Started By
Message

Subchorionic hematoma @6 weeks pregnant

Posted on 10/31/19 at 9:07 am
Posted by TIGERBAIT84
Member since May 2007
1958 posts
Posted on 10/31/19 at 9:07 am
Congrats to me I had secks (no pics) and we are having our third child.

We just had our first ultrasound and we are six weeks along. The doctor said that the sac is intact, we have a pregnancy and a 120 bpm heartbeat.

She said that she noticed a small subchorionic hematoma. In a nutshell this is a busted blood vessel outside of the sac between the uterine wall. She didn’t seem overly concerned and wants a two week follow up. She compared this to a bruise.

Do any or you folks have or have had you other experience this? Can you provide your experience to give my wife an idea of what you’ve experienced?

We do have two healthy children and we have lost two children to give you a history. We have not however experienced this condition.


Thanks and try to keep the jokes to a minimum ;)
Posted by sweetwaterbilly
Member since Mar 2017
19351 posts
Posted on 10/31/19 at 9:08 am to
I don't have any insight into that but prayers that it all turns out okay OP
Posted by Motorboat
At the camp
Member since Oct 2007
22681 posts
Posted on 10/31/19 at 9:08 am to
I'm not a doc but as you know, they will tell you all kinds of horrible things that make you worry and they usually amount to nothing. hope it all works out and congrats!
Posted by macatak911
Metairie, LA
Member since Sep 2007
11072 posts
Posted on 10/31/19 at 9:09 am to
We had this early on in our current pregnancy. Went away over time and everything is doing good and on track.
Posted by OysterPoBoy
City of St. George
Member since Jul 2013
35088 posts
Posted on 10/31/19 at 9:10 am to
There's nothing more nerve racking than ultrasounds. It sounds like the doctor wasn't too concerned. Congratulations!
Posted by Lithium
Member since Dec 2004
61922 posts
Posted on 10/31/19 at 9:10 am to
Congrats on the new one. It's not that uncommon. Everything is fine.
Posted by Giantkiller
the internet.
Member since Sep 2007
20317 posts
Posted on 10/31/19 at 9:11 am to
Congrats to you, OP. We had our third a few years ago and experienced some mild placenta previa. It all turned out well and if you didn't see any concern in your OB, it should be fine.

Good luck and God bless.
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
166246 posts
Posted on 10/31/19 at 9:11 am to
bbc bruising
Posted by CptRusty
Basket of Deplorables
Member since Aug 2011
11740 posts
Posted on 10/31/19 at 9:14 am to
quote:

She compared this to a bruise.



Congrats on the sex, but it sounds like you may need to hold back on wreckin them guts.

quote:

Thanks and try to keep the jokes to a minimum ;)





You definitely came to the right place.

Seriously though, congrats
This post was edited on 10/31/19 at 9:16 am
Posted by 0
Member since Aug 2011
16628 posts
Posted on 10/31/19 at 9:14 am to
quote:

Subchorionic hematoma @6 weeks pregnant


I don't remember how far along she was but my wife had the same thing. It eventually went away and she had a normal pregnancy. I don't think it's all that uncommon or very dangerous.
Posted by TIGERBAIT84
Member since May 2007
1958 posts
Posted on 10/31/19 at 9:23 am to

Thank you all for the quick responses means a lot.

I will be sure to post updates as I have them.
This post was edited on 10/31/19 at 10:07 am
Posted by TwoFace
Member since Mar 2018
1114 posts
Posted on 10/31/19 at 9:27 am to
Many pregnant women run to the emergency room when they see vaginal blood during pregnancy, even though there is likely nothing to do if less than 20 weeks... "subchorionic hemorrhage in early pregnancy" is a common diagnosis in the E.R.... several times per shift is not an exaggeration. Trust the OB/GYN...
Posted by Crescent Connection
Lafayette/Nola
Member since Jun 2008
2023 posts
Posted on 10/31/19 at 9:29 am to
Wife had a subchorionic hematoma with our last child born this past April. They found it on ultrasound probably the same time as your wife, and the only thing different was no vaginal intercourse until it disappeared, which took probably 10-12 weeks. Also no heavy lifting or strenuous exercise for my wife during that time. Our son was born on his due date without any complications. It’s a little nerve wracking at first because this was our first time dealing with this, but I’ve learned with physicians that if they are not concerned, neither should you.

Also, expect her to have some occasional bloody discharge. That’s normal. She will probably have more frequent ultrasounds than her previous pregnancies to monitor the hematoma. Congrats on the baby, and don’t let this ruin the joy of pregnancy.
Posted by Broke
AKA Buttercup
Member since Sep 2006
65044 posts
Posted on 10/31/19 at 9:30 am to
quote:

Congrats on the new one. It's not that uncommon. Everything is fine.


quote:

Lithium


This guy is a doctor. I would listen to what he says.
Posted by TwoFace
Member since Mar 2018
1114 posts
Posted on 10/31/19 at 9:30 am to
"bbc bruising"

He could be right, ya know....
Posted by OysterPoBoy
City of St. George
Member since Jul 2013
35088 posts
Posted on 10/31/19 at 9:32 am to
quote:

the only thing different was no vaginal intercourse until it disappeared, which took probably 10-12 weeks


Hell, that wouldn't even be a change for me.
Posted by stapuffmarshy
lower 9
Member since Apr 2010
17507 posts
Posted on 10/31/19 at 9:33 am to
quote:

Thanks and try to keep the jokes to a minimum


You are welcome and of course! This is serious business.



Dr.StaPuffmarshy says stop fricking or baby will come out like this: NSFW btw




Posted by TIGERBAIT84
Member since May 2007
1958 posts
Posted on 10/31/19 at 9:51 am to
So she’s not bleeding at all. Have not prior or up to this point v
She said that she saw a small something on the ultrasound.
Posted by TIGERBAIT84
Member since May 2007
1958 posts
Posted on 10/31/19 at 9:53 am to
Thank you for sharing.
Posted by BigPapiDoesItAgain
Amérique du Nord
Member since Nov 2009
2769 posts
Posted on 10/31/19 at 10:09 am to
Most likely will be ok, but...

Nominally Subchorionic hemorrhage is indeed associated with early pregnancy loss, HOWEVER, it depends on the volume (we use the size of the gestational sac for comparison), and to a lesser extent the location of the lesion.

The great majority of the time they are inconsequential and resolve without incident. The software on the new sono machines is so advanced we can see even the tiniest collections of blood.

If a patient is having significant bleeding and the accumulation is > 50% of the volume of the sac size, then that is a worrisome scenario. If is small (ie less than 25% or so) and there is only spotting, then risk of early pregnancy loss is pretty much normal. I typically follow these with serial ultrasound until they resolve, and will also evaluate sonographically if symptoms change.

Good luck and congrats.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram