Started By
Message
locked post

taking down General Lee statue in the CBD?

Posted on 6/23/15 at 7:56 pm
Posted by Dr. Morgus
Member since Dec 2001
Member since Jul 2013
3740 posts
Posted on 6/23/15 at 7:56 pm
Heard the topic discussed on 870 this afternoon and by Clancy Dubos' pansy arse.
What do you all think?

I'd personally be disgusted. Take down every statue during the slave era? It's not going to erase what happened. It's bad enough the media stirs the pot but what...take down Andrew Jackson out of the square too because he owned slaves? Where does it stop.

People should focus their time and energy on doing something good in the community and not fighting to hide history
Posted by REG861
Ocelot, Iowa
Member since Oct 2011
37977 posts
Posted on 6/23/15 at 7:57 pm to
People are going to be pretty disappointed when they take it down and people still get murdered and racism still exists.
Posted by LSUmajek
Kemah
Member since Dec 2013
585 posts
Posted on 6/23/15 at 7:57 pm to
Can't erase what happened.. If you don't talk about history, it's bound to happen again...
Posted by rmnldr
Member since Oct 2013
39894 posts
Posted on 6/23/15 at 7:58 pm to
Just wait til it all blows over and jack shite gets done.


quote:

Can't erase what happened.. If you don't talk about history, it's bound to happen again...

This post was edited on 6/23/15 at 7:59 pm
Posted by weagle99
Member since Nov 2011
35893 posts
Posted on 6/23/15 at 8:00 pm to
Posted by Champagne
Sabine Free State.
Member since Oct 2007
54169 posts
Posted on 6/23/15 at 8:03 pm to
Let them pack it with a bunch of high explosive material and film it being blown to smithereens, like the US Army did to the stone Swastika at that stadium in Germany right after the war. Will that make them happy? Will that solve anything?

Sensible people are not going to be able to stop this Leftist GroupThink mass delusional conviction that these stupid symbolic gestures, words, and prohibitions on flags are going to solve real problems.

All we can do is let them run wild with it until they get tired of it, and the news moves on to something else. The proponents of this mass hysteria will wake one day to observe that not one real problem was solved by all of their efforts.

The Democrats are loving this orgy of agony. Any and all scrutiny of them and their failed policies is being completely ignored.

Hillary is getting a free vacation from any scrutiny of her merits as a potential POTUS.

This post was edited on 6/23/15 at 8:05 pm
Posted by Bushmaster
19th Hole
Member since Oct 2008
39954 posts
Posted on 6/23/15 at 8:03 pm to
When all the flags and statues come down the black community will all get good jobs and off welfare and stop killing each other. I'm sure of it!!
Posted by rsbd
banks of the Mississippi
Member since Jan 2007
23390 posts
Posted on 6/23/15 at 8:14 pm to
George Washington Carver, was a slave owner..
Posted by lsuwontonwrap
Member since Aug 2012
34147 posts
Posted on 6/23/15 at 8:22 pm to
Posted by rsbd
banks of the Mississippi
Member since Jan 2007
23390 posts
Posted on 6/23/15 at 8:34 pm to
Posted by Shexter
Prairieville
Member since Feb 2014
19714 posts
Posted on 6/23/15 at 9:25 pm to
quote:

The census (1860) also determined that there were fewer than 385,000 individuals who owned slaves. Even if all slaveholders had been white, that would amount to only 1.4 percent of whites in the country (or 4.8 percent of southern whites owning one or more slaves).

quote:

In the final analysis, Yale historian David Brion Davis in his definitive 2006 history “Inhuman Bondage: The Rise and Fall of Slavery in the New World” notes that “colonial North America…surprisingly received only 5 to 6 percent of the African slaves shipped across the Atlantic.”....the best estimate for the number of Africans enslaved by Europeans amounts to 11 million. In other words,..... at least 97% of all African men, women and children who were kidnapped, sold, and taken from their homes, were sent somewhere other than the British colonies of North America
This post was edited on 6/23/15 at 9:33 pm
Posted by Buck Dancer
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2008
4845 posts
Posted on 6/23/15 at 9:34 pm to
White people feeling guilty for the current state of african american affairs by removing past racist/historic relics. Unfortunately it is not going to stop black on black crime, high levels of poverty and bad education in the poor black neighborhoods.

Maybe instead of spending money and energy on removing relics of people that shaped our past that have been dead for 100 years we should focus our spending money and energy on bettering our lower socioeconomic people.

Rev Sharpton don't care about the future, he only cares about race baiting on the past and keeping his people in poverty while stuffing his pockets.
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 6/23/15 at 9:37 pm to
Jesus fricking Christ the liberals are thrilled these murders happened
Posted by Tiger1242
Member since Jul 2011
33115 posts
Posted on 6/23/15 at 9:41 pm to
All it takes is for someone connected to some actual cause/tragedy to decide that's what they want and it will happen.

Also, they could remove Andrew Jacksons because he was a shitty president, and the battle of New Orleans happened after the war of 1812 ended anyway
Posted by rsbd
banks of the Mississippi
Member since Jan 2007
23390 posts
Posted on 6/23/15 at 10:09 pm to
Less than 4% of all African slaves came to what is now the United States.. Majority of slaves shipped out of Africa were sent to Jamaica, Haiti and the Caribbean..
Posted by Da #1 Stunna
985
Member since Oct 2012
1960 posts
Posted on 6/23/15 at 11:06 pm to
Over the top hypersensitivity political correctness is destroying this country.

Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson should both be in prison for creating the current racial climate, fanning the flames of anarchy, rioting and looting.

Our President is also complicit along with his version of our Justice Department.

God Bless America!!

Posted by PowerTool
The dark side of the road
Member since Dec 2009
23088 posts
Posted on 6/24/15 at 1:24 am to
I'm glad someone is finally willing to talk about the real reason behind all the murders, crackheads, and poverty in New Orleans. You guessed it: Lee Circle.

This whole frenzy reminds me of Norm Macdonald on SNL blaming Frank Stallone for everything.
Posted by fouldeliverer
Lannisport
Member since Nov 2008
13538 posts
Posted on 6/24/15 at 2:40 am to
quote:

The census (1860) also determined that there were fewer than 385,000 individuals who owned slaves. Even if all slaveholders had been white, that would amount to only 1.4 percent of whites in the country (or 4.8 percent of southern whites owning one or more slaves).


That's not even close to being correct. Whoever you quote that from appears to have done a a simple and illogical calculation of 385,000 out of 8 million Southern whites. Which is not proper, and not how the census report calculated it. It is proper to determine the percentage of slave holding families



This is the simplest way to show how mistaken he was. As you can see the slavery statistics census report of 1860 (ch. 14) calculates it as 15.8% for 1850. The numbers wouldn't be much different in 1860. Data is being excluded from Gulf Coast states but again that isn't going to change how the data is calculated or somehow change it from 15 to 1.5%

Besides the fact your quotes numbers are wrong the citation of said data belies the fact that non-slaveholding whites benefited greatly from slavery. People often quote that a small minority of whites owned slaves but that hardly matters.

Even if only 1.4 percent of whites owned slaves, slaves accounted for 33% of the Southern population and were the backbone of the economy. In 1860, 89 percent of the nation's African Americans were slaves. That's the entire nation not just the South. Sure some people want to say oh but some colored people owned slaves but inconsequential to this point. If you were a poor non-slaveholding white the fact negro slavery existed meant there were always someone lower on the social and economic ladder. It meant that some poor black girl was being whipped to pick the cotton. It meant if you were a poor white that couldn't afford a slave you could find a job to whip that girl rather than the one picking the cotton. It meant there were jobs available where you could be paid to hunt down that runaway girl after she couldn't take the whippings of the overseer and the sexual abuse of her owner. You could find a job on a steamboat that transported slaves down river as they were sold from Virginia and the Carolinas to the Deep South. You could work as a clerk in an financial office who insured the transportation of the slaves or work for the bank that loaned money for the purchase of slaves. You could sweep the floors of the slave auction house. And why would you work all these jobs? Because maybe one day you could save up enough to buy your own slave.

See my point here? That's what gets lost in all the talk about percentages and what not. American Slavery was an evil institution that beget wickedness of all kinds and benefited non-slave holding whites of both the North and South. How many whites owned slaves or the fact that a small number of free blacks did as well takes us away of facing the abominations of the institution.
This post was edited on 6/24/15 at 3:05 am
Posted by fouldeliverer
Lannisport
Member since Nov 2008
13538 posts
Posted on 6/24/15 at 2:50 am to





Posted by rsbd
banks of the Mississippi
Member since Jan 2007
23390 posts
Posted on 6/24/15 at 6:31 am to
All the down votes on this thread are thanks to anonymous white guilt..
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram