- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: St Louis 1904
Posted on 7/7/19 at 12:49 pm to Hidden Tiger
Posted on 7/7/19 at 12:49 pm to Hidden Tiger
It depends on how far you’re willing to go. If one accepts the premise that these structures were not temporary, but that they were demolished purposefully, then that throws into doubt the narrative that they were built just for the World’s Fair. If they weren’t built for the World’s Fair, when were they built? They resemble classical architecture (Greco-Roman) far more than colonial or 19th century American architecture.
So, if they were significantly older than the World’s Fair, how much older were they? 50 years? 100 years? 500? 1000? Fomenko Chronology and Phantom Time Theory both run on the premise that the gap between the classical world and our current world is far shorter than history books report. If they are classical architecture, it completely changes the entire understanding of pre-Columbian America and how America was founded.
So, if they were significantly older than the World’s Fair, how much older were they? 50 years? 100 years? 500? 1000? Fomenko Chronology and Phantom Time Theory both run on the premise that the gap between the classical world and our current world is far shorter than history books report. If they are classical architecture, it completely changes the entire understanding of pre-Columbian America and how America was founded.
1
Posted on 7/7/19 at 1:06 pm to kingbob
This last post of yours is a great example of 'perception control'.
You messed up on the previous page by confusing Illig's theory with Fomenko's.
I realize you probably feel embarrassed by that mistake, but we all make them.
But what isn't cool is the way you handled it - by making an odd post that doesn't correlate appropriately to what you're responding to, and then slipping in a correction to your previous mistake.
You messed up on the previous page by confusing Illig's theory with Fomenko's.
I realize you probably feel embarrassed by that mistake, but we all make them.
But what isn't cool is the way you handled it - by making an odd post that doesn't correlate appropriately to what you're responding to, and then slipping in a correction to your previous mistake.
Posted on 7/7/19 at 1:43 pm to Hidden Tiger
Not really. They’re very similar theories with identical premises they differ only in the number of “repeats” over which time was manipulated. One says there’s only about 300 years of inserted/repeated history, the other claims it’s closer to 1000 years. Both theories have serious mathematical and astronomical flaws that disprove them, but they both are based on this same concept that history has been manipulated.
Posted on 7/7/19 at 1:50 pm to kingbob
Starting off with 'not really' is more perception control.
You messed up and instead of owning it you tried to divert attention and then slip in a correction - fact.
I'm not disputing they're somewhat similar, and I don't support either theory.
You messed up and instead of owning it you tried to divert attention and then slip in a correction - fact.
I'm not disputing they're somewhat similar, and I don't support either theory.
Posted on 7/7/19 at 2:00 pm to Hidden Tiger
Not really, as in I’m not ashamed. Why do you keep projecting your insecurities onto other thread contributors?
This post was edited on 7/7/19 at 2:16 pm
Posted on 7/7/19 at 2:02 pm to kingbob
So you did mess up, while carrying yourself as if you really-really know what you're talking about.
And then instead of owning it, you made a diversion post and slipped in the correction.
And now you're downvoting the fact that I've reasonably called you out on it.
I don't respect that type of behavior.
And then instead of owning it, you made a diversion post and slipped in the correction.
And now you're downvoting the fact that I've reasonably called you out on it.
I don't respect that type of behavior.
Posted on 7/7/19 at 2:14 pm to Hidden Tiger
I don’t claim to be an authority. I’m just a baw who reads conspiracy subreddits from time to time. My identity isn’t wrapped up in being right or wrong about random fringe topics. I just find them fun to discuss. If you don’t respect that, that’s fine. Respect or disrespect whatever you want. It doesn’t bother me because my self esteem is in no way based on having the respect of posters on an anonymous internet message board.
Posted on 7/7/19 at 2:22 pm to kingbob
That's cool, but it's about how you handled it, not the mistake itself.
I don't care at all that you messed up on two obscure guys and their obscure theories, even with your air of confidence as you wrote it.
The issue is your attempt to divert attention from your mistake, and then slip in the correction, and now your subsequent behavior to me calling it out.
I don't care at all that you messed up on two obscure guys and their obscure theories, even with your air of confidence as you wrote it.
The issue is your attempt to divert attention from your mistake, and then slip in the correction, and now your subsequent behavior to me calling it out.
Page 6 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News