoan epitome of underprivileged. Secondly, the judge might very well be the most liberal progressive douche of a judge on the bench and he looks for ways to avoid sentencing statutory rape cases as sex offenders all the time. Thirdly, statutory rape cases getting reduced to an end result of no jail time and no sex offender registration is not uncommon, even with non-white offenders.
And who is cherry picking now.? You again left out the part about him taking pictures of under age girls without their knowledge as well as his admitted fantasies about raping a 13-year-old . I posted the first two or three paragraphs of the article and linked the rest. That is not cherry picking. That is generally how an article should be posted here .
And I did not comment about race at all in this thread. Unfortunately, that was you
This post was edited on 2/6/17 at 9:07 pm
Posted on 2/6/17 at 9:07 pm to geauxtigers456
quote:
Dude, the girl was fricking 14. It does not matter as she cannot give consent
In MS a 14 year old can give consent depending on the age of the male lol. If the male is 36 months or less older than the female, then it's perfectly fine.
Edit: Oh, and if the child is under 14, it's perfectly fine if the older participant is within 24 months of the child.
This post was edited on 2/6/17 at 9:10 pm
Posted on 2/6/17 at 9:09 pm to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
Teen Rapes Girl
quote:
for the rape of a 14-year-old girl.
so wait
is this rape rape or age "rape"?
Posted on 2/6/17 at 9:09 pm to geauxtigers456
quote:
Dude, the girl was fricking 14. It does not matter as she cannot give consent
it matters a great deal in how he should be sentenced
Posted on 2/6/17 at 9:11 pm to SlowFlowPro
It matters, even though some dispute that in this thread.
We can recognize statutory rape as awful while still recognizing that there is a gulf between forcible, violent rape and some piece of shite coercing a young teen into bed.
We can recognize statutory rape as awful while still recognizing that there is a gulf between forcible, violent rape and some piece of shite coercing a young teen into bed.
Posted on 2/6/17 at 9:12 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
is this rape rape or age "rape"?
What really matters. I don't have a problem with this sentence if it was consensual sex and daddy got mad so he pressed charges. If he actually raped the girl then this is fricked up. Plus he has 15 years hanging over his head. In MS, if he were to commit any new felony (or violate the terms of his supervised period), even on year 14 day 364, then he can be sentenced to the full 15 years, with no credit for the time gone by, with out any trial. It's a 15 minute hearing.
Posted on 2/6/17 at 9:13 pm to Pettifogger
well it's also a sliding scale of legal fiction
if 14 year olds "can't consent", then fine. arrest and prosecute all 14 year olds who have sex. when we create these wishy-washy legal fictions and then add all these other ones on top, it just gets too complicated to be rational
we need to have a real discussion about these issues and not use terms like "rape" or concepts like "consent" b/c it just muddies the water to get the exact responses we saw in this thread. same with child porn charges in the age of selfies and cell phones
if 14 year olds "can't consent", then fine. arrest and prosecute all 14 year olds who have sex. when we create these wishy-washy legal fictions and then add all these other ones on top, it just gets too complicated to be rational
we need to have a real discussion about these issues and not use terms like "rape" or concepts like "consent" b/c it just muddies the water to get the exact responses we saw in this thread. same with child porn charges in the age of selfies and cell phones
Posted on 2/6/17 at 9:15 pm to geauxtigers456
quote:
Dude, the girl was fricking 14. It does not matter as she cannot give consent
Wasn't that the age of Jeremy Hills "victim?"
Posted on 2/6/17 at 9:16 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Wasn't that the age of Jeremy Hills "victim?"
Sorry but I loled
Posted on 2/6/17 at 9:19 pm to Will Cover
They need to admonish that judge
Posted on 2/6/17 at 9:19 pm to TigernMS12
quote:
Wasn't that the age of Jeremy Hills "victim?"
Sorry but I loled
Yeah, there was a lot of people taking up for Hill. This is a similar case, I think this dude was only a year older than Hill.
His other "victim" was 17 which is off limits in Idaho, I suppose.
Posted on 2/6/17 at 9:23 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
His other "victim" was 17 which is off limits in Idaho, I suppose.
This is bad. Where I'm from 16 is fair game from the HS QB to the old geezer down the street. Only exception is positions of trust.
Posted on 2/6/17 at 9:27 pm to Jimbeaux
Will Cover and Tangerine are a match made in heaven
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News