- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Tangipahoa Parish rape victim ordered to pay her abuser child support
Posted on 6/20/22 at 11:26 am to JDPndahizzy
Posted on 6/20/22 at 11:26 am to JDPndahizzy
quote:
I agree. And it probably doesn't help that the system is full of 16 year old mothers as well.
The prisons would be more overcrowded than ever if these laws were enforced in our cities.
LINK
1
Posted on 6/20/22 at 11:28 am to Olderthandirt
No doubt!!!!
Posted on 6/20/22 at 11:34 am to mindbreaker
quote:
Hey this is families court so I'm not allowed to do math and see that since the child is 6 and the mother is 22 years old you obviously got her pregnant when she was 16 which is pretty illegal. But hey it's family court so we have to ignore that.
The age of consent is 16, in a vast majority of states (35).
Posted on 6/20/22 at 11:55 am to TigerintheNO
quote:
The age of consent is 16, in a vast majority of states (35).
It is 16 in England too, but that is like your 35, and has zero to do with this. It may be 14 on the moon. Who knows?
What I want to know is why the judge gave the product of a rape into the custody of the rapist, contrary to LA law? Can we have the judge explain that part?
Also, why did the Sheriff's dept. not charge this man for 7 years? The Sheriff saying we have figured out why this occurred does not explain to his constituents how it occurred. Can we have the Sheriff clearly explain how this happened?
Posted on 6/20/22 at 11:55 am to TigerintheNO
quote:
The age of consent is 16, in a vast majority of states (35).
And that or less in most European countries.
Posted on 6/20/22 at 11:56 am to mindbreaker
quote:
which just pisses me off more about the justice system. Hey this is families court so I'm not allowed to do math and see that since the child is 6 and the mother is 22 years old you obviously got her pregnant when she was 16 which is pretty illegal. But hey it's family court so we have to ignore that.
True but if the goal of the 2011 proceeding was obtaining child support for the child from the father, obviously having the father locked up would defeat that goal. Plus with no such charges made by the police or brought before the court by the DA, I’m not sure what the judge could have done of his own accord.
Posted on 6/20/22 at 12:04 pm to Hangit
quote:
It is 16 in England too, but that is like your 35, and has zero to do with this. It may be 14 on the moon. Who knows?
What I want to know is why the judge gave the product of a rape into the custody of the rapist, contrary to LA law?
Can we have the judge explain that part?
The judge would probably say that,
-the child was 9 when rape was first mentioned, custody had already been awarded to the father
-the mother was 17 when the child was born
-there was no mention on where the child was conceived
quote:
Also, why did the Sheriff's dept. not charge this man for 7 years?
that is a different story, no defense for that
Posted on 6/20/22 at 12:05 pm to Havoc
quote:
I’m not sure what the judge could have done of his own accord.
I am not an attorney and do not know. If a judge is judging a traffic ticket, and a felony runs up the aisle and jumps in his lap, what is the procedure to go forward? Do they all just forget it and go to lunch, or what?
Posted on 6/20/22 at 12:13 pm to Hangit
quote:
I am not an attorney and do not know. If a judge is judging a traffic ticket, and a felony runs up the aisle and jumps in his lap, what is the procedure to go forward? Do they all just forget it and go to lunch, or what?
I actually saw this happen they have to look at the case in front of them and that's it. For example: I was in court to get my suspended license taken care of (didn't pay an inspection sticker ticket because I was broke in my 20's). There was a case brought before the judge about a dude arrested for disorderly conduct at a gas station. Now this dude was wasted and drove up to the gas station and parked. But since he was arrested for disorderly conduct and not DUI the judge wouldn't let the talk about the fact he drove drunk to the store in the first place.
Is this right? hell no, I think it's stupid by all the way around. But our legal system is pretty stupid in general. There is a reason we lead the world in incarcerations by a lot.
Posted on 6/20/22 at 12:21 pm to boudinman
quote:. Going to be hard to seat a grand jury that is impartial with all the news this has gotten.
Expect the DA to convene a grand jury, present ALL of the evidence including that from the family court judge, and then see if the grand jury decides an indictment is necessary.
Posted on 6/20/22 at 12:23 pm to Hangit
quote:. JBE’s brother this won’t happen
Can we have the Sheriff clearly explain how this happened?
Posted on 6/20/22 at 12:30 pm to mindbreaker
quote:
There was a case brought before the judge about a dude arrested for disorderly conduct at a gas station. Now this dude was wasted and drove up to the gas station and parked. But since he was arrested for disorderly conduct and not DUI the judge wouldn't let the talk about the fact he drove drunk to the store in the first place.
Is this right? hell no, I think it's stupid by all the way around. But our legal system is pretty stupid in general. There is a reason we lead the world in incarcerations by a lot.
Mid 90s Lawrence Taylor was found sleeping in car on the highway with empty liquor bottles early one morning, was arrested for DWI.
His lawyers successfully argued that there was no proof that he drove drunk.
His keys were not in the ignition, car was on side of the road in park. He simply pulled over on side of the road had a few drinks and went to sleep, never drove under the influence.
Posted on 6/20/22 at 12:36 pm to Ponchy Tiger
I highly doubt any grandjury will vote to indict, unless DA really wants them too. Alcohol, Bars, fake id's, consensual sex, custody issues, etc. Will be hard to get any conviction.
This post was edited on 6/20/22 at 1:30 pm
Posted on 6/20/22 at 12:43 pm to Ponchy Tiger
quote:
JBE’s brother this won’t happen
It will not happen if he is not asked. When the reporter was interviewing him, he said, we found out what happened and have taken steps to make sure it doesn't happen again. The reporter neglected to ask what it was that they found out had happened.
That is the part the public wants to know. Why was this pigeonholed for 7 years, until Nak turned a light on it?
Posted on 6/20/22 at 12:48 pm to Hangit
quote:
The reporter neglected to ask what it was that they found out had happened.
I'm sorry, I can't give you anymore detail on an ongoing and open investigation....
Posted on 6/20/22 at 12:50 pm to boudinman
quote:
I highly doubt any grandjury will vote to indite, unless DA really wants them too. Alcohol, Bars, fake id's, consensual sex, custody issues, etc. Will be hard to get any conviction.
22-6=16
36-6=30
18>16
Just won the case for the prosecution.
Posted on 6/20/22 at 1:07 pm to JDPndahizzy
quote:
I'm sorry, I can't give you anymore detail on an ongoing and open investigation
They have gone to that well too many times. I advocate a quick Taser boost to the user of this tired excuse.
Posted on 6/20/22 at 1:15 pm to Hangit
Sounds like she used a fake ID in the bar, showed the guy the ID that she was 21, and passed herself off as a college student.
Posted on 6/20/22 at 1:29 pm to MrLSU
quote:
Sounds like she used a fake ID in the bar, showed the guy the ID that she was 21, and passed herself off as a college student.
This still has no bearing on the law and whether he is guilty of a crime.
Posted on 6/20/22 at 1:29 pm to Bronc
quote:
names her friend in the police report
If you’re referring to her voluntary statement about the rape, I personally know one of the girls she names that she was with and in 2005 she wasn’t a minor.
Page 37 of 42
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News