Started By
Message

re: Sorry gullible tards, but the US never went to the moon in person

Posted on 8/3/22 at 9:14 am to
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
120445 posts
Posted on 8/3/22 at 9:14 am to
quote:

And you yourself have seen them? You own a hubble? It's all BS. Don't believe the lies bud. I believe there's footprints there as much your wheel chair tracks are there.


Do you really not think the Russians and Chinese haven’t sent a probe up there to verify we went to the Moon? You really have to be retarded to think that they haven’t. There’s no way you can fake the footprints.
Posted by saintsfan1977
Arkansas, from Cajun country
Member since Jun 2010
10355 posts
Posted on 8/3/22 at 9:16 am to
quote:

What's on the moon that matters? America has incredible resources - so what is on the moon that makes it worthwhile other than the novelty? Maybe it can be a refueling station for travel to Mars at some point - explain why we need to be there.


I don't know what's on the moon besides craters. What was the point in 1969? Only to say we got there first. Nothing came of it. Russia just threw their hands in the air and said frick it. This is what we're told.

We supposedly went to the moon for 21 hours and we discovered that there's nothing worth going back for. In fact it was so believable that nobody else has ever been. Enemies just took our word for it. Makes total sense to me. You've all convinced me that we landed not just on the moon but In it.
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
120445 posts
Posted on 8/3/22 at 9:17 am to
quote:

Wait - you're denying LEO stuff, too? FFS, you can see the ISS with the naked eye, my guy.


Technically the ISS is still in the atmosphere:

Posted by saintsfan1977
Arkansas, from Cajun country
Member since Jun 2010
10355 posts
Posted on 8/3/22 at 9:17 am to
quote:

There’s no way you can fake the footprints


Ask Bigfoot if that's possible.
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
120445 posts
Posted on 8/3/22 at 9:20 am to
quote:

Idk if you have ever seen a cathedral but it definitely looks more fricking complicated and sophisticated than a Roman colosseum.


Those cathedrals aren’t more complicated and sophisticated than Roman aqueducts. They look nicer, but Europeans went many centuries confused on how the aqueducts worked.
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
120445 posts
Posted on 8/3/22 at 9:24 am to
quote:

Im an idiot for believing we never went to the moon?


Yes, indeed you are. Here’s the pictures of the footprints, dummy:



Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
120445 posts
Posted on 8/3/22 at 9:25 am to
quote:

What's on the moon that matters?


Helium 3 is up there as well as several other substances. There’s motive to go back, but the start up costs are insanely expensive and dangerous.
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
120445 posts
Posted on 8/3/22 at 9:27 am to
quote:

Ask Bigfoot if that's possible.


Posted by Palmetto98
Where the stars are big and bright
Member since Nov 2021
2145 posts
Posted on 8/3/22 at 9:28 am to
quote:

Those cathedrals aren’t more complicated and sophisticated than Roman aqueducts. They look nicer, but Europeans went many centuries confused on how the aqueducts worked.


They actually are much more complex than your aqueduct. The reason you didn’t see any aqueducts in medieval Europe was because there wasn’t a need for them plain and simple. The Roman Empire was basically a bunch of coastal city city states which favored the use of aqueducts while a more rural society only needed a stream or river.
Posted by xxTIMMYxx
Member since Aug 2019
17562 posts
Posted on 8/3/22 at 9:31 am to
quote:

I'm going to need a link for that, because he slugged a guy who accused him of this very thing in person


I’ve seen it. He said it to a little girl while getting teary eyed
Posted by saintsfan1977
Arkansas, from Cajun country
Member since Jun 2010
10355 posts
Posted on 8/3/22 at 9:48 am to
quote:

Yes, indeed you are. Here’s the pictures of the footprints, dummy:


I can show you pictures of pyramids on the moon too.
Posted by McLemore
Member since Dec 2003
35334 posts
Posted on 8/3/22 at 10:05 am to
quote:

And they congregate together and reinforce the stupidity. I can't always tell if it's an act or serious.


The five people who apparently thought I was serious when I said space exploration is racist supports the existence of this conundrum.
Posted by Reservoir dawg
Member since Oct 2013
15129 posts
Posted on 8/3/22 at 10:05 am to
quote:

If NASA says we did something there’s pretty good odds that we didn’t.


Says who?
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
120445 posts
Posted on 8/3/22 at 10:25 am to
quote:

Says who?


I mean, they lied for decades that a shite ton of Nazis weren’t working for them. I love NASA, but there were no doubt a bunch of Nazis at the place. The Simon Wiesenthal Center has said if Wernher Von Braun was still alive that they would prosecute him with crimes against humanity for what he did in Nazi Germany.
Posted by EA6B
TX
Member since Dec 2012
14754 posts
Posted on 8/3/22 at 11:08 am to
quote:

I don't know what's on the moon besides craters. What was the point in 1969? Only to say we got there first. Nothing came of it. Russia just threw their hands in the air and said frick it. This is what we're told.


You obviously were not alive during that era. Beating Soviet Unicom to the moon was the entire motivation, scientific exploration was a distant second. The successful landing in 1969 was the winning of a war, and yes, it caused the Russians to give up. The space program had the support of almost every American, the money, and the number of involved in it were enormous.

The Russians and many other entities outside of the US knew we were on the moon because they were monitoring the astronaut’s communications signals direct from the moon.
Posted by Palmetto98
Where the stars are big and bright
Member since Nov 2021
2145 posts
Posted on 8/3/22 at 11:23 am to
quote:

You obviously were not alive during that era. Beating Soviet Unicom to the moon was the entire motivation, scientific exploration was a distant second. The successful landing in 1969 was the winning of a war, and yes, it caused the Russians to give up. The space program had the support of almost every American, the money, and the number of involved in it were enormous. The Russians and many other entities outside of the US knew we were on the moon because they were monitoring the astronaut’s communications signals direct from the moon.


Then why haven’t the Russians, Chinese, Indiana, or Americans bothered to go back?
Posted by EA6B
TX
Member since Dec 2012
14754 posts
Posted on 8/3/22 at 11:42 am to
quote:

Then why haven’t the Russians, Chinese, Indiana, or Americans bothered to go back?


Once again it was a . “Space race” they lost. Why would the US go back, we beat the Russians, and had 5 other successful missions. The last scheduled Apollo missions 18, 19, and 20 were canceled, it was decided that the scientific return from the missions was not worth the risk, politically Nixon wanted the missions canceled, he felt we had pushed our luck too far, and didn’t want to lose a crew of astronauts while he was president.
Posted by saintsfan1977
Arkansas, from Cajun country
Member since Jun 2010
10355 posts
Posted on 8/3/22 at 12:12 pm to
quote:

Then why haven’t the Russians, Chinese, Indiana, or Americans bothered to go back?


Because humans can't travel that distance to begin with. It was a SpaceRace. Not exploration so these other people just said frick it. Nothing there lol. Even though they never went.

Monitoring transmission from the moon with walkie talkies. The entire reason a human hasn't been anywhere since is because we still can't go past LEO. Nobody went to the moon. People believe anything.

Think about it. Someone filmed the landing and takeoff on the moon. Who was it? A movie studio is the right answer.
Posted by OweO
Plaquemine, La
Member since Sep 2009
122197 posts
Posted on 8/3/22 at 12:13 pm to
quote:


Other than you going to the moon


You keep going on but ignoring my question. Is it your opinion that we didn't go to the moon or can you absolutely prove it?

You are arguing as if you know for sure.
Posted by EA6B
TX
Member since Dec 2012
14754 posts
Posted on 8/3/22 at 12:28 pm to
quote:

Think about it. Someone filmed the landing and takeoff on the moon. Who was it? A movie studio is the right answer.


If someone is going to argue the moon landings didn’t happen they should at least know something about what they are trying to disprove.

There was no video of the lunar landing from the surface of the moon. The video was from the lunar landing module approaching the surface taken through the window of the lander. The lift off from the moon was taken by a stationary camera left by the astronauts pointing at the lunar lander. It transmitted the video direct from the surface of the moon. The video of Armstrong climbing down the ladder to the surface of the moon was from a camera mounted on the lunar module. My Dad was one of the first people to see images of the first steps on the moon, the video feed that was sent out to the TV networks was delayed 20-30 seconds, he saw it as it happened.

Jump to page
Page First 6 7 8 9 10
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 8 of 10Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram