- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: So Idiocracy really is a documentary
Posted on 7/10/22 at 2:18 pm to sabes que
Posted on 7/10/22 at 2:18 pm to sabes que
quote:Oh don’t be disingenuous here.
Not true at all. We as a society favor life in prison for certain crimes , but not life in prison for all or any crime. What you said is not true
2
Posted on 7/10/22 at 2:22 pm to joebauers
quote:
Researchers from the University of East Anglia find that natural selection is favoring poorer people with little education. The study “shows how natural selection effects are stronger in groups with lower income and less education, among younger parents, people not living with a partner, and people with more lifetime sexual partners.”
Harvey Danger had this figured out 10 years before Idiocracy.
quote:
Been around the world and found that only stupid people are breeding
The cretins cloning and feeding
And I don’t even own a TV
Posted on 7/10/22 at 2:23 pm to Scruffy
You said we as a society are all or nothing. That proves that is not correct
Posted on 7/10/22 at 2:26 pm to lostinbr
Birth rates decrease with more income and access to birth control, it’s not based on intelligence
Posted on 7/10/22 at 2:37 pm to Scruffy
Actually many poor countries in Africa have a high birth rate largely due to the Catholic Church telling them that condoms are sin.
Posted on 7/10/22 at 2:47 pm to magildachunks
quote:I completely disagree here.
It could be better, yes. But it isn't a Soviet form, and won't ever reach that.
We are slowly trudging in that direction, and will get there at some point.
I believe it is an inevitability, especially as we transition to some global government, which will happen.
It is such an easy system of control, and far easier than capitalism.
This post was edited on 7/10/22 at 2:49 pm
Posted on 7/10/22 at 2:48 pm to sabes que
quote:
, it’s not based on intelligence
No sane person could believe this.
Smart people don't take the same number of shitty risks that dumb people do.
Posted on 7/10/22 at 2:49 pm to Scruffy
Impoverished people are easy to control
Posted on 7/10/22 at 2:50 pm to RogerTheShrubber
But you said being risk averse is a bad thing?
Posted on 7/10/22 at 2:51 pm to Scruffy
quote:
It is such an easy system of control, and far easier than capitalism.
The Soviet form is a form of Serfdom. And Russia is famous for being the last practitioner of Serfdom. They only gave it up halfway through the 19th century. And not ever fully until the 1990's when they became capitalistic.
Posted on 7/10/22 at 2:52 pm to sabes que
quote:
But you said being risk averse is a bad thing?
Overly risk averse, yes.
There is a difference between being smart and scared. Maybe you should read all of the stuff I said in that thread, because it will ruin your little fantasy.
I'd risk a lot to save a child, voluntarily
This post was edited on 7/10/22 at 2:53 pm
Posted on 7/10/22 at 2:53 pm to magildachunks
Funny enough, a feudalistic society is what some here a advocating for. “Get what you can, every man for himself”…. How did that work out. Like I said even Neanderthals had some form of caring for the needy
Posted on 7/10/22 at 2:54 pm to magildachunks
quote:
The Soviet form is a form of Serfdom
Exactly where we are headed.
Technocracy is the goal, which is state/corporate socialism.
Posted on 7/10/22 at 2:55 pm to RogerTheShrubber
Would you? What about a 2 year old that needs government assistance to survive and have adequate healthcare?
Posted on 7/10/22 at 3:01 pm to joebauers
We need to end welfare for single mothers.
We should also quit allowing medicaid patients to have a kid for what is essentially free. You can do this by garnishing their tax returns or wages until it is paid back.
We should also quit allowing medicaid patients to have a kid for what is essentially free. You can do this by garnishing their tax returns or wages until it is paid back.
This post was edited on 7/10/22 at 6:06 pm
Posted on 7/10/22 at 3:05 pm to Limitlesstigers
And do what with the children in need?
Posted on 7/10/22 at 3:08 pm to sabes que
quote:
No one hates the nuclear family, it’s just like no one is pro abortion, no one wants babies to be aborted or thinks that’s optimal, and no one thinks broken families are optimal.
Posted on 7/10/22 at 3:13 pm to sabes que
quote:
And do what with the children in need?
So how do you suggest we decrease the number of people on welfare only because they're stupid an/or lazy? It's not a sustainable plan to continue to write checks per child, thus incentiving more dependent children? What is the solution, Kemo Sabe?
Posted on 7/10/22 at 3:25 pm to sabes que
quote:
What if someone can’t be cared for by the family? A person born with a terrible disease that will cost millions of dollars?
Charities
Page 8 of 9
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News