Started By
Message

re: SpaceX Endeavor capsule might splashdown near Prnsacola

Posted on 8/1/20 at 6:41 pm to
Posted by rt3
now in the piney woods of Pineville
Member since Apr 2011
141180 posts
Posted on 8/1/20 at 6:41 pm to
quote:

When should they land?

splashdown in the Gulf should be around noon-ish tomorrow (central time)

ETA: 1:45 PM
This post was edited on 8/1/20 at 7:36 pm
Posted by cypresstiger
The South
Member since Aug 2008
10611 posts
Posted on 8/1/20 at 6:44 pm to
1:48 BR time
LINK
This post was edited on 8/1/20 at 6:51 pm
Posted by rt3
now in the piney woods of Pineville
Member since Apr 2011
141180 posts
Posted on 8/1/20 at 6:44 pm to
apparently there's a 4-person mission set to launch on board SpaceX next month
Posted by rt3
now in the piney woods of Pineville
Member since Apr 2011
141180 posts
Posted on 8/1/20 at 7:33 pm to
started detaching over Namibia... pulled away from ISS over South Africa

did its most recent departing burn near the west coast of the US
Posted by rt3
now in the piney woods of Pineville
Member since Apr 2011
141180 posts
Posted on 8/1/20 at 7:36 pm to
someone just asked these broadcasters "what does space smell like?"
Posted by rt3
now in the piney woods of Pineville
Member since Apr 2011
141180 posts
Posted on 8/1/20 at 7:58 pm to
the broadcaster on the NASA channel just said Pensacola landing site may be a no go tomorrow and the landing site could be changed again
Posted by jamboybarry
Member since Feb 2011
32653 posts
Posted on 8/1/20 at 8:00 pm to
They’ve been saying that. Panama City is the next immediate backup location. I’m sure there are others

Would be awesome if it happened to land by Grand Isle
Posted by BRgetthenet
Member since Oct 2011
117709 posts
Posted on 8/1/20 at 8:19 pm to
Middle of the Causeway, drop that bitch in the lake
Posted by Paul Allen
Montauk, NY
Member since Nov 2007
75215 posts
Posted on 8/1/20 at 8:28 pm to
quote:

Causeway


Patchy delays on the Causeway. I’ve got nominal slow downs on the high rise to the Claiborne flyover.
Posted by LSUnation78
Northshore
Member since Aug 2012
12072 posts
Posted on 8/1/20 at 8:48 pm to
Its cheap. The technical feat of landing the first stage rocket boosters is strictly due to the cost savings it provides.

Their mothership will land the crew module same way they do the boosters.
Posted by Volvagia
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2006
51907 posts
Posted on 8/1/20 at 8:57 pm to
quote:

I'm pretty surprised SpaceX would take such a vanilla approach to landing astronauts


The original designs had it, but they cut it given how much testing and time it would take to certify the systems. They say they were okay with it originally because the R+D could double up with their planned mechanism for Mars landings. When they decided on a different approach for Mars, value for it on Dragon went to nothing.
Posted by rt3
now in the piney woods of Pineville
Member since Apr 2011
141180 posts
Posted on 8/1/20 at 9:01 pm to
quote:

The original designs had it, but they cut it given how much testing and time it would take to certify the systems. They say they were okay with it originally because the R+D could double up with their planned mechanism for Mars landings. When they decided on a different approach for Mars, value for it on Dragon went to nothing.

is Falcon Heavy what they plan to use for the missions to Mars?

Posted by Free888
Member since Oct 2019
1619 posts
Posted on 8/1/20 at 9:12 pm to
No, they would use Starship.
Posted by Volvagia
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2006
51907 posts
Posted on 8/1/20 at 9:13 pm to
Negative, the project for that is called the Starship. Twice the payload capacity to LEO as the Falcon Heavy. If their talking points pans out, it will be the first serious step towards making space flight affordable. Gone are the days of it costing 10s of thousands of dollars for each pound send to orbit.

They are targeting being able to have 100 passengers at a cost of 20k per person.

This post was edited on 8/1/20 at 9:25 pm
Posted by TigerstuckinMS
Member since Nov 2005
33687 posts
Posted on 8/1/20 at 9:18 pm to
quote:

is Falcon Heavy what they plan to use for the missions to Mars?

No. That's the Big fricking Rocket they're currently in the process of designing. They can call it the Super Heavy all they want, but we remember BFR. The Falcon Heavy is, as of now, mainly for things like moon orbital trips (you can book them now) and heavy low Earth lift.

They may use the Falcon Heavy in the initial stages to send test articles and such and it's not out of the question that it may be used to send some objects like maybe communications satellites ahead of a manned mission to Mars, but people will almost certainly be riding the BFR.

This post was edited on 8/1/20 at 9:21 pm
Posted by Volvagia
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2006
51907 posts
Posted on 8/1/20 at 9:23 pm to
The engineer who put 31 rockets in the first stage definitely played Kerbal Space Program.
Posted by TigerstuckinMS
Member since Nov 2005
33687 posts
Posted on 8/1/20 at 9:23 pm to
quote:

The engineer who put 31 rockets in the first stage definitely played Kerbal Space Program.


Posted by rt3
now in the piney woods of Pineville
Member since Apr 2011
141180 posts
Posted on 8/1/20 at 9:26 pm to
Starship prototype went boom

Posted by Volvagia
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2006
51907 posts
Posted on 8/1/20 at 9:26 pm to
RIP Jeb
Posted by Volvagia
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2006
51907 posts
Posted on 8/1/20 at 9:27 pm to
Scale comparisons of size and capabilities

Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 12
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 12Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram