Started By
Message
locked post

Stats/Math Philosophy: You jokingly answer 288 to math Q's on here, 50% right

Posted on 9/10/16 at 8:51 am
Posted by Pectus
Internet
Member since Apr 2010
67302 posts
Posted on 9/10/16 at 8:51 am
Here's an interesting thing about statistics and recurring frequencies of numbers.

Way back when we had an internet-breaking math equation that left the computer (be it human or calculator) with an answer of 2 or 288.

This became so popular that is was covered by journalists, bloggers, and loads of internet math forums and youtube channels.

The internet was inundated with searches for the number 2 and the number 288.

OK. So let's think of other numbers that are populating webspace.

We obviously have numbers from 0-9 because they make up all the digits of our numbers.

Then we have important dates and years: 2000, 1969, 2016, 1776.

Then we have pop culture numbers in song, band, movies, books, etc. 1984, 1812, 4.

And then we have EVERY CALCULATION completed by the google calculator or answer reported on a webpage.

If we have this huge dataset of every problem that has ever been run and every number that is referenced we can look at it as a sampling of all answers to all the math problems that exist. Of course there are limitations, like a webpage, due to lack of storage space, cannot hold a number with infinite digits. Likewise, google's search bar is limited by character spaces. However, it should give us a range in which our answer will fall into because the list is so exhaustive.

OK. So, think back to the number references. The most popular ones would either be because they make up a number (single digit) or they are popular from a cultural standpoint (band, year, day), OR they are a frequently occurring SOLUTION to a problem! And who is to say that you can separate these?



All of this to say: If you jokingly put 288 as a response to a question posted on this forum, you have a good chance (better than a wild guess) of being right!

That is because 288 was thrown around so much and populated that number group of all real answers that it appears at a higher frequency than other numbers!



So have fun! Put down 288 you might be right! And the more you put it down as a joke the more right you may become, because you are adding more references to that number!


**I used tremendous hyperbole listing 50% in the title to get you to read the post. I apologize.
This post was edited on 9/10/16 at 8:54 am
Posted by athenslife101
Member since Feb 2013
20642 posts
Posted on 9/10/16 at 8:54 am to
I may be stupid, but I'm stuppider after reading that.
Posted by jimbeam
University of LSU
Member since Oct 2011
75703 posts
Posted on 9/10/16 at 8:55 am to
(no message)
This post was edited on 9/10/16 at 8:56 am
Posted by GCTiger11
Ocean Springs, MS
Member since Jan 2012
46171 posts
Posted on 9/10/16 at 8:55 am to
288 down votes incoming
Posted by Kafka
I am the moral conscience of TD
Member since Jul 2007
158988 posts
Posted on 9/10/16 at 8:55 am to
Posted by Sellecks Moustache
NC
Member since Jun 2014
5994 posts
Posted on 9/10/16 at 8:55 am to
It's 10am here, what the frick is your problem?
Posted by whit
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2010
11079 posts
Posted on 9/10/16 at 8:56 am to
Posted by Pectus
Internet
Member since Apr 2010
67302 posts
Posted on 9/10/16 at 8:57 am to
Just an interesting tidbit I had to get out there.

288 shows up so much here, so why not.
This post was edited on 9/10/16 at 8:58 am
Posted by GEAUXT
Member since Nov 2007
30616 posts
Posted on 9/10/16 at 8:58 am to
bruh...
Posted by SuperSaint
Sorting Out OT BS Since '2007'
Member since Sep 2007
151509 posts
Posted on 9/10/16 at 9:01 am to
quote:

Then we have pop culture numbers in song, band, movies, books, etc. 1984, 1812, 4.
311... You must not be down down Baw!!
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
96236 posts
Posted on 9/10/16 at 9:01 am to
42
Posted by Ash Williams
South of i-10
Member since May 2009
18563 posts
Posted on 9/10/16 at 9:01 am to
God damnit pectus.

It's too early and I'm too hungover for this shite
Posted by S
RIP Wayde
Member since Jan 2007
173690 posts
Posted on 9/10/16 at 9:03 am to
You think i read that shite on a Saturday morning?
Posted by Pectus
Internet
Member since Apr 2010
67302 posts
Posted on 9/10/16 at 9:05 am to
288's trend over the last 5 years

2's trend over the last 5 years


The year 2016 is only now getting popular:
LINK


SS: The band 311 is less popular than 288:
LINK


This post was edited on 9/10/16 at 9:08 am
Posted by Pectus
Internet
Member since Apr 2010
67302 posts
Posted on 9/10/16 at 9:10 am to
quote:

God damnit pectus.

It's too early and I'm too hungover for this shite


At least you are one of the few that read this that knows I am correct...philosophically.

Other posters don't think this is true.
Posted by PairofDucks
Member since Jul 2016
4992 posts
Posted on 9/10/16 at 9:11 am to
quote:

Just an interesting tidbit I had to get out there.


There are multiple things wrong with this statement.
Posted by Pectus
Internet
Member since Apr 2010
67302 posts
Posted on 9/10/16 at 9:14 am to
quote:



There are multiple things wrong with this statement.


If you jokingly answer:

0-9, or pi or square root of 2, 10, 15, 20, etc. you will be more right than 288.

But if you answer 19037601346481456 you will have a less of a chance of being right than if you jokingly put 288.
Posted by Pectus
Internet
Member since Apr 2010
67302 posts
Posted on 9/10/16 at 9:19 am to
I am using the same reasoning as the most common words in the English language:

Most common words in the english language

The top 100 words in the English language make up 50% of the English language.

So, I can, with the same probability of a coin flip accurately guess the next word in a sentence by using the frequency of the cluster of words in that list. Your next word will be one of the 100, 50% of the time.



So, for the 288 response, you will be correct more than less searched for numbers in google, which would represent all numbers and solutions.


Posted by athenslife101
Member since Feb 2013
20642 posts
Posted on 9/10/16 at 9:38 am to
Pectus, are you Asian?
Posted by LCA131
Home of the Fake Sig lines
Member since Feb 2008
77684 posts
Posted on 9/10/16 at 9:46 am to
OK, let's check his theory out...

Anyone bored enough to be reading this ...w/e it is, answer the following 3 questions...

What is 144 x 2?

What is 72 x 4?

What is 36 x 8?


first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram