Started By
Message

re: Teacher who had phone stolen and nudes stolen may face criminal charges

Posted on 3/2/16 at 2:04 pm to
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112637 posts
Posted on 3/2/16 at 2:04 pm to
quote:

The phone is still private property, is it not?
Yes

quote:

If you disagree, the analogy went WAY over your head.
How so? It's not illegal or possibly breaking a policy to have these things at home, so his analogy doesn't work, how could it possibly work when that's the actual crux of the debate and he's leaving the main piece out in his analogy?
Posted by AwesomeSauce
Das Boot
Member since May 2015
11173 posts
Posted on 3/2/16 at 2:05 pm to
quote:

shel311 on 3/1/16 at 3:17 pm to AwesomeSauce


Ok, then where does it stop? If the boy is 16 then let's require her to register as a sex offender.
quote:

Or we can just give her the death penalty!!!



Pardon my bad copy/paste. I took your sarcasm (I hope) as disqualifying my statement.
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
51036 posts
Posted on 3/2/16 at 2:07 pm to
quote:

How so? It's not illegal or possibly breaking a policy to have these things at home, so his analogy doesn't work, how could it possibly work when that's the actual crux of the debate and he's leaving the main piece out in his analogy?


Dude, if you're over 18, having naked pictures of yourself is not illegal, period. Just because she was at her place of employment does not change that.

The analogy works much better than the shitty ones you keep presenting.
Posted by bigpetedatiga
Alexandria, LA
Member since Aug 2009
8747 posts
Posted on 3/2/16 at 2:08 pm to
quote:

Yep. It's never the childs fault.


quote:

As a husband of a high school teacher- THIS.


As a high school teacher - This

It is never the kids fault anymore. This shite burns you out.
Posted by Chicken
Jackassistan
Member since Aug 2003
26925 posts
Posted on 3/2/16 at 2:08 pm to
quote:

So you think it's ok for her to leave her phone where a kid could get to it?????
yes...that is private property...consider it like trespassing.

Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112637 posts
Posted on 3/2/16 at 2:08 pm to
All good.

I'm not advocating a criminal case against her. I also dont think I ever argued an exact punishment.

My main, and really only premise is that she is responsible for nudies of herself on her phone that is not password protected.

I just don't think it's a wipe your hands completely clean/get off free for having pornographic material of yourself that is that easily accessible to minors just because of the way it was accessed(possibly illegally).
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112637 posts
Posted on 3/2/16 at 2:10 pm to
quote:

Dude, if you're over 18, having naked pictures of yourself is not illegal, period
I'm well aware.

quote:

Just because she was at her place of employment does not change that.
Oh, so she could have all the nudes of herself on her phone, polaroids, anything she wants at her place of employment where minors are? Is that your take, while calling my takes "shitty"? That doesn't make much sense, fwiw.

Posted by KG6
Member since Aug 2009
10920 posts
Posted on 3/2/16 at 2:12 pm to
From a legal standpoint, I don't see how one can hold her responsible at all. From a school wanting to fire her, different story.
Posted by bigpetedatiga
Alexandria, LA
Member since Aug 2009
8747 posts
Posted on 3/2/16 at 2:13 pm to
quote:

This is an odd situation. I can't believe she is being witchhunted like this...I hope the kid who did this is sued, as well as the school district that canned her.



I showed my AD this story, he is a former principal of a 5A school. I asked him how he would have handle it.

He said not too long ago you could have just kicked the kid out of school and let the teacher go after the kid and family for damages. Now, he said he would probably just sent it up to his Superintendent and let him have the final word. He said the world is just to PC now. Can't say I disagree with him sadly.

He also stated that under certain conditions they could have searched bags or lockers but trying to go through a kid's phone would have put you in a world of trouble. This is still true, yet somehow the teacher is not protected.


Posted by BluegrassBelle
RIP Hefty Lefty - 1981-2019
Member since Nov 2010
106265 posts
Posted on 3/2/16 at 2:13 pm to
quote:

I just don't think it's a wipe your hands completely clean/get off free for having pornographic material of yourself that is that easily accessible to minors just because of the way it was accessed(possibly illegally).


Easy access = nude photos laying out on a desk that can just be picked up in plain view

Easy access =\= actually having to access menus in someone's phone that you took from their possession in order to access said nudes
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
51036 posts
Posted on 3/2/16 at 2:16 pm to
quote:

Oh, so she could have all the nudes of herself on her phone, polaroids, anything she wants at her place of employment where minors are? Is that your take, while calling my takes "shitty"? That doesn't make much sense, fwiw.


Jesus you really have no clue what I'm actually talking about do you?

I've not once mentioned whether she should be held accountable for having the pictures. I've only said that she should not be charged criminally seeing as she hasn't broken any law.

The only thing that doesn't make sense is you talking about shite that I've never mentioned.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112637 posts
Posted on 3/2/16 at 2:16 pm to
quote:

Easy access = nude photos laying out on a desk that can just be picked up in plain view Easy access =\= actually having to access menus in someone's phone that you took from their possession in order to access said nudes
Disagree, i'd argue he very easily accessed them.

Coulda been done in as little as 2 clicks. Theoretically easier and quicker than if the pictures were in a folder within a pile of papers, fwiw.

If he had to bypass phone locks and passwords, i'd agree. But an unlocked phone w/pics on a camera roll? I'm not buying that that was hard to access, at all.
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
51036 posts
Posted on 3/2/16 at 2:17 pm to
quote:

From a legal standpoint, I don't see how one can hold her responsible at all. From a school wanting to fire her, different story.


I've only commented on the former. That's what the poster who keeps arguing with me doesn't seem to grasp.
Posted by BluegrassBelle
RIP Hefty Lefty - 1981-2019
Member since Nov 2010
106265 posts
Posted on 3/2/16 at 2:18 pm to
quote:

Disagree, i'd argue he very easily accessed them.


He had to steal her property to access them. I don't care whether she had a passcode or not. Just because a student knows how to access menus in a phone doesn't make it legally accessible.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112637 posts
Posted on 3/2/16 at 2:23 pm to
quote:

Just because a student knows how to access menus in a phone doesn't make it legally accessible.
Easily accessible doesn't mean legally accessible.

FWIW, the post of mine you quoted was a continued conversation with me and AwesomeSauce from the other thread that was solely about whether she bears SOME responsibility, not necessarily whether her role was actually legal/illegal.
Posted by tiger91
In my own little world
Member since Nov 2005
40011 posts
Posted on 3/2/16 at 2:24 pm to
quote:

So you think it's ok for her to leave her phone where a kid could get to it?????


Kids need to keep their damn hands to themselves and not be picking up other peoples stuff and going through it. KID IS STUPID. I've never picked up someones phone that is just laying around at work.
Posted by KG6
Member since Aug 2009
10920 posts
Posted on 3/2/16 at 2:27 pm to
Is it theft if he didn't distribute them? Honest question. If you left your phone on the table at a restaurant and went to the bathroom. Then a person sits at your table and looks through your phone. Doesn't remove it from the table, just is looking through it. Can you have them arrested for theft? I guess that's where my folder analogy from yesterday came from. If it was just a file on the table and they opened it up, is that illegal and can you press charges? Again, no one is taking anything, just accessing and viewing.
This post was edited on 3/2/16 at 2:28 pm
Posted by BluegrassBelle
RIP Hefty Lefty - 1981-2019
Member since Nov 2010
106265 posts
Posted on 3/2/16 at 2:27 pm to
I would argue if it isn't legally accessible then she shouldn't be held responsible. Those were her private photos, not posted on social media or anywhere else that's meant to be shared publicly. And the photos were to her husband, so between two consenting adults. She wasn't distributing them or willingly showing them to students.

I'd have my district's arse over that.
Posted by dukke v
PLUTO
Member since Jul 2006
216143 posts
Posted on 3/2/16 at 2:31 pm to
quote:

yes...that is private property...consider it like trespassing.



While I believe the kid should be punished, the teacher should have had it in her purse or somewhere NOT in the open...But I agree. She should not be fired or forced to resign...This is not the 70's where she had a playboy or something like that laying on her desk.....
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112637 posts
Posted on 3/2/16 at 2:32 pm to
quote:

I would argue if it isn't legally accessible then she shouldn't be held responsible
I mean, you'd agree that she can't literally have anything she wants on her phone and get away with it being made public just because it was illegally accessed, you'd agree with that, correct?

And my 2nd point on that is, if he just looked at the pics(didn't distribute), is he actually committing theft?
Jump to page
Page First 3 4 5 6 7 ... 13
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 13Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram