- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Stony Saturday question for ya
Posted on 2/17/18 at 11:02 am
Posted on 2/17/18 at 11:02 am
If medical science could guarantee that every baby from now on could be born 100% healthy, but the gestation period from now on would only be 3 days, would your be for or against it?
Posted on 2/17/18 at 11:04 am to Tiger the Hutt
You're saying they'd always be healthy and pregnancy would be reduced to 3 days?
Who the frick wouldn't take this? There's literally no downside.
Who the frick wouldn't take this? There's literally no downside.
Posted on 2/17/18 at 11:04 am to Tiger the Hutt
Against. Stupid people have enough babies as it is, could you imagine if they could pop out 2 a week?
Posted on 2/17/18 at 11:04 am to TH03
quote:
There's literally no downside.
Welfare moms with 47 kids
Posted on 2/17/18 at 11:05 am to TH03
quote:
There's literally no downside.
Except when the condom breaks. The morning after pill would have to be an immediate IV.
Posted on 2/17/18 at 11:06 am to TH03
quote:
There's literally no downside.
I can think of hundreds of millions of downsides.
Posted on 2/17/18 at 11:07 am to TH03
quote:
There's literally no downside.
Overpopulation of Earth.
Posted on 2/17/18 at 11:07 am to TH03
quote:
There's literally no downside.
Other than people treating the baby like a turd.
Time is needed to develop an emotional connection.
Posted on 2/17/18 at 11:09 am to TH03
quote:
There's literally no downside.
Would definitely lower medical costs in cases of a desired pregnancy, but would greatly reduce the contemplation period for an undesired pregnancy.
Posted on 2/17/18 at 11:10 am to lsunurse
I meant no downside for the people making the choice about their own pregnancy.
That's a downside on a global scale. Which is correct.
That's a downside on a global scale. Which is correct.
Posted on 2/17/18 at 11:11 am to TH03
quote:
You're saying they'd always be healthy and pregnancy would be reduced to 3 days?
Who the frick wouldn't take this? There's literally no downside.
The downside is now women can have a baby every cycle. Think about the population explosion. No downside?
Posted on 2/17/18 at 11:13 am to TH03
quote:
I meant no downside for the people making the choice about their own pregnancy.
You have no time to prepare for the baby coming home.
No time to set up a nursery, buy stuff you need. Research hospitals where you would contemplate delivering at. Research pediatricians. Decide on a name.
Posted on 2/17/18 at 11:13 am to Tiger the Hutt
I’d be in favor of you aborting any more thread ideas.
Posted on 2/17/18 at 11:15 am to lsunurse
quote:
No time to set up a nursery, buy stuff you need. Research hospitals where you would contemplate delivering at. Research pediatricians. Decide on a name.
For accidental babies.
If you spend time and agree that it's time, you set this up before conceiving.
Posted on 2/17/18 at 11:18 am to Tiger the Hutt
We'd have to have a separate trash pick up for all the babies killed after birth by degenerates who couldn't practice self control.
Posted on 2/17/18 at 11:23 am to Tiger the Hutt
How many edibles have you eaten so far today?
Posted on 2/17/18 at 11:26 am to Tiger the Hutt
just think how much better the OT would be if no one was ever born retarded.
Posted on 2/17/18 at 11:39 am to tigerstripedjacket
quote:
I’d be in favor of you aborting any more thread ideas.
This is a pretty straightforward 'for or against' question, and you get all bent out of shape about it? Who pissed in your fruitloops?
Popular
Back to top

13












