- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 6/14/22 at 12:56 pm to Olderthandirt
Looks like you took a quick pic of that out of your personal stash...interesting
This post was edited on 6/14/22 at 12:59 pm
Posted on 6/14/22 at 1:01 pm to tiger91
quote:
How did the dad get full custody??
Article says because she gave the daughter a cell phone…
Which is insane if true
Posted on 6/14/22 at 1:04 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
Article says because she gave the daughter a cell phone…
Which is insane if true
It could be true.. Court orders are nothing to frick around with.
Posted on 6/14/22 at 1:08 pm to JDPndahizzy
And OTOH, family court judges are basically dictators who will do whatever they goddamn please.
Which isn’t good when one side or the other has connections to the judge.
Which isn’t good when one side or the other has connections to the judge.
Posted on 6/14/22 at 1:13 pm to SammyTiger
The dad paid the girls cell phone bill. The daughter got told to open the phone so he could see through the phone and she wouldn’t. He took the phone away. The mom then bought her a trap phone
Posted on 6/14/22 at 1:22 pm to CypressTrout10
Why is the cellphone an issue?
Posted on 6/14/22 at 1:38 pm to CypressTrout10
quote:
The dad paid the girls cell phone bill. The daughter got told to open the phone so he could see through the phone and she wouldn’t. He took the phone away. The mom then bought her a trap phone
I feel like this is either the most inept court in Louisiana(and that's saying something) or there needs to be A LOT more to this story than parenting disagreements over a cell phone.
And regardless if she is the most unfit mother in the state, there is zero excuse for the police department and court to essentially hide the rapists records under seal and refuse to investigate despite a sworn admission and irrefutable DNA evidence of, at a minimum, felony statutory rape.
Posted on 6/14/22 at 1:40 pm to CypressTrout10
Dad probably doesn’t want his daughter banging 30 year olds when she’s 16 at bars like her mom did. Can’t blame him for looking out for his teenage daughter.
Posted on 6/14/22 at 1:41 pm to The Boat
quote:
Dad probably doesn’t want his daughter banging 30 year olds when she’s 16 at bars like her mom did. Can’t blame him for looking out for his teenage daughter.
Posted on 6/14/22 at 1:42 pm to The Boat
quote:
Dad probably doesn’t want his daughter banging 30 year olds when she’s 16 at bars like her mom did. Can’t blame him for looking out for his teenage daughter.
Damn near spit my drink out
Posted on 6/14/22 at 1:43 pm to Bronc
Ordo ab chao.
This post was edited on 6/16/22 at 12:52 pm
Posted on 6/14/22 at 1:45 pm to Deactived
quote:
He was 30. Since youve moved the situation out of a restaurant and into a bar, lets see what could happen.
In the police report filed by the girl, she explicitly says she was at a bar and in WBRZ's newscast they say it was a bar. The only place restaurant was mentioned is in the online WBRZ article. That is some weak-arse inconsistent reporting.
Posted on 6/14/22 at 1:51 pm to SPEEDY
quote:Poor boy friend.
quote:
Everyone assumed it [the pregnancy] was from a boyfriend, and I let them believe that," Abelseth recalled.
Posted on 6/14/22 at 1:55 pm to Olderthandirt
quote:
In this case I typed in Bronc and TigerDroppings and this came up.
Interesting
You know Google works on algorithms that cater to your past searches huh? Wonder why Google seems to think you'd be into homoerotic material?
This post was edited on 6/14/22 at 1:58 pm
Posted on 6/14/22 at 1:57 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
and you cant help but still liquor her up
more projection
Actually, it isn't projection, it is entirely inconsistent with the facts. In both the police report and TV interview, the girl explicitly states she got intoxicated with two friends who left her at the bar before Barnes offered her a ride. At no point does she say he bought or offered her a drink.
DISCLAIMER: I know this can be construed to make him look more creepy. I am not defending him, so before accusing me of being a rapist apologist, please watch the damn interview and read the damn police report. God forbid we base some of these rants on the few facts available.
Posted on 6/14/22 at 1:57 pm to Olderthandirt
quote:They found the "other side of the story"?
Does anyone else think it interesting that the organization defending her in the article pulled their GoFundMe page for the alleged victim?
Posted on 6/14/22 at 2:07 pm to Bronc
Humilitas occidit superbiam.
This post was edited on 6/16/22 at 12:51 pm
Posted on 6/14/22 at 2:22 pm to Obtuse1
quote:
The crime is Carnal Knowledge of a juvenile and there is a felony or misdemeanor.
He was clearly in the codified felony range. It is a misdemeanor is when the perpetrator is within 2-4 years of the victim's age.
Is it correct to assume, due to DNA results, he has confessed to being guilty of Felony Carnal Knowledge of a Juvenile? If so, does that meet the legal definition of rape as it applies to the law preventing custody of the child conceived in that act?
I am not white knighting for anyone, I am only trying to conceive of a legal reason why a judge granted him full custody.
Posted on 6/14/22 at 2:28 pm to Basura Blanco
quote:
Actually, it isn't projection, it is entirely inconsistent with the facts. In both the police report and TV interview, the girl explicitly states she got intoxicated with two friends who left her at the bar before Barnes offered her a ride. At no point does she say he bought or offered her a drink.
DISCLAIMER: I know this can be construed to make him look more creepy. I am not defending him, so before accusing me of being a rapist apologist, please watch the damn interview and read the damn police report. God forbid we base some of these rants on the few facts available.
I mean I did watch the report. Her words were: I was at a bar, my ride wanted to go home, the guy offered to take me to my home later, she stayed, he took her to his house, not hers, and raped her, which produced a kid and DNA evidence unequivocally proves he was 30, she was 16 at the time.
Even if she consented and is lying about that part, the law is clear on this, it was felony statutory rape. The only thing in question is if it was forced/date rape.
But I also cant get over the irony of him in a court battle over cell phones, now trying to monitor and control his 16 year old daughter's phone from guys presumably just like him. The dude clearly knows he was a POS and wouldn't want his daughter ending up like he did to his mom.
Page 12 of 42
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News