Started By
Message

re: Supreme Court ponders the right to pray on the 50-yard line

Posted on 4/26/22 at 10:46 am to
Posted by sgallo3
Lake Charles
Member since Sep 2008
27227 posts
Posted on 4/26/22 at 10:46 am to
quote:

Just as the constitution says the government cannot compel you to pray, likewise it also prohibits the government from forbidding you to pray.

you must have missed the precedent the poster above cited.
Garcetti v Ceballos.
quote:

The Court ruled, in a 5–4 decision, that because his statements were made pursuant to his position as a public employee, rather than as a private citizen, his speech had no First Amendment protection.

So if he is a public employee, AKA a coach at a public high school, they could very well forbid it.

I think the current supreme court will rule in the coach's favor tho. Saying they couldn't rule the other way is just wrong though.
This post was edited on 4/26/22 at 10:47 am
Posted by sgallo3
Lake Charles
Member since Sep 2008
27227 posts
Posted on 4/26/22 at 10:48 am to
quote:

I bet the same people on this board would lose their mind if a coach had their players taking part in Islamic prayer

There would be an entire shitshow if Brayden's coach led an Islamic prayer that he chose not to participate in and then coincidentally he lost his starting shortstop spot the next game. Guarantee that.
Posted by TDTOM
Member since Jan 2021
25893 posts
Posted on 4/26/22 at 10:51 am to
quote:

I bet the same people on this board would lose their mind if a coach had their players taking part in Islamic prayer



The coach is not "having" them do anything. It is up to the player whether they participate or not.
Posted by sgallo3
Lake Charles
Member since Sep 2008
27227 posts
Posted on 4/26/22 at 10:53 am to
quote:

The coach is not "having" them do anything. It is up to the player whether they participate or not.

This has been addressed. Some coaches don't exactly appreciate when their players don't participate in activities with the rest of the team.
Posted by nugget
Abrego Garcia Fan
Member since Dec 2009
15735 posts
Posted on 4/26/22 at 10:53 am to
quote:

There would be an entire shitshow if Brayden's coach led an Islamic prayer that he chose not to participate in and then coincidentally he lost his starting shortstop spot the next game. Guarantee that.


Is this where the left becomes hardcore textualist when it fits their agenda?
Posted by sgallo3
Lake Charles
Member since Sep 2008
27227 posts
Posted on 4/26/22 at 10:54 am to
quote:

Is this where the left becomes hardcore textualist when it fits their agenda?

no. this is where growing up in southwest Louisiana and playing sports I've seen how parents will blame politics as the reason their kid isn't starting on their tee ball team much less high school sports.
Posted by TDTOM
Member since Jan 2021
25893 posts
Posted on 4/26/22 at 10:58 am to
bullshite. That is an excuse for sucking at your position.
Posted by mindbreaker
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2011
7916 posts
Posted on 4/26/22 at 10:59 am to
quote:

pressure corporations to be pedo friendly


Literally not happening anywhere no matter how many times you say it
Posted by Abstract Queso Dip
Member since Mar 2021
5878 posts
Posted on 4/26/22 at 11:01 am to
Who's downvoting leading the team in prayer to Allah?

Bunch of hypocrites and lack of critical thinking here on the OT.
Posted by The Spleen
Member since Dec 2010
38865 posts
Posted on 4/26/22 at 11:03 am to
quote:

I don't see how anyone can deny this.


I guess I get it because religion and prayer are so ingrained in southern culture and people that participate just assume everyone is cool with it because in most cases the vast majority are. Most people that aren’t into prayer just go along to get along.
Posted by RealityTiger
Geismar, LA
Member since Jan 2010
20543 posts
Posted on 4/26/22 at 11:07 am to
quote:

I don't see how anyone can deny this. At some schools there would only be 1 player sitting out the prayer.

I actually dealt with this as a player but I just went along with the prayer. It's not that big of a deal and my teammates were 90% into it.

I can see the issue though where a kid sits out the prayer and then is passed up on the depth chart the next week. some parents would lose their shite saying it was because they weren't joining the prayer. If i was the coach I'd rather avoid that entirely. Let the players on the team lead a prayer if they want to is the best solution.


I can make up quite a few hypotheticals of how an a-hole coach can retaliate on the players. That doesn't mean anything to me about the practice of prayer itself. That says more about that a-hole coach as a person.



Posted by Antonio Moss
The South
Member since Mar 2006
49417 posts
Posted on 4/26/22 at 11:09 am to
quote:

You have the right to an education.


No, you do not.


quote:

We see you waived that right.


He is correct; you are wrong. Rights are limitations on government action.
Posted by sgallo3
Lake Charles
Member since Sep 2008
27227 posts
Posted on 4/26/22 at 11:11 am to
quote:

I can make up quite a few hypotheticals of how an a-hole coach can retaliate on the players. That doesn't mean anything to me about the practice of prayer itself. That says more about that a-hole coach as a person.

I just dont see why the coach needs to lead the prayer rather than letting a player do it.
Posted by Antonio Moss
The South
Member since Mar 2006
49417 posts
Posted on 4/26/22 at 11:17 am to
quote:

Explain what nor prohibit the Free Exercise Thereof means, I'll wait. The Free Exercise Clause gets totally ignored by those that think like you.


This only makes sense if you completely ignore the concept of a State Actor.
Posted by Mike da Tigah
Bravo Romeo Lima Alpha
Member since Feb 2005
61834 posts
Posted on 4/26/22 at 11:19 am to
quote:

You really need to read and digest Garcetti v Ceballos which speaks to what you are talking about whether the court finds Kennedy's conduct is or isn't prohibited. Speech of a public official/government employee is only protected if it is engaged in as a private citizen. It is no longer protected if it is expressed during their public duty.


I don’t need an activist, or living document court and perverted precedent to tell me what the first amendment clearly says in the English Language, and which protects individual religious liberty in the United States regardless of any nuance someone wants to insert into the words to chisel away at religion in America. All of this garbage started with an FDR appointee Hugo Black who was adamantly opposed to the RCC and began the perversion of the establishment clause.

I prefer to stick with Thomas Jefferson, the actual author of it, who held bible studies in government buildings, held national days of prayer and fasting, and who clearly stated what the intention of the wall was for, and it was most certainly NOT intended to alienate religion, or one’s religious devotion from public life.

Matter of fact, the founder of the American public school system was a man named Horace Mann, and he used the actual KJV Bible in public schools to teach people to read.

Absolutely NONE of the revisionist activist court crap stands up to original intent. NONE of it.
Posted by TDTOM
Member since Jan 2021
25893 posts
Posted on 4/26/22 at 11:57 am to
quote:

I just dont see why the coach needs to lead the prayer rather than letting a player do it.




You think that would matter to these lunatics?
Posted by mindbreaker
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2011
7916 posts
Posted on 4/26/22 at 12:10 pm to
quote:

I prefer to stick with Thomas Jefferson, the actual author of it, who held bible studies in government buildings, held national days of prayer and fasting, and who clearly stated what the intention of the wall was for, and it was most certainly NOT intended to alienate religion, or one’s religious devotion from public life.


He's also the guy that said we should throw away the constitution and start over every 20 years. But by all means continuing cherry picking the parts you like to fit your agenda
Posted by Turf Taint
New Orleans
Member since Jun 2021
6010 posts
Posted on 4/26/22 at 12:38 pm to
quote:

Supreme Court ponders the right to pray on the 50-yard line


The Supreme Court clearly are not Jacksonville Jaguar fans
Posted by meansonny
ATL
Member since Sep 2012
26821 posts
Posted on 4/26/22 at 12:49 pm to
quote:

Most people that aren’t into prayer just go along to get along.


There is no "go along to get along" though.

No one is blocking traffic to pray.
No one is holding up the next sporting event to pray.
If someone "isnt in to it" they can just go home.

Why does a coach kneeling after a game effect anyone else?

I never understand this argument.
Posted by meansonny
ATL
Member since Sep 2012
26821 posts
Posted on 4/26/22 at 12:53 pm to
quote:

I just dont see why the coach needs to lead the prayer rather than letting a player do it.


That is why this is going to the supreme court.

The coach isnt leading prayer.
He is kneeling on the 50 yard line and praying by himself silently.
Others (players and coaches) are voluntarily gathering with him.

The action is no different than tim tebow in the corner of an endzone. The differences are that others are joining him and that he was a county employee.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram