- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: So im more convinced than ever that the govt allowed 9/11 to happen
Posted on 8/7/17 at 1:59 pm to GumboPot
Posted on 8/7/17 at 1:59 pm to GumboPot
quote:
he initial damage to WTC 7 was on one side. Thus, how did WTC7 (and all the structures for that matter) collapse in near-symmetrical fashion when the damage was clearly not symmetrical?
The fires compromised a critical internal column. The fires were allowed to ravage WTC7 because of water pressure issues related to the collapse of the North and South towers.
Posted on 8/7/17 at 2:04 pm to northshorebamaman
quote:
Not to mention the vast number of architects and engineers that aren't buying the official story due to scientific research
The vast number? What percentage of all architects and engineers have gone on record to discuss this issue? One or two engineers and architects do not speak for them all.
Posted on 8/7/17 at 2:06 pm to OweO
Watch who you quote in this thread. That's not my words. 
Posted on 8/7/17 at 2:11 pm to GumboPot
Posted on 8/7/17 at 2:17 pm to therick711
quote:
The fires compromised a critical internal column. The fires were allowed to ravage WTC7 because of water pressure issues related to the collapse of the North and South towers.
Short and to the point video about building 7
There was more than one critical column in the building. How did it fall like this when fires started on one side

Posted on 8/7/17 at 2:19 pm to Placebeaux
The feed behind her could have easily been delayed.
This post was edited on 8/7/17 at 2:20 pm
Posted on 8/7/17 at 2:21 pm to bigberg2000
Honestly, why do people continue to argue with these crazy people? You're not going to convince them no matter what. The only one I would say is slightly feasible is we may have shot down United 93, but that's as far as you could go without some serious suspension of disbelief.
This post was edited on 8/7/17 at 2:26 pm
Posted on 8/7/17 at 2:23 pm to northshorebamaman
quote:
The CIA has a storied history of dropping the ball. Google Cuba.
Yeah Bay of Pigs. Also the WOMD that were never in Iraq. Yeah that was a big frick up that we are still paying for today except it wasnt a frick up, the CIA knew there was nothing there. Bush and friends started that war for many other reasons. Blame the Intel! Thats the easy thing to do, they are an unaccountable fall guy.
Posted on 8/7/17 at 2:23 pm to OMLandshark
I can definitely believe we shot down 93. That one is logical.
Posted on 8/7/17 at 2:24 pm to bigberg2000
quote:
The feed behind her could have easily been delayed.
Its a live broadcast
Posted on 8/7/17 at 2:24 pm to Placebeaux
quote:
CIA knew there was nothing there. Bush and friends started that war for many other reasons.
Yes, I know this.
Posted on 8/7/17 at 2:25 pm to Placebeaux
quote:
There was more than one critical column in the building. How did it fall like this when fires started on one side
The penthouse structure, already compromised in your video, goes first, buckling the internal columns and bowing the outside columns. It doesn't take a whole lot of imagination or engineering understanding.
The next order of business is why does it matter how many columns were critical if at least one "critical" column failed.
This post was edited on 8/7/17 at 2:26 pm
Posted on 8/7/17 at 2:26 pm to Placebeaux
quote:
Its a live broadcast
Doesn't necessarily mean the feed behind her was.
Posted on 8/7/17 at 2:26 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
Honestly, why do people continue to argue with these crazy people? You're not going to convince them no matter what. The only one I would say is slightly feasible is the may have shot down United 93, but that's as far as you could go without some serious suspension of disbelief.
Ever sheep in this thread has gotten owned with proof. Yall probably think magicians actually pull rabbits out their hats.
Posted on 8/7/17 at 2:27 pm to northshorebamaman
quote:
Doesn't necessarily mean the feed behind her was.
Well the BBC never said it was. So who is lying?
Posted on 8/7/17 at 2:31 pm to Placebeaux
Personally, I think the feed was live and it there was an error in reporting. Definitely not unusual during a live event. What was BBC's story?
Posted on 8/7/17 at 2:32 pm to Placebeaux
I never knew so many people could keep a secret. Impressive
Posted on 8/7/17 at 2:34 pm to northshorebamaman
quote:
Personally, I think the feed was live and it there was an error in reporting. Definitely not unusual during a live event. What was BBC's story?
Right. MSNBC initially reported that a bomb was found at Stuyvesant High School in the fog of war the morning of 9/11.
This post was edited on 8/7/17 at 2:38 pm
Posted on 8/7/17 at 2:36 pm to Placebeaux
quote:
Ever sheep in this thread has gotten owned with proof. Yall probably think magicians actually pull rabbits out their hats.
No, I believe that the CIA crafted a plan that they gave to AQ while they simultaneously planted tons of explosives in three buildings (while being completely undetected). Then, on D-day, they were able to fly the people on the planes to an undisclosed location, without being detected on radar, unloaded them, made them disappear forever, take off again, crash into 2 buildings, then fly a cruise missile disguised as a commercial airliner into the Pentagon so we could get oil and opium.
Posted on 8/7/17 at 2:37 pm to Placebeaux
quote:
Ever sheep in this thread has gotten owned with proof. Yall probably think magicians actually pull rabbits out their hats.
The simplest answer is usually the correct one. I don't believe we have a government full of Lex Luthors. I think our country is run by morons like John Podesta who had his password to his email be "password" and then have the DNC's password be "DNC2016". That's what people we're dealing with here.
I'm a fan of Halon's razor which says: "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity".
Popular
Back to top


1





