re: So-called "moon landing"

All the parts to this buggy (we are told) fit into the Flying Cardboard BOX -- along with the two "astronauts"?

So yeah -- this doohickey goes here and there. And now we're DONE!! Watch how the sand gets kicked up and fall -- just like on earth!

Oh...and we apparently have all the time and oxygen in the world for this absurd made-for-TV spectacle! Jut like our teeing up golf balls! (research, examination of the terrain? Live dig of the "lunar" soil and rocks?? Meh."

Folks -- these "Moon Missions" were 1000% bogus. A Psyop. And a Ritual. Every Astronaut is a Freemason. There is no "Outer Space".

They know. Many know. It's made you dismiss the Biblical account of Creation. NASA is a bogus org working in conjunction with Hollywood and Disney since the early 1950s. ALL of us were programmed via athesist-luciferian Sci-Fi guys like Arthur C. Clark, Jack Parsons and L. Ron Hubard. Schools "educated" you with their globes; neverending movies and TV programs set you up to anticipate and actually expect "muh-Alien" invasions and "encounters." (Almost there)

Oh, and: IT'S FLAT.

(So sez NASA and US Goobermint training manuals for flying airplanes and jets):



Need more proof? (read and save before it gets buried into Memory Hole like so much else)


15 NASA Research Papers That Admit Flat & Non-rotating

quote:

---

1. NASA's Reference Publication #1207 entitled Derivation and Definition of a Linear Aircraft Model assumes the Earth is flat and not rotating.

Produced in August 1988, the publication details obscure concepts such as "Rotational Acceleration" and "Earth-Relative Velocity. " Or to a layman, how planes lift off, fly over, and land upon the Earth. Immediately following the cover page and index on the very first line under Summary we see this: "This report documents the derivation and definition of a linear aircraft model for a rigid aircraft of constant mass flying over a flat, nonrotating Earth." The very same line appears again in the Introduction (2nd paragraph), and again under Concluding Remarks (Page 30), and finally, on the Report Document Page (Page 102, Section 16). Here is the link to entire report: https://nasa.gov/centers/dryden/pdf/88104main_H-1391.pdf


Below are 14 more Aeronautic Papers and Technical Memorandums that say the same:


2. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics; General Equations of Motion for a Damaged Asymmetric Aircraft (Page 2, Section II) ... “In this paper, the rigid body equations of motion over a flat non-rotating earth are developed…” https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20070030307.pdf

3. NASA Technical Memorandum 104330; Predicted Performance of a Thrust-Enhanced SR-71 Aircraft with an External Payload (Page 8 - Digital Performance Simulation Description) "The DPS equations of motion use four assumptions ... a nonrotating Earth."

https://www.nasa.gov/centers/dryden/pdf/88507main_H-2179.pdf

4. NASA Technical Note: A Method for Reducing The Sensitivity of Optimal Nonlinear Systems to Parameter Uncertainty (Page 12 Problem Statement) ... "(2) A flat, nonrotating Earth"

https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19710018599.pdf

5. NASA Technical Note; Calculation of Wind Compensation for Launching of Unguided Rockets (Page 8 Trajectory Simulation, 2nd Paragraph) ..."this simulation assumes ... the missile position in space is computed relative to a flat nonrotating Earth"

https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20040008097.pdf

6. NASA Technical Paper 2768; User's Manual for LINEAR, a FORTRAN Program to Derive Linear Aircraft Models (Page 12, Program Overview) ... “Within the program, the nonlinear equations of motion include 12 states representing a rigid aircraft flying in a stationary atmosphere over a flat nonrotating Earth” https://www.nasa.gov/centers/dryden/pdf/88072main_H-1259.pdf

7. NASA Technical Paper 2835; "User's Manual for LINEAR, a FORTRAN Program to Derive Linear Aircraft Models" (Page 1, Summary) AND (Page 126 , Report Documentation Page, Section 16) "The nonlinear equations of motion used are six-degree-of-freedom equations with stationary atmosphere and flat, nonrotating earth assumptions."

https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19890007066.pdf

8. NASA Technical Memorandum; Determination of Angles of Attack and Sideslip from Radar Data and a Roll Stabilized Platform (Page 2, Section 16.) “The method is limited, however, to application where a flat, nonrotating earth may be assumed.”

9. NASA Contractor Report 186019; An Aircraft Model for the AIAA Controls Design Challenge (Page 11, Equation of Motion and Atmospheric Model) ... “The nonlinear equations of motion used in this model are general six-degree-of-freedom equations representing the flight dynamics of a rigid aircraft flying in a stationary atmosphere over a flat nonrotating Earth.”

https://www.nasa.gov/centers/dryden/pdf/88248main_H-1777.pdf

10. NASA Contractor Report 3073; Investigation of Aircraft Landing in Variable Wind Fields (Page 6, Chapter II - Aircraft Landing Model) ... "The Aircraft trajectory model employed in this study was derived based on the following assumptions: a) The Earth is flat and non-rotating. "

https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19790005472.pdf

11. NASA Technical Memorandum 81238; A Mathematical Model of the CH-53 Helicopter (Page 17, Equations of Motion) .. "The helicopter equations of motion are given in body axes with respect to a flat, nonrotating Earth."

https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19810003557.pdf

12. Engineering Experiment Station, Georgia Institute of Technology, Prepared for NASA; Atmospheric Oscillations (Page 10) ... "A model frequently used is that of a flat, nonrotating earth." ... (next paragraph) .. "The most one can profitably simplify the problem is to consider an isothermal atmosphere, plane level surface, and a nonrotating Earth."

https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19650015408.pdf

13. NASA Tecnical Paper 2002-210718; Stability and Control Estimation Flight Test Results for the SR-71 Aircraft With Externally Mounted Experiments (Pages 10-11 Equations of Motion) ... "These equations assume a rigid vehicle and a flat, nonrotating Earth."

https://www.nasa.gov/centers/dryden/pdf/88733main_H-2465.pdf

14. NASA Technical Memorandum 100996; Flight Testing a VSTOL Aircraft to Identify a Full-Envelope Aerodynamic Model (Pages 4-5, State Estimation) ... “For aircraft problems, the state and measurement models together represent the kinematics of a rigid body for describing motion over a flat, nonrotating Earth…”

https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19880014378.pdf

15. NASA Ames Research Center; Singular Arc Time-Optimal Climb Trajectory of Aircraft in a Two-Dimensional Wind Field (Page 2, Section II. Singular Arc Optimal Control) ... “In our minimum time-to-climb problem, the aircraft is modeled as a point mass and the flight trajectory is strictly confined in a vertical plane on a non-rotating, flat Earth."
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20060053337.pdf

---

Come on man. Escape your Spinning Ball-Copernican (Luciferians worship THE SUN!) and NASA-Programming Bubble!

quote:

---

I'd be willing to bet that you deliberately disregard or ignore any evidence presented that proves the moon landed occurred.

---

PROVE IT.

quote:

---

That satellite dish on the front always gets me

---

HA! Me too.

Thing looks like a bunch of 6th graders slapped that toy together. (Pods: "Oooooohhh!!! That must be the tech developed by 5,000 NASA scientists at the JPL!")

quote:

---

You are a lousy troll or a complete fricking idiot. My guess is both.

---

My guess: You can't refute a damn thing the OP has posted.

NOBODY in this thread has (Why is that??)

quote:

---

My guess: You can't refute a damn thing the OP has posted.

---

I have better things to do than argue with total imbeciles like the two of you.

Explain to me why the Russians never accused the USA of faking the landing.

quote:

---

You accuse people of this then refer to the Bible for the shape of the earth? Hoo boy, seek out a therapist pronto.

---

Why is the Earth’s horizon curved?

quote:

---

multiple governments have photographed the equipment left behind.

---

PROVE IT.

quote:

---

How long was it after the Challenger blew up dud it take to put more people in a rocket?

---

A little over 2 years. Challenger was lost 28 Jan 1986. Discovery was the return to flight mission on 29 Sept 1988.

For comparison Apollo 1 ground fire was 27 January 1967. Apollo 7 (first crewed mission after five uncrewed launches) was 11 October 1968.

quote:

---

The moon isn't real.

---

Nope it was built a thousand years ago by our ancestors. The same people that inhabited Atlantis. A earthquake destroyed Atlantis and the people fled into their Time Machine to escape. They currently live inside the moon which is in fact a hollow satellite.